• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identifying 'hard-to-reach' groups and strategies to engage them in biomedical research: perspectives from engagement practitioners in Southeast Asia.识别“难以触及”的群体以及促使他们参与生物医学研究的策略:来自东南亚参与从业者的观点。
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Jun 26;4:102. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15326.1. eCollection 2019.
2
"We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust" …. Involving and engaging 'seldom listened to' community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach.“我们并非难以接触,但我们可能发现难以信任”……让“很少被倾听”的社区声音参与到临床转化健康研究中:一种社会创新方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 26;7(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z.
3
Combining PPI with qualitative research to engage 'harder-to-reach' populations: service user groups as co-applicants on a platform study for a trial.将质子泵抑制剂(PPI)与定性研究相结合以接触“更难接触到”的人群:服务用户群体作为平台研究试验的共同申请人
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 24;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0023-1. eCollection 2016.
4
Strategies used to engage hard-to-reach populations in childhood disability research: a scoping review.难以接触的残疾儿童人群参与儿童残疾研究的策略:范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Sep;43(19):2815-2827. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1717649. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
5
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
6
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
'Reaching the hard to reach'--lessons learned from the VCS (voluntary and community Sector). A qualitative study.“触及难以触及的人群”——从志愿和社区部门(VCS)中汲取的经验教训。一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 8;10:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-92.
8
In search of the last malaria cases: ethnographic methods for community and private-sector engagement in malaria elimination in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.寻找最后一例疟疾病例:在越南、老挝和柬埔寨消除疟疾中采用民族志方法让社区和私营部门参与。
Malar J. 2021 Sep 17;20(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03903-y.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Strategies to improve engagement of 'hard to reach' older people in research on health promotion: a systematic review.提高“难以接触到”的老年人参与健康促进研究的策略:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 21;17(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4241-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation of screen exposure to stress, learning, cognitive and language performance in children.儿童屏幕暴露与压力、学习、认知及语言表现的相关性。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May;34(5):1615-1624. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02593-6. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Public involvement and engagement in scientific research and higher education: the only way is ethics?公众参与科学研究和高等教育:唯一的途径是道德规范吗?
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 31;10(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00587-x.
3
Opportunities for incorporating intersectionality into biomedical informatics.将交叉性纳入生物医学信息学的机会。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Jun;154:104653. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104653. Epub 2024 May 10.
4
Participant recruitment among vulnerable populations: An experience from a qualitative study among refugee adolescents in Germany.弱势群体中的参与者招募:德国难民青少年定性研究的经验
Open Res Eur. 2023 Nov 7;2:47. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14654.2. eCollection 2022.
5
What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review.如何促使全科医疗参与试验?一项快速综述。
HRB Open Res. 2023 Feb 10;6:13. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13650.1. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of feasibility and acceptability of a web-based diabetes prevention program (DPP) for diabetes risk reduction in Chinese Americans in New York City.评价基于网络的糖尿病预防计划(DPP)在中国纽约城美籍糖尿病高危人群中降低糖尿病风险的可行性和可接受性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;11:1199746. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1199746. eCollection 2023.
7
Promoting the Participation of "Hard-to-Reach" Migrant Populations in Qualitative Public Health Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Chile.促进“难以接触”的移民群体在智利 COVID-19 大流行期间参与定性公共卫生研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1956. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031956.
8
'To me, it's ones and zeros, but in reality that one is death': A qualitative study exploring researchers' experience of involving and engaging seldom-heard communities in big data research.“对我来说,这只是 1 和 0,但实际上,那就是死亡”:一项定性研究,探索研究人员在大数据研究中涉及和吸引很少被听到的社区的经验。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):882-891. doi: 10.1111/hex.13713. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
9
A community engagement approach for an integrated early childhood development intervention: a case study of an urban informal settlement with Kenyans and embedded refugees.社区参与式方法在儿童早期综合发展干预中的应用:以肯尼亚人和境内流离失所难民为对象的城市非正规住区案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 11;22(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13185-x.
10
[Involving the seldom heard in participatory health research: challenges and strategies].[参与式健康研究中鲜为人知的方面:挑战与策略]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):163-170. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03269-7. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Drama as a community engagement strategy for malaria in rural Cambodia.柬埔寨农村地区将戏剧作为疟疾社区参与策略
Wellcome Open Res. 2017 Sep 29;2:95. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12594.2. eCollection 2017.
2
Elements of effective community engagement: lessons from a targeted malaria elimination study in Lao PDR (Laos).有效社区参与的要素:来自老挝人民民主共和国(老挝)一项疟疾消除目标研究的经验教训。
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1366136. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1366136.
3
"Know your audience": A hospital community engagement programme in a non-profit paediatric hospital in Cambodia.“了解你的受众”:柬埔寨一家非营利性儿童医院的社区参与项目。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182573. eCollection 2017.
4
The first Science Café in Laos.老挝的第一家科学咖啡馆。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1376. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31742-1.
5
Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review.探索社区参与在改善弱势群体健康方面的作用:一项系统综述。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Dec 18;8:29842. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.29842. eCollection 2015.
6
Harnessing health information to foster disadvantaged teens' community engagement, leadership skills, and career plans: a qualitative evaluation of the Teen Health Leadership Program.利用健康信息促进弱势青少年的社区参与、领导技能和职业规划:青少年健康领导力项目的定性评估
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Apr;103(2):82-6. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.2.005.
7
The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis.社区参与对弱势群体公共卫生干预措施的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:129. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y.
8
Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups.难以接触的人群:改善健康和医学研究与社会弱势群体相关的策略的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 25;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.
9
Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: the case of the Thai-Myanmar border.医学研究伦理中社区咨询委员会的动机与认知:以泰缅边境地区为例
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Feb 17;15:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-12.
10
Disadvantaging the disadvantaged: When public health policies and practices negatively affect marginalized populations.使弱势群体处境不利:当公共卫生政策和实践对边缘化群体产生负面影响时。
Can J Public Health. 2013 Sep 12;104(5):e410-2. doi: 10.17269/cjph.104.3895.

