• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对阿片类药物使用障碍药物的态度:一项针对解决了物质使用问题的美国个人的全国性研究结果。

Attitudes toward opioid use disorder medications: Results from a U.S. national study of individuals who resolved a substance use problem.

作者信息

Bergman Brandon G, Ashford Robert D, Kelly John F

机构信息

Recovery Research Institute.

Substance Use Disorders Institute.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Aug;28(4):449-461. doi: 10.1037/pha0000325. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1037/pha0000325
PMID:31556675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7096254/
Abstract

The attitudes of individuals who receive, provide, or influence opioid use disorder (OUD) medication services, also called stakeholders, may enhance or hinder their dissemination and adoption. Individuals who have resolved a significant alcohol or other drug (AOD) problem are a group of key stakeholders whose OUD medication attitudes are not well understood empirically. This group subsumes, but is not limited to, individuals who identify as being "in recovery." Analyses leveraged the National Recovery Study, a geo-demographically representative survey of U.S. adults who resolved a significant AOD problem ( = 1,946). We examined the prevalence of positive, neutral, and negative attitudes toward agonists, such as buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone, and antagonists, such as oral and extended-release depot injection naltrexone. Single-predictor logistic regression models tested for demographic, clinical, and recovery-related correlates of these attitudes and, for those significant at the .1 level, multivariable-predictor logistic regression models tested unique associations between these correlates and attitudes. Results showed that participants were equally likely to hold positive (21.4 [18.9-24.0]%) and negative agonist (23.8 [21.2-26.7]%) attitudes but significantly more likely to hold negative (30.3 [27.4-33.3]%) than positive antagonist attitudes (18.0 [15.9-20.4]%). Neutral attitudes were most commonly endorsed for both agonists (54.8 [51.6-57.9]%) and antagonists (51.7 [48.5-54.8]%). For agonists, more recent AOD problem resolution was a unique predictor of positive attitude, whereas Black and Hispanic races/ethnicities, compared with White, were unique predictors of negative attitude. For antagonists, older age group (45-59 and 60 + vs. 18-29 years), lifetime opioid antagonist medication prescription, and past 90-day non-12-step mutual-help attendance were unique predictors of positive attitude, whereas greater spirituality was a unique predictor of negative attitude. This population-level study of U.S. adults who resolved an AOD problem showed that agonist attitudes may be more positive than anecdotal evidence suggests. Certain characteristics and experiences, however, highlight a greater likelihood of negative attitudes, suggesting these factors may be potential barriers to OUD medication adoption. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

