Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine and Ludwig Center for Cancer Stem Cell Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stem Cell Reports. 2019 Nov 12;13(5):777-786. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.10.003.
Some have argued that human fetal tissue research is unnecessary and/or immoral. Recently, the Trump administration has taken the drastic--and we believe misguided--step to effectively ban government-funded research on fetal tissue altogether. In this article, we show that entire lines of research and their clinical outcomes would not have progressed had fetal tissue been unavailable. We argue that this research has been carried out in a manner that is ethical and legal, and that it has provided knowledge that has saved lives, particularly those of pregnant women, their unborn fetuses, and newborns. We believe that those who support a ban on the use of fetal tissue are halting medical progress and therefore endangering the health and lives of many, and for this they should accept responsibility. At the very least, we challenge them to be true to their beliefs: if they wish to short-circuit a scientific process that has led to medical advances, they should pledge to not accept for themselves the health benefits that such advances provide.
有人认为人类胎儿组织研究既不必要也不道德。最近,特朗普政府采取了激烈的——我们认为是有失偏颇的——措施,实际上全面禁止政府资助的胎儿组织研究。在本文中,我们表明,如果没有胎儿组织,整个研究线及其临床结果都不会取得进展。我们认为,这些研究是在符合伦理和法律的情况下进行的,并且已经提供了挽救生命的知识,特别是挽救了孕妇、她们未出生的胎儿和新生儿的生命。我们认为,那些支持禁止使用胎儿组织的人正在阻碍医学进步,从而危及许多人的健康和生命,他们应该为此承担责任。至少,我们要求他们坚持自己的信念:如果他们希望中断导致医学进步的科学进程,他们应该承诺自己不接受这些进步所带来的健康益处。