Kazi Sadaf, Khaleghzadegan Salar, Dinh Julie V, Shelhamer Mark J, Sapirstein Adam, Goeddel Lee A, Chime Nnenna O, Salas Eduardo, Rosen Michael A
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hum Factors. 2021 Feb;63(1):32-65. doi: 10.1177/0018720819874160. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
Review the use of physiological measurement in team settings and propose recommendations to improve the state of the science.
New sensor and analytical capabilities enable exploration of relationships between team members' physiological dynamics. We conducted a review of physiological measures used in research on teams to understand (1) how these measures are theoretically and operationally related to team constructs and (2) what types of validity evidence exist for physiological measurement in team settings.
We identified 32 articles that investigated task-performing teams using physiological data. Articles were coded on several dimensions, including team characteristics. Study findings were categorized by relationships tested between team physiological dynamics (TPD) and team inputs, mediators/processes, outputs, or psychometric properties.
TPD researchers overwhelmingly measure single physiological systems. Although there is research linking TPD to inputs and outputs, the research on processes is underdeveloped.
We recommend several theoretical, methodological, and statistical themes to expand the growth of the TPD field.
Physiological measures, once established as reliable indicators of team functioning, might be used to diagnose suboptimal team states and cue interventions to ameliorate these states.
回顾生理测量在团队情境中的应用，并提出改进该科学领域现状的建议。
新的传感器和分析能力使得探索团队成员生理动态之间的关系成为可能。我们对团队研究中使用的生理测量方法进行了综述，以了解（1）这些测量方法在理论和操作上如何与团队结构相关，以及（2）在团队情境中生理测量存在哪些类型的效度证据。
我们识别出32篇使用生理数据研究任务执行团队的文章。文章在几个维度上进行编码，包括团队特征。研究结果根据团队生理动态（TPD）与团队输入、中介/过程、输出或心理测量属性之间测试的关系进行分类。
TPD研究人员绝大多数测量单一生理系统。虽然有将TPD与输入和输出联系起来的研究，但关于过程的研究尚不完善。
我们推荐几个理论、方法和统计方面的主题，以促进TPD领域的发展。
一旦生理测量被确立为团队功能的可靠指标，可能会用于诊断次优团队状态并提示干预措施以改善这些状态。
