Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 155 Hamilton Hall CB #3210, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 W Franklin St., Chapel Hill, NC 27516.
Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #311280, Denton, TX 76203.
Sleep Health. 2019 Dec;5(6):592-597. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
To explore (a) how perceptions of personal and divine control over one's sleep schedule combine in distinct ways to predict sleep quality among college students and (b) whether health behaviors and psychological distress mediate the associations between perceptions of sleep control and sleep quality.
We surveyed 1251 students attending a public university in South Texas. All measures were derived from self-reports. Binary logistic regression techniques were used to predict the odds of reporting high-quality sleep in the past month. Mediation analyses were used to decompose the estimated effects of perceptions of sleep control on sleep quality via smoking, drinking, and psychological distress.
Compared to participants who reported both low personal control and low divine control over their sleep schedules, students who reported both high personal control and high divine control exhibited 148% greater odds of reporting high-quality sleep (odds ratio = 2.48; 95% confidence interval = 1.434-4.294). These same participants also showed the highest predicted probabilities of reporting high-quality sleep (22%) compared to students with other sleep control orientations. Mediation analyses indicated that reduced psychological distress partially accounted for these differences, whereas smoking and drinking behaviors did not.
College students who felt they and God both shared full control over their sleep schedules reported the highest quality sleep, which was partially explained by their lower average levels of psychological distress.
探讨(a)大学生对个人和神对自己睡眠时间的控制的感知以何种独特的方式结合起来预测睡眠质量,以及(b)睡眠控制感与睡眠质量之间的关联是否通过健康行为和心理困扰来中介。
我们调查了德克萨斯州南部一所公立大学的 1251 名学生。所有测量均来自自我报告。采用二元逻辑回归技术预测过去一个月报告高质量睡眠的几率。采用中介分析来分解通过吸烟、饮酒和心理困扰对感知睡眠控制对睡眠质量的估计效应。
与报告个人对睡眠控制和神对睡眠控制都低的参与者相比,报告个人和神对睡眠控制都高的学生报告高质量睡眠的几率高 148%(比值比 = 2.48;95%置信区间 = 1.434-4.294)。与具有其他睡眠控制倾向的学生相比,这些学生报告高质量睡眠的预测概率也最高(22%)。中介分析表明,较低的心理困扰部分解释了这些差异,而吸烟和饮酒行为则没有。
感到自己和上帝都完全控制自己睡眠时间的大学生报告的睡眠质量最高,这部分可以通过他们较低的平均心理困扰水平来解释。