• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院安全态度评估及人口统计学因素对安全态度的影响:安全态度和安全氛围问卷的心理测量学验证。

Evaluation of safety attitudes of hospitals and the effects of demographic factors on safety attitudes: a psychometric validation of the safety attitudes and safety climate questionnaire.

机构信息

China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4682-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4682-0
PMID:31727062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6854737/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study are to test the psychometric properties of the safety attitudes and safety climate questionnaire Chinese simplified version (SAQ-CS), to test the safety attitudes of health professionals in tertiary hospitals in the Liaoning province and to explore the effects of demographic factors on safety attitudes.

METHODS

The SAQ-CS was used to conduct a cross-sectional survey in nine tertiary hospitals in Liaoning province.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha of each subscale of SAQ-CS were > 0.7, the values of GFI, TLI, and CFI were > 0.8, and RMSEA values ranged from 0.048-0.199. The mean of the safety attitudes of 2157 health professionals was 4.00, indicating a good safety attitude, with a positive response rate (% of items that scored ≥4) of 51.1%. The stress recognition subscale had the lowest score, with a mean of 2.73 and a positive response rate of 17.8%. A multiple linear regression equation revealed that demographic factors like gender, age, and training participation significantly affected the scores (β > 0.06, β < - 0.08, β < - 0.07, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric properties of SAQ-CS are good and stable. Health professionals rate teamwork climate, safety climate, perception of management, and work conditions in Liaoning province are perceived as good; however, the stress of the health professionals is poor. To improve safety attitudes, it is necessary to not only reduce the stress of health professionals, but also to pay more attention to men, older health professionals, and health professionals who have not participated in safety training.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在检验安全态度与安全氛围问卷简体中文版(SAQ-CS)的心理测量学特性,测试辽宁省三级医院卫生专业人员的安全态度,并探讨人口统计学因素对安全态度的影响。

方法

采用 SAQ-CS 对辽宁省 9 家三级医院进行横断面调查。

结果

SAQ-CS 各分量表的克朗巴赫α系数均>0.7,GFI、TLI 和 CFI 值均>0.8,RMSEA 值范围为 0.048-0.199。2157 名卫生专业人员安全态度的平均得分为 4.00,表明安全态度良好,≥4 分的项目阳性反应率(%)为 51.1%。应激识别分量表得分最低,平均得分为 2.73,阳性反应率为 17.8%。多元线性回归方程显示,性别、年龄和培训参与等人口统计学因素显著影响得分(β>0.06,β<-0.08,β<-0.07,p<0.05)。

