• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fetal growth standards for Somali population.索马里人群胎儿生长标准。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Aug;34(15):2440-2453. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1667327. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
2
Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.胎儿生长的种族/族裔标准:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):449.e1-449.e41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.032.
3
A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.一项针对非裔美国女性的新定制胎儿生长标准:PRB/NICHD 底特律研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S679-S691.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.229.
4
Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.比较 Hadlock 胎儿生长标准与 Eunice Kennedy Shriver 国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所的种族/民族标准,以预测新生儿发病率和小于胎龄儿。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):474.e1-474.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
5
A contemporary amniotic fluid volume chart for the United States: The NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.美国当代羊水体积图表:NICHD 胎儿生长研究-单胎。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):67.e1-67.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
6
Dichorionic twin trajectories: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.双绒毛膜双胎的生长轨迹:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):221.e1-221.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.044. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
7
Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.比较美国队列中基于人群的胎儿生长标准。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;231(3):338.e1-338.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.034. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
8
Reduced fetal growth velocity precedes antepartum fetal death.胎儿生长速度减缓先于产前胎儿死亡。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):942-952. doi: 10.1002/uog.23111.
9
Gestational diabetes and ultrasound-assessed fetal growth in South Asian and White European women: findings from a prospective pregnancy cohort.南亚裔和白种欧洲裔妇女的妊娠糖尿病和超声评估胎儿生长:一项前瞻性妊娠队列研究的结果。
BMC Med. 2018 Nov 6;16(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1191-7.
10
Unconditional and conditional standards for fetal abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight in an ethnic Chinese population: a birth cohort study.中国汉族人群胎儿腹围和估计胎儿体重的无条件和条件标准:一项出生队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Jun 25;15:141. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0569-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring fetal growth patterns in the second trimester: insights from ultrasound measurements among the Minangkabau Ethnic Group in Indonesia.探索孕中期胎儿生长模式:来自印度尼西亚米南卡保族超声测量的见解。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07042-5.

本文引用的文献

1
A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.一项针对非裔美国女性的新定制胎儿生长标准:PRB/NICHD 底特律研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S679-S691.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.229.
2
Individualized growth assessment: conceptual framework and practical implementation for the evaluation of fetal growth and neonatal growth outcome.个体化生长评估:胎儿生长和新生儿生长结局评估的概念框架与实际应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S656-S678. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.210.
3
The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application.世界卫生组织胎儿生长图表:概念、发现、解读和应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S619-S629. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010.
4
Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits.定制生长图表:原理、验证和临床获益。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S609-S618. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.011.
5
Fetal size standards to diagnose a small- or a large-for-gestational-age fetus.用于诊断小于或大于胎龄儿的胎儿大小标准。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S605-S607. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.217.
6
Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study.胎儿生长标准:NICHD 胎儿生长研究方法与 INTERGROWTH-21st 和世界卫生组织多中心生长参考研究的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S641-S655.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.593. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
7
The satisfactory growth and development at 2 years of age of the INTERGROWTH-21 Fetal Growth Standards cohort support its appropriateness for constructing international standards.INTERGROWTH-21 胎儿生长标准队列在 2 岁时令人满意的生长发育支持了为其构建国际标准的适宜性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S841-S854.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.564. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
8
Universal vs selective ultrasonography to screen for large-for-gestational-age infants and associated morbidity.普遍超声检查与选择性超声检查用于筛查大于胎龄儿及其相关发病率。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;51(6):783-791. doi: 10.1002/uog.17491. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
9
Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy.第175号实践公告:孕期超声检查
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):e241-e256. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001815.
10
Birth weight in live births and stillbirths.活产儿和死产儿的出生体重。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;48(5):602-606. doi: 10.1002/uog.17287.

索马里人群胎儿生长标准。

Fetal growth standards for Somali population.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Aug;34(15):2440-2453. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1667327. Epub 2019 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1080/14767058.2019.1667327
PMID:31544565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7085970/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of fetal size is essential in providing optimal prenatal care. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) study from 2015 demonstrated that estimated fetal weight (EFW) differed significantly by race/ethnicity after 20 weeks. There is a large Somali population residing in Minnesota, many of whom are cared for at our maternal fetal medicine practice at the University of Minnesota. Anecdotally, we noticed an increased proportion of small-for-gestational age diagnoses within this population. We sought to use our ultrasound data to create a reference standard specific for this population and compare to currently applied references.

PURPOSE

We aimed to model fetal growth standards within a healthy Somali population between 16 and 40 weeks gestation, and address possible differences in the growth patterns compared with standards for non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Asian singleton fetuses published by the NICHD in the Fetal Growth Study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using ultrasound data from 527 low risk pregnancies of Somali ethnicity at single tertiary care center between 2011 and 2017. A total of 1107 scans were identified for these pregnancies and maternal and obstetrical data were reviewed. Women 18-40 years of age with low-risk pregnancies and established dating consistent with first trimester ultrasound scan were included. Exclusion criteria were any maternal, fetal or obstetrical conditions known to affect fetal growth.

