Plavskin Alexandra, Samuels William E, Calzone Kathleen A
Hunter College New York New York.
College of Staten Island CUNY Staten Island New York.
Nurs Open. 2019 Aug 13;6(4):1404-1413. doi: 10.1002/nop2.346. eCollection 2019 Oct.
To psychometrically test the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) for evidence of content, face and construct validity.
This study was a secondary data analysis.
Data collected from the Method for Introducing a New Competency into Nursing Practice (MINC) study were used to evaluate the GGNPS for evidence of construct validity via structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis. Face validity was evaluated via feedback from practicing RNs without specific experience with or knowledge of genetics/genomics. Content validity was evaluated via content expert feedback and assessment of a content validity index.
The thresholds for evidence of content and face validity were met. However, we found less evidence for construct validity of the GGNPS; an exploratory factor analysis, conducted to gain additional insight into the theorized latent constructs, determined that the variables were more interrelated that previously predicted.
对遗传与基因组护理实践调查（GGNPS）进行心理测量测试，以获取内容效度、表面效度和结构效度的证据。
本研究为二次数据分析。
从将新能力引入护理实践的方法（MINC）研究中收集的数据，通过结构方程建模和验证性因素分析，用于评估GGNPS的结构效度证据。表面效度通过没有遗传/基因组学特定经验或知识的执业注册护士的反馈进行评估。内容效度通过内容专家反馈和内容效度指数评估来进行评估。
达到了内容效度和表面效度证据的阈值。然而，我们发现GGNPS结构效度的证据较少；进行探索性因素分析以进一步了解理论上的潜在结构，结果确定这些变量之间的相互关系比之前预测的更为紧密。
