Suppr超能文献

使用两种设备的前房深度及巴雷特通用II公式计算人工晶状体屈光度的准确性

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula.

作者信息

Muniz Castro Hannah, Tai Audrey X, Sampson Samuel J, Wade Matthew, Farid Marjan, Garg Sumit

机构信息

UT Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.

UC Irvine Department of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 23;2019:8172615. doi: 10.1155/2019/8172615. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements.

SETTING

University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute in Irvine, California.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

METHODS

This study included 144 eyes of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.0 years (range 40.8 to 92.1 years) that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using Catalys. Preoperative measurements of ACD were taken by the IOLMaster and Catalys. Manifest refraction and refractive spherical equivalent were measured 1 month postoperatively. Expected refractive results were compared with actual postoperative refractive results.

RESULTS

The correlation between the ACD values from the two devices was good ( = 0.80). The Catalys ACD measurements yielded a larger ACD compared to the IOLMaster, with a mean difference of 0.22 mm ( < 0.0001). The correlation between the postoperative and predicted RSE of the implanted IOL power was excellent ( = 0.96). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean absolute error derived from the IOLMaster, 0.37 diopter (D) ± 0.34 (SD), and the Catalys, 0.37 ± 0.35 D (=0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

The Catalys biometry yielded a significantly larger ACD value than the IOLMaster. This difference in ACD value, however, did not reflect in a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation and refractive prediction error using the Barrett Universal II Formula.

摘要

目的

比较IOLMaster和Catalys对前房深度(ACD)的术前测量结果;此外,比较使用两种不同测量值通过巴雷特通用II公式计算的人工晶状体度数的准确性。

设置

加利福尼亚州欧文市加利福尼亚大学欧文分校加文·赫伯特眼科研究所。

设计

回顾性比较研究。

方法

本研究纳入了90例患者的144只眼,平均年龄72.0岁(范围40.8至92.1岁),这些患者接受了使用Catalys的飞秒激光辅助白内障手术。术前使用IOLMaster和Catalys测量ACD。术后1个月测量显验光和等效球镜度。将预期屈光结果与实际术后屈光结果进行比较。

结果

两种设备测得的ACD值之间相关性良好(=0.80)。与IOLMaster相比,Catalys测得的ACD值更大,平均差值为0.22mm(<0.0001)。植入人工晶状体度数的术后与预测等效球镜度之间的相关性极佳(=0.96)。IOLMaster得出的平均绝对误差为0.37屈光度(D)±0.34(标准差),Catalys得出的平均绝对误差为0.37±0.35D(=0.50),两者之间无统计学显著差异。

结论

Catalys生物测量法得出的ACD值比IOLMaster显著更大。然而,ACD值的这种差异在使用巴雷特通用II公式计算人工晶状体度数和屈光预测误差方面未反映出统计学显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a70a/6778875/cedb1ee2a746/JOPH2019-8172615.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验