Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Dent Mater J. 2020 Jan 31;39(1):24-36. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-172. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
This review scientifically compares the properties of zirconia and titanium, but does not identify the best among them as an implant material. Surface treatment and modification to improve tissue bonding and inhibit bacterial adhesion are not considered in this review. The mechanical properties of titanium are superior to those of zirconia; some studies have shown that zirconia can be used as a dental implant, especially as an abutment. Extensive surface treatment research is ongoing to inhibit bacterial adhesion and improve osseointegration and soft tissue adhesion phenomena which make it difficult to evaluate properties of the materials themselves without surface treatment. Osseointegration of titanium is superior to that of zirconia itself without surface treatment; after surface treatment, both materials show comparable osseointegration. The surface morphology is more important for osseointegration than the surface composition. To inhibit bacterial adhesion, zirconia is superior to titanium, and hence, more suitable for abutments. Both materials show similar capability for soft tissue adhesion.
这篇综述科学比较了氧化锆和钛的性能,但并未确定它们之中哪种更适合作为种植体材料。本综述未考虑改善组织结合和抑制细菌黏附的表面处理和改性。钛的机械性能优于氧化锆;一些研究表明氧化锆可用作牙科种植体,特别是用作基台。目前正在进行广泛的表面处理研究,以抑制细菌黏附并改善骨整合和软组织黏附现象,在没有表面处理的情况下,很难评估材料本身的性能。未经表面处理时,钛的骨整合性能优于氧化锆本身;经过表面处理后,两种材料均显示出相当的骨整合性能。表面形态对于骨整合比表面成分更为重要。为了抑制细菌黏附,氧化锆优于钛,因此更适合用作基台。两种材料在软组织黏附方面表现出相似的性能。