结论

SAQ-CS 的心理测量学特性良好且稳定。辽宁省卫生专业人员对团队合作氛围、安全氛围、管理层感知和工作条件的评价较好,但压力较差。要改善安全态度,不仅要降低卫生专业人员的压力,还要更加关注男性、年龄较大的卫生专业人员和未参加安全培训的卫生专业人员。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of safety attitudes of hospitals and the effects of demographic factors on safety attitudes: a psychometric validation of the safety attitudes and safety climate questionnaire.医院安全态度评估及人口统计学因素对安全态度的影响:安全态度和安全氛围问卷的心理测量学验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4682-0.
2
Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL).荷兰语版安全态度问卷(SAQ-NL)的验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 15;16(a):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1648-3.
3
Hospital safety culture in Taiwan: a nationwide survey using Chinese version Safety Attitude Questionnaire.台湾地区医院安全文化:使用中文版安全态度问卷的全国性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 10;10:234. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-234.
4
Application of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in Albanian hospitals: a cross-sectional study.安全态度问卷(SAQ)在阿尔巴尼亚医院中的应用:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 15;5(4):e006528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006528.
5
Validation study of the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) in public hospitals of Heilongjiang province, China.中国黑龙江省公立医院安全态度问卷(SAQ)的验证研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0179486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179486. eCollection 2017.
6
The safety attitudes questionnaire - ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Slovenian version for the out-of-hours primary care setting.安全态度问卷 - 门诊版:斯洛文尼亚语版在非工作时间基层医疗环境中的心理测量特性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 13;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1972-7.
7
Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study.评估安全态度问卷(SAQ),德语版,瑞士大学医院-验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-347.
8
Validation study of the Amharic version Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.验证阿法尔语版安全态度问卷(SAQ)在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴公立医院中的有效性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10865-9.
9
Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.格鲁吉亚版安全态度问卷的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e034863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034863.
10
Safety culture in the operating room: translation, validation of the safety attitudes questionnaire - operating room version.手术室安全文化:安全态度调查问卷-手术室版本的翻译、验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 16;23(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09539-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety Culture Evaluation in Sarawak General Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ).砂拉越总医院的安全文化评估:一项使用安全态度问卷(SAQ)的横断面研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Aug 27;18:2799-2811. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S530072. eCollection 2025.
2
The relationship between burnout, sense of coherence and job safety attitudes among nurses after coronavirus disease 2019 in China: a cross-sectional survey.2019年冠状病毒病后中国护士职业倦怠、连贯感与职业安全态度之间的关系:一项横断面调查
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 19;13:1516744. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1516744. eCollection 2025.
3
Interventions to enhance safety culture for nursing professionals in long-term care: A systematic review.长期护理中提升护理专业人员安全文化的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Feb 9;5:100119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100119. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Development, validation, and results of a national endoscopy safety attitudes questionnaire (Endo-SAQ).一项全国性内镜检查安全态度问卷(Endo-SAQ)的开发、验证及结果
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Jul 26;11(7):E679-E689. doi: 10.1055/a-2112-5105. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Development of the modified Safety Attitude Questionnaire for the medical imaging department.医学影像科改良安全态度问卷的编制
Singapore Med J. 2025 Jan 1;66(1):33-40. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-254. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
6
Analysis of the convergence of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture.安全态度问卷和医院患者安全文化调查的收敛性分析。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Dec 16;76(1):e20210379. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0379. eCollection 2022.
7
Role of patient safety attitudes between career identity and turnover intentions of new nurses in China: A cross-sectional study.中国新护士职业认同与离职意向之间的患者安全态度的作用:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;10:981597. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.981597. eCollection 2022.
8
Factors Relating to a Safety Culture in the University Perinatal Center: The Nurses' and Midwives' Perspective.与大学围产中心安全文化相关的因素:护士和助产士的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9845. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169845.
9
Patient Safety Attitudes among Doctors and Nurses: Associations with Workload, Adverse Events, Experience.医生和护士的患者安全态度:与工作量、不良事件、经验的关联
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 27;10(4):631. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040631.
10
Patient safety attitude among healthcare workers at different levels of healthcare in Sharqia Governorate, Egypt.埃及沙迦省不同级别医疗机构医护人员的患者安全态度。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2022 Feb 24;14(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3307.

本文引用的文献

1
The safety attitudes questionnaire in Chinese: psychometric properties and benchmarking data of the safety culture in Beijing hospitals.中文版安全态度问卷:北京医院安全文化的心理测量特性及基准数据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2543-2.
2
Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL).荷兰语版安全态度问卷(SAQ-NL)的验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 15;16(a):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1648-3.
3
Safety culture perceptions of pharmacists in Malaysian hospitals and health clinics: a multicentre assessment using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire.马来西亚医院和健康诊所药剂师的安全文化认知:使用安全态度问卷的多中心评估
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 26;5(11):e008889. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008889.
4
Assessing safety culture in NICU: psychometric properties of the Italian version of Safety Attitude Questionnaire and result implications.评估新生儿重症监护病房的安全文化:意大利版安全态度问卷的心理测量特性及结果影响
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;22(2):275-82. doi: 10.1111/jep.12472. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
5
Safety culture in long-term care: a cross-sectional analysis of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire in nursing and residential homes in the Netherlands.长期护理中的安全文化:荷兰护理院和养老院安全态度问卷的横断面分析
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jun;25(6):424-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003397. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
6
Validation of the safety attitudes questionnaire (short form 2006) in Italian in hospitals in the northeast of Italy.意大利东北部医院中意大利语版安全态度问卷(2006年简版)的验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 24;15:284. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0951-8.
7
Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting.《安全态度问卷》在丹麦医院环境中的适应性与验证
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 2;7:149-60. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S75560. eCollection 2015.
8
The safety attitudes questionnaire - ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Norwegian translated version for the primary care setting.安全态度问卷 - 门诊版:初级保健环境中挪威语翻译版的心理测量特性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 29;14:139. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-139.
9
Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study.评估安全态度问卷(SAQ),德语版,瑞士大学医院-验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-347.
10
Swedish translation and psychometric testing of the safety attitudes questionnaire (operating room version).瑞典语翻译和安全态度问卷(手术室版)的心理计量学测试。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Mar 19;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-104.