接受、提供或影响阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)药物服务的个人(也称为利益相关者)的态度,可能会促进或阻碍这些服务的传播与采用。已解决严重酒精或其他药物(AOD)问题的个人是一类关键利益相关者,其实证研究对他们的OUD药物态度了解不足。这个群体包括但不限于那些自认为 “处于康复中” 的个人。分析利用了全国康复研究,这是一项对解决了严重AOD问题的美国成年人进行的具有地理人口统计学代表性的调查(n = 1,946)。我们研究了对激动剂(如丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮和美沙酮)和拮抗剂(如口服和长效注射用纳曲酮)的积极、中立和消极态度的流行情况。单预测因素逻辑回归模型测试了这些态度的人口统计学、临床和与康复相关的相关因素,对于在0.1水平上具有显著性的因素,多变量预测因素逻辑回归模型测试了这些相关因素与态度之间的独特关联。结果显示,参与者持有积极态度(21.4 [18.9 - 24.0]%)和消极激动剂态度(23.8 [21.2 - 26.7]%)的可能性相同,但持有消极拮抗剂态度(30.3 [27.4 - 33.3]%)的可能性显著高于积极拮抗剂态度(18. [15.9 - 20.4]%)。对于激动剂和拮抗剂,中立态度最为常见(激动剂为54.8 [51.6 - 5]%,拮抗剂为51.7 [48.5 - 54.8]%)。对于激动剂,最近解决AOD问题是积极态度的独特预测因素,而与白人相比,黑人及西班牙裔种族/族裔是消极态度的独特预测因素。对于拮抗剂,年龄较大的年龄组(45 - 59岁和60岁以上与18 - 29岁相比)、终生阿片类拮抗剂药物处方以及过去90天内非12步互助会参与情况是积极态度的独特预测因素,而更强的灵性是消极态度的独特预测因素。这项针对解决了AOD问题的美国成年人的人群水平研究表明,对激动剂的态度可能比传闻证据所显示的更为积极。然而,某些特征和经历凸显了持有消极态度的更大可能性,表明这些因素可能是采用OUD药物的潜在障碍。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d41/7096254/bb17828f18f5/nihms-1561014-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d41/7096254/5e73ecd9f9ef/nihms-1561014-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d41/7096254/bb17828f18f5/nihms-1561014-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d41/7096254/5e73ecd9f9ef/nihms-1561014-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d41/7096254/bb17828f18f5/nihms-1561014-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Attitudes toward opioid use disorder medications: Results from a U.S. national study of individuals who resolved a substance use problem.对阿片类药物使用障碍药物的态度:一项针对解决了物质使用问题的美国个人的全国性研究结果。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Aug;28(4):449-461. doi: 10.1037/pha0000325. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
2
Perceptions around medications for opioid use disorder among a diverse sample of U.S. adults.美国成年人多样化样本中阿片类药物使用障碍药物的认知情况。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Aug;163:209361. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209361. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
Injectable naltrexone, oral naltrexone, and buprenorphine utilization and discontinuation among individuals treated for opioid use disorder in a United States commercially insured population.在美国商业保险人群中,接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的个体中,可注射纳曲酮、口服纳曲酮和丁丙诺啡的使用和停药情况。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Feb;85:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
4
Assessing perceptions about medications for opioid use disorder and Naloxone on Twitter.评估关于阿片类药物使用障碍和纳洛酮药物在 Twitter 上的认知。
J Addict Dis. 2021 Jan-Mar;39(1):37-45. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1811456. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
5
Association of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment With Alcohol-Related Acute Events.阿片类药物使用障碍治疗与酒精相关的急性事件的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210061. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0061.
6
College students' perceived knowledge of and perceived helpfulness of treatments for opioid use disorder at two American universities.两所美国大学的大学生对阿片类药物使用障碍治疗方法的认知和感知有用性。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2020 Sep 2;46(5):589-603. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1757686. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
7
Pregnancy Rates Among Women Treated with Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.接受阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的女性的妊娠率。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jun;39(8):1342-1348. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08689-8. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
Use of Medications for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder Among US Medicaid Enrollees in 11 States, 2014-2018.美国 11 个州的医疗补助受助人在 2014-2018 年期间使用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的情况。
JAMA. 2021 Jul 13;326(2):154-164. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7374.
9
Attitudes toward opioid use disorder pharmacotherapy among recovery community center attendees.康复社区中心参与者对阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的态度。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Dec;131:108464. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108464. Epub 2021 May 8.
10
Prior National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) opioid use disorder trials as background and rationale for NIDA CTN-0100 "optimizing retention, duration and discontinuation strategies for opioid use disorder pharmacotherapy (RDD)".先前的国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络(CTN)阿片类药物使用障碍试验作为 NIDA CTN-0100“优化阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗(RDD)的保留率、持续时间和停药策略”的背景和原理。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Mar 6;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00223-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes and Subjective Norms Regarding Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Among Individuals in Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in the Greater St. Louis Area.大圣路易斯地区接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的个体对阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的态度和主观规范
J Drug Issues. 2025 Jul;55(3):401-419. doi: 10.1177/00220426241229972. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
