Suppr超能文献

NCCN 成员机构实施 NCCN 精神痛苦管理指南的最新情况。

Update on the Implementation of NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management by NCCN Member Institutions.

机构信息

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Oct 1;17(10):1251-1256. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7358.

Abstract

The first NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Distress Management were published in 1999. Since then, a number of other organizations have advocated for distress screening. Previous surveys of distress screening showed modest progress in implementation of the NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management by NCCN Member Institutions (MIs); this review examined whether further progress has been made. Representatives appointed to the NCCN Distress Management Panel or their designee were asked to complete an online survey in the summer of 2018. The survey was developed based on similar surveys performed in 2005 and 2012 and a survey of psychosocial staffing conducted in NCCN MIs in 2012. New items solicited details about triaging, rescreening, formal screening protocols, and tracking of distressed patients. The survey was completed by representatives from 23 of 27 NCCN MIs (85%). Among the responding institutions, 20 (87%) currently conduct routine screening for distress and 3 are piloting routine screening. All respondents reported use of a self-report measure to screen for distress, with the Distress Thermometer most often used. A total of 70% of respondents rescreen patients for distress and 83% reported having a formal distress screening protocol in place. Once triaged, 65% of institutions who routinely screen for distress track clinical contacts and referrals; 70% track rates of adherence to screening protocols. Findings suggest wide acceptance and implementation of the NCCN Guidelines. Most respondents reported the existence of a formal distress screening protocol, with routine tracking of clinical contacts and referrals and rates of protocol adherence. Clinical experience and the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accreditation standard for cancer centers appear to have resulted in greater adoption and implementation of the guidelines, but considerable opportunities for improvement remain.

摘要

1999 年发布了第一版 NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南(NCCN 指南)中的痛苦管理指南。此后,许多其他组织也提倡进行痛苦筛查。之前对痛苦筛查的调查显示,NCCN 成员机构(MIs)在实施 NCCN 痛苦管理指南方面取得了一定进展;本研究旨在评估是否取得了进一步进展。被任命为 NCCN 痛苦管理小组代表或其指定人员的代表被要求在 2018 年夏天完成在线调查。该调查是基于 2005 年和 2012 年进行的类似调查以及 2012 年对 NCCN MIs 中的心理社会人员配备情况进行的调查而制定的。新的项目征集了分诊、重新筛查、正式筛查方案以及跟踪痛苦患者的详细信息。该调查由 27 个 NCCN MIs 中的 23 个代表(85%)完成。在所调查的机构中,有 20 个(87%)机构目前对痛苦进行常规筛查,有 3 个机构正在试行常规筛查。所有受访者均报告使用自我报告量表筛查痛苦,其中最常用的是痛苦温度计。共有 70%的受访者对患者进行痛苦重新筛查,83%的受访者报告制定了正式的痛苦筛查方案。一旦分诊,65%的常规筛查痛苦的机构会跟踪临床接触和转介情况;70%的机构会跟踪筛查方案的遵守率。研究结果表明,该指南得到了广泛的接受和实施。大多数受访者报告存在正式的痛苦筛查方案,对临床接触和转介进行常规跟踪,并跟踪对筛查方案的遵守率。临床经验和美国外科医师学会癌症委员会对癌症中心的认证标准似乎促进了对指南的更多采用和实施,但仍有很大的改进空间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验