RESULTS

Estimated fetal weight among Somali pregnancies differed significantly at some time points from the NICHD four ethnic groups, but generally the EFW graph curves crossed over at most time points between the study groups. At week 18, EFW was significantly larger than all other four ethnic groups (all <.001), it was also significantly larger from the Hispanic, Black, and Asian ethnic groups at some time points between 18 and 27 weeks gestation ( < .05). Additionally, EFW among Somali pregnancies was significantly smaller than the Black and Asian ethnicity at 32 and 35-36 weeks and smaller than the White ethnicity at 30 and 38-39 weeks ( < .05). Abdominal circumference (AC) for the Somali population was significantly smaller than the other ethnic groups, especially than the White ethnicity at various time points across 16-40 weeks ( < .05). Femur and humerus length were significantly longer when compared to all other ethnic groups at most time points from 16 to 40 weeks of gestation ( < .05). Biparietal diameter (BPD) was significantly smaller than all other ethnic groups specifically at time of fetal survey (18 weeks) and at time of fetal growth assessment (32 weeks) ( < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in fetal growth standards were found between the Somali ethnicity and other ethnic groups (White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic) at various time points from 16 to 40 weeks of gestation. Racial/ethnic-specific standards improve the precision for evaluating fetal growth and may decrease the proportion of fetuses of Somali ethnicity labeled as small-for-gestational age.

摘要

背景

准确评估胎儿大小对于提供最佳产前护理至关重要。2015 年,美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所(NICHD)的研究表明,20 周后,胎儿体重估计(EFW)因种族/民族而异。明尼苏达州有大量索马里人居住,其中许多人在明尼苏达大学的母胎医学实践中得到了照顾。我们注意到,在这个人群中,小胎龄儿的诊断比例增加了。我们试图利用我们的超声数据为这个人群创建一个特定的参考标准,并与目前应用的参考标准进行比较。

目的

我们旨在为 16 至 40 周龄索马里健康人群建立胎儿生长标准,并探讨与 NICHD 在胎儿生长研究中公布的非西班牙裔白种人、非西班牙裔黑种人、西班牙裔和亚洲单胎胎儿生长标准相比,生长模式可能存在的差异。

材料和方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了 2011 年至 2017 年期间单一三级护理中心 527 例低危妊娠的索马里族裔的超声数据。为这些妊娠确定了 1107 次扫描,并回顾了母亲和产科数据。纳入年龄在 18-40 岁之间、有低危妊娠且与孕早期超声扫描相符的妊娠。排除标准为已知影响胎儿生长的任何母亲、胎儿或产科情况。

结果

索马里妊娠的胎儿估计体重在某些时间点与 NICHD 的四个种族群体存在显著差异,但通常在研究组之间的大多数时间点,EFW 曲线都会交叉。在 18 周时,EFW 明显大于其他四个种族群体(均<.001),在 18 至 27 周之间的某些时间点,EFW 也明显大于西班牙裔、黑人和亚洲裔种族群体(<.05)。此外,在 32 周和 35-36 周时,索马里妊娠的 EFW 明显小于黑人和亚洲种族群体,在 30 周和 38-39 周时,EFW 明显小于白种人种族群体(<.05)。索马里人群的腹围(AC)明显小于其他种族群体,尤其是在 16-40 周的各个时间点明显小于白种人种族群体(<.05)。在 16 至 40 周的大多数时间点,股骨和肱骨长度明显长于其他所有种族群体(<.05)。与所有其他种族群体相比,双顶径(BPD)在胎儿检查(18 周)和胎儿生长评估(32 周)时明显更小(<.05)。

结论

在 16 至 40 周的不同时间点,索马里族裔与其他种族群体(白种人、黑种人、亚洲人和西班牙裔)之间存在胎儿生长标准的显著差异。种族/民族特异性标准可提高胎儿生长评估的准确性,并可能降低被标记为小胎龄儿的索马里裔胎儿的比例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/63cf0601cbc5/nihms-1057591-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/79a4847ddc8c/nihms-1057591-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/508e67cd92d9/nihms-1057591-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/f086e558113c/nihms-1057591-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/9bb01ef2b7ed/nihms-1057591-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/ec8138a7d24f/nihms-1057591-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/1360fc038107/nihms-1057591-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/63cf0601cbc5/nihms-1057591-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/79a4847ddc8c/nihms-1057591-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/508e67cd92d9/nihms-1057591-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/f086e558113c/nihms-1057591-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/9bb01ef2b7ed/nihms-1057591-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/ec8138a7d24f/nihms-1057591-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/1360fc038107/nihms-1057591-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67f/7085970/63cf0601cbc5/nihms-1057591-f0007.jpg