Development of a brief stigma and perceptions questionnaire for pharmacists: An exploratory factor analysis approach in New York state counties enrolled in the healing communities study.为药剂师开发一份简短的污名与认知调查问卷:在参与康复社区研究的纽约州各县采用探索性因素分析方法
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Feb;169:209566. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209566. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Burden of Opioid-Related Mortality in the United States.美国阿片类药物相关死亡率负担。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180217. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0217.
2
Suggested Paths to Fixing the Opioid Crisis: Directions and Misdirections.解决阿片类药物危机的建议途径:正确与错误的方向
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180218. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0218.
3
A Public Health Strategy for the Opioid Crisis.应对阿片类药物危机的公共卫生策略。
Peer support for patients with opioid use disorder in the emergency department: A narrative review.
急诊科对阿片类物质使用障碍患者的同伴支持:一项叙述性综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Aug 14;5(4):e13253. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13253. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Impact of Perceived Access and Treatment Knowledge on Medication Preferences for Opioid Use Disorder.感知可及性和治疗知识对阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗偏好的影响。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Oct;45(4):706-715. doi: 10.1177/29767342241254591. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Knowledge, experiences, and perceptions of medications for opioid use disorder among Black Kentuckians.肯塔基州黑人对阿片类药物使用障碍药物的认知、经验和看法。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2322051. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2322051. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
6
Willingness to utilize a mobile treatment unit in five counties at the epicenter of the US rural opioid epidemic.美国农村阿片类药物流行中心五个县使用移动治疗单元的意愿。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Apr;159:209262. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209262. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
7
Support for Safe Consumption Sites Among Peer Recovery Coaches.同伴康复教练对安全使用场所的支持。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr;51(2):219-231. doi: 10.1007/s11414-023-09846-3. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
"Knowing or not knowing": Living as harm reductionists in Twelve Step recovery.“知晓与否”:作为减少伤害者在十二步康复法中生活
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Feb;145:208954. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.208954. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
9
Buprenorphine involvement in opioid overdose deaths: A retrospective analysis of postmortem toxicology in Marion County, Indiana, 2015-2021.丁丙诺啡与阿片类药物过量死亡的关系:对2015 - 2021年印第安纳州马里恩县尸检毒理学的回顾性分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2023 Mar;6. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100131. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
10
Predictors and outcomes of online mutual-help group attendance in a national survey study.全国性调查研究中在线互助小组参与的预测因素和结果。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jul;138:108732. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108732. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
Public Health Rep. 2018 Nov/Dec;133(1_suppl):24S-34S. doi: 10.1177/0033354918793627.
4
Understanding the use of diverted buprenorphine.理解丁丙诺啡的转用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
5
On being "in recovery": A national study of prevalence and correlates of adopting or not adopting a recovery identity among individuals resolving drug and alcohol problems.处于“康复中”:一项全国性研究,调查在解决药物和酒精问题的个体中,采用或不采用康复身份的流行程度和相关因素。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Sep;32(6):595-604. doi: 10.1037/adb0000386. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
6
Expanding the reach of alcohol and other drug services: Prevalence and correlates of US adult engagement with online technology to address substance problems.扩大酒精和其他药物服务的范围:美国成年人使用在线技术解决物质问题的普遍性及其相关因素。
Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;87:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
7
A population-based examination of trends and disparities in medication treatment for opioid use disorders among Medicaid enrollees.一项基于人群的研究,调查了医疗补助计划参保者中阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的趋势和差异。
Subst Abus. 2018;39(4):419-425. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2018.1449166. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
8
Substance use, recovery, and linguistics: The impact of word choice on explicit and implicit bias.物质使用、恢复和语言学:词汇选择对显性和隐性偏见的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Aug 1;189:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
9
Beyond Abstinence: Changes in Indices of Quality of Life with Time in Recovery in a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Adults.超越禁欲:一项全美成年人代表性样本研究显示,在恢复期间,生活质量指标随时间变化的情况。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Apr;42(4):770-780. doi: 10.1111/acer.13604. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
10
Is recovery from cannabis use problems different from alcohol and other drugs? Results from a national probability-based sample of the United States adult population.大麻使用问题的康复是否与酒精和其他药物不同?来自美国成年人口全国概率抽样的结果。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Mar;53:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 26.