Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3498-3504. doi: 10.1177/0363546519882034. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
Concern for head injuries is widespread and has been reported by the media to be the number one cause of decreased participation in football among the American youth population. Identifying player mechanisms associated with intentional, or purposeful, head impacts should provide critical data for rule modifications, educational programs, and equipment design.
To investigate the frequency of intentional and unintentional head impacts and to examine the player mechanisms associated with intentional high-magnitude head impacts by comparing the impact mechanism distributions among session type, player position, and ball possession.
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Head impact sensors and video footage of 68 players were used to analyze and classify 1319 high-magnitude impacts recorded over 1 season of youth football.
In total, 80% of the high-magnitude head impacts were classified as being caused by intentional use of the head. Head-to-head impact was the primary impact mechanism (n = 868; 82.7%) within the 1050 intentional high-magnitude impacts, with classifiable mechanisms, followed by head-to-body (n = 139; 13.2%), head-to-ground (n = 34; 3.2%), and head-to-equipment (n = 9; 0.9%). Head-to-head impacts also accounted for a greater proportion of impacts during practices (n = 625; 88.9%) than games, for linemen (n = 585; 90.3%) than perimeters and backs, and for ball carriers (n = 72; 79.1%) than tacklers.
Overall, the majority of high-magnitude head impacts were intentional and resulted from head-to-head contact. The proportion of head-to-head contact was significantly higher for practices than games, linemen than backs and perimeter players, and ball carriers than tacklers.
人们普遍关注头部受伤问题,媒体报道称,这是导致美国青少年人群参与足球运动减少的头号原因。确定与球员故意用头撞击(即有目的的头部撞击)相关的机制,可为规则修改、教育项目和设备设计提供重要数据。
通过比较不同场次类型、球员位置和控球情况的撞击机制分布,调查故意和非故意头部撞击的频率,并研究与故意造成的高强度头部撞击相关的球员机制。
横断面研究;证据等级,3 级。
使用头部撞击传感器和 68 名球员的视频片段,对一个青少年足球赛季中记录的 1319 次高强度撞击进行分析和分类。
高强度头部撞击中,80%的撞击被归类为故意使用头部造成的。在可分类的机制中,头对头撞击是 1050 次故意高强度撞击中的主要撞击机制(n = 868;82.7%),其次是头撞身体(n = 139;13.2%)、头撞地面(n = 34;3.2%)和头撞设备(n = 9;0.9%)。头对头撞击也占练习(n = 625;88.9%)中撞击的比例大于比赛(n = 585;90.3%),占线卫(n = 585;90.3%)的撞击比例大于外接手和跑卫,占持球人的撞击比例大于擒抱手(n = 72;79.1%)。
总体而言,大多数高强度头部撞击是故意的,是由头对头接触造成的。与比赛相比,练习中头对头接触的比例明显更高,线卫比外接手和跑卫的比例更高,持球人比擒抱手的比例更高。