识别“难以触及”的群体以及促使他们参与生物医学研究的策略:来自东南亚参与从业者的观点。

Identifying 'hard-to-reach' groups and strategies to engage them in biomedical research: perspectives from engagement practitioners in Southeast Asia.

作者信息

Nguyen Thanh Ha, Cheah Phaik Yeong, Chambers Mary

机构信息

Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, HCMC, Vietnam.

Global Health Bioethics Network, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Jun 26;4:102. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15326.1. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15326.1
PMID:31723673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6823897/
Abstract

Public or community engagement (PE/CE) is an increasingly important component of biomedical research. However, PE/CE projects have been criticized for focusing on the 'convenient sample' populations that are more accessible and more likely to respond, thus missing out the less-socially visible groups. In January 2018, engagement practitioners from across Southeast Asia, attending a regional workshop, undertook a discussion about the 'hard-to-reach' populations in the region, and how PE projects can better engage them.  This paper is a summary of that discussion. After an initial brainstorming exercise the hard-to-reach populations identified by workshop participants were broadly categorised into three groups: urban poor, ethnic minority groups and children in rural primary schools. Delegates identified common characteristics of the populations and possible interventions to reach them. Notes of the discussions were used as data for the report. Four common issues that become barriers for engagement were identified: (1) financial instability; (2) mobility in residency and work; (3) discrimination and isolation; and (4) limitations in local resources. It is important to recognise that a group might be more disadvantaged by one factor than the others, but often these issues inter-relate to restrict outreach. In order to engage these populations, a tailor-made programme, that suits the local context, should be created. This can be done through four strategies that have the acronym 'FIND': (1) Formative research to improve understanding of the population; (2) Integrating into local life; (3) Networking with relevant stakeholders; and (4) Developing local resources.  Our discussion highlights the importance of a deep understanding of the local contexts in order to implement relevant and acceptable engagement projects. Findings from this report may be useful for planning public engagement projects in similar settings.

摘要

公众或社区参与(PE/CE)是生物医学研究中日益重要的组成部分。然而,PE/CE项目因聚焦于更容易接触且更有可能做出回应的“便利样本”群体而受到批评,从而遗漏了社会能见度较低的群体。2018年1月,来自东南亚各地的参与从业者参加了一次区域研讨会,就该地区“难以接触到的”人群以及PE项目如何更好地接触他们展开了讨论。本文是该讨论的总结。在初步头脑风暴之后,研讨会参与者确定的难以接触到的人群大致分为三类:城市贫困人口、少数民族群体和农村小学儿童。代表们确定了这些人群的共同特征以及接触他们的可能干预措施。讨论记录用作报告的数据。确定了成为参与障碍的四个常见问题:(1)经济不稳定;(2)居住和工作流动性;(3)歧视与孤立;(4)当地资源有限。必须认识到,一个群体可能在某一个因素上比其他因素更处于不利地位,但这些问题往往相互关联,限制了外展工作。为了接触这些人群,应制定一个适合当地情况的量身定制方案。这可以通过首字母缩写为“FIND”的四种策略来实现:(1)进行形成性研究以增进对人群的了解;(2)融入当地生活;(3)与相关利益攸关方建立网络;(4)开发当地资源。我们的讨论强调了深入了解当地情况对于实施相关且可接受的参与项目的重要性。本报告的研究结果可能有助于在类似环境中规划公众参与项目。