Suppr超能文献

选择性剖宫产与非选择性剖宫产分娩的婴儿患 1 型糖尿病的风险比较:观察性研究的荟萃分析。

Risk of Type 1 Diabetes in the Offspring Born through Elective or Non-elective Caesarean Section in Comparison to Vaginal Delivery: a Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Centre for Public Health, University of Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, UK.

出版信息

Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Nov 11;19(11):124. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1253-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Caesarean section (CS) has been associated with an increased risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D). The lack of exposure to maternal vaginal and anal microbiome and bypassing the labor process often observed in elective CS may affect neonatal immune system development. This study aims to summarize the effects of elective and non-elective CS on T1D risk in the offspring.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted online for publications providing data on elective and non-elective CS with T1D diagnosis in children and young adults, followed by a meta-analysis from selected studies. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and GRADEpro tool were applied for quality analysis.

RESULTS

Nine observational studies comprising over 5 million individuals fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Crude OR estimates showed a 12% increased T1D risk from elective CS compared to vaginal delivery with significant heterogeneity. Adjusted ORs from seven studies did not show T1D risk differences from either CS category, and heterogeneity was detected between studies. Separate analysis of cohort and case-control studies reduced the heterogeneity and revealed a slight increase in T1D risk associated with elective CS in cohort studies (adjusted OR = 1.12 (1.01-1.24)), and a higher increased risk associated with non-elective CS in case-control studies (adjusted OR = 1.19 (1.06-1.34)).

CONCLUSION

Summarized crude risk estimates showed a small increased T1D risk in children and young adults born through elective CS compared to vaginal delivery, but with significant heterogeneity. Adjusted risk estimates by study design indicated a slightly increased T1D risks associated with elective or non-elective CS.

摘要

背景

剖宫产(CS)与 1 型糖尿病(T1D)的风险增加有关。在择期 CS 中,经常观察到新生儿无法接触到母体阴道和肛门微生物组,并绕过分娩过程,这可能会影响新生儿的免疫系统发育。本研究旨在总结择期和非择期 CS 对后代 T1D 风险的影响。

方法

在线进行了系统的文献检索,以获取关于择期和非择期 CS 与儿童和青少年 T1D 诊断相关的出版物,并对选定的研究进行了荟萃分析。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 GRADEpro 工具用于质量分析。

结果

符合纳入标准的 9 项观察性研究共纳入超过 500 万人。粗 OR 估计显示,与阴道分娩相比,择期 CS 使 T1D 风险增加了 12%,且存在显著异质性。来自 7 项研究的调整 OR 并未显示 CS 类别之间存在 T1D 风险差异,并且研究之间存在异质性。对队列研究和病例对照研究的单独分析降低了异质性,并显示与择期 CS 相关的 T1D 风险略有增加(调整后的 OR=1.12(1.01-1.24)),而非择期 CS 与 T1D 风险的相关性更高(调整后的 OR=1.19(1.06-1.34))。

结论

总结的粗风险估计显示,与阴道分娩相比,通过择期 CS 分娩的儿童和青少年 T1D 风险略有增加,但存在显著异质性。按研究设计调整的风险估计表明,择期或非择期 CS 与 T1D 风险略有增加相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验