Technical Department, Malaria Consortium Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Technical Department, Malaria Consortium, London, UK.
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1678283. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1678283.
: Integrated community case management (iCCM) for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhea continues to be a recommended strategy to address child mortality in areas where access to health facilities is limited.: To identify models of, and gaps in, institutionalization of benchmark components of iCCM into national health systems of low-and-middle-income countries, in order to draw lessons for future iCCM implementation and sustainability.: A scoping review of relevant searchable policy documents and publications available in English literature was undertaken. Data were selected, collated and characterized by three reviewers using the Arksey and O'Malley framework.: Overall 19 countries were reviewed. Despite the existence of discrete policies, most iCCM programs relied heavily on implementing partners and donor financing. Parallel implementing partner-run systems were often used to procure and supply iCCM medicines. These modes of implementation occasionally violated some health system strengthening principles. Drug stock-outs were still prominent in several countries, and iCCM indicators were sometimes not integrated into the national health management information system. There were no clearly defined motivation packages for both salaried and unsalaried workers, and there were several supervision challenges. Community-based performance-financing, use of technology with mobile devices (mHealth), small procedural improvements, and provision of targeted rather than universal services, were some of the promising interventions for improved iCCM institutionalization.: Sustainable iCCM will require improved ownership by the benefiting communities and the local and central governments. Government commitment should be evident in budgeting processes and implementation strategies.
综合社区病例管理(iCCM)用于疟疾、肺炎和腹泻,继续是解决获得卫生设施机会有限地区儿童死亡率的推荐策略。为了确定 iCCM 的基准组成部分融入中低收入国家国家卫生系统的模式和差距,以便为未来的 iCCM 实施和可持续性汲取经验教训。对可搜索的英文文献中的相关政策文件和出版物进行了范围审查。使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架,由三名评审员选择、整理和描述数据。共审查了 19 个国家。尽管存在离散的政策,但大多数 iCCM 计划严重依赖实施伙伴和捐助者的供资。通常使用并行的实施伙伴管理系统来采购和供应 iCCM 药品。这些实施模式偶尔违反了一些加强卫生系统的原则。一些国家仍存在明显的药品短缺现象,并且 iCCM 指标有时未纳入国家卫生管理信息系统。没有明确界定有薪和无薪工人的激励方案,而且存在一些监督挑战。基于社区的绩效供资、使用移动设备(移动医疗)的技术、小的程序改进以及提供有针对性而非普遍的服务,是提高 iCCM 制度化的一些有希望的干预措施。可持续的 iCCM 将需要受益社区以及地方和中央政府更好地拥有。政府承诺应体现在预算编制过程和实施战略中。