Witebsky F G, Keiser J F, Conville P S, Bryan R, Park C H, Walker R, Siddiqi S H
Clinical Pathology Department, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1501-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1501-1505.1988.
BACTEC 13A medium (Johnston Laboratories, Towson, Md.) was compared with Isolator (Du Pont Co., Wilmington, Del.) concentrate for sensitivity, speed, and technical ease of isolation of mycobacteria from paired patient blood samples. Of 72 positive cultures, 63 were positive by both systems. Five positive cultures were detected by BACTEC 13A medium alone, and four were detected by Isolator alone. The median numbers of days to positivity were 12 for BACTEC 13A medium and 14 for Isolator concentrate. BACTEC 13A medium has an advantage over the Isolator in requiring less laboratory manipulation of the specimen but has the disadvantages of not providing isolated colonies or quantitation of organisms. Some technical problems with contamination in both systems are also discussed.
将BACTEC 13A培养基(约翰斯顿实验室,马里兰州陶森市)与Isolator(杜邦公司,特拉华州威尔明顿市)浓缩液在从配对的患者血液样本中分离分枝杆菌的敏感性、速度和技术简易性方面进行了比较。在72份阳性培养物中,两种系统均检测出63份呈阳性。仅BACTEC 13A培养基检测出5份阳性培养物,仅Isolator检测出4份。BACTEC 13A培养基阳性的中位天数为12天,Isolator浓缩液为14天。BACTEC 13A培养基相对于Isolator的优势在于对样本的实验室操作要求较少,但缺点是不能提供分离的菌落或对微生物进行定量。还讨论了两种系统中存在的一些污染技术问题。