Matilla-Santander Nuria, Lundh Filippa, Kvart Signild, Baron Sherry L, Bodin Theo, Gevaert Jessie, Håkansta Carin, Hernando Julio C, Muntaner Carles, Kreshpaj Bertina
Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, 113 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):2635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23916-5.
Digital labour platforms are transforming work organization, offering new opportunities but also raising concerns about precarious conditions and health risks. Despite increasing attention to platform work, limited research has examined its direct impact on workers' physical, mental, and social well-being.
The objective of this scoping review is to examine current empirical studies investigating the health effects of working via digital labour platforms, aiming to (i) summarize the existing evidence, (ii) pinpoint knowledge gaps, and (iii) identify areas for methodological enhancements.
We search for peer-reviewed studies published until December 2024 from Web of Science and PubMed, alongside grey literature. Inclusion criteria covered papers with original data, using qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods, resulting in 40 included studies. A pre-established theoretical framework guided result reporting, emphasizing three characteristics affecting worker health: (i) business practices, (ii) employment conditions, and (iii) work environment hazards.
In summary, literature shows a link between digital platform work and poor health. The current evidence, mainly focused on mental health and location-based platform workers, highlights factors contributing to poor physical and mental health, including low-quality employment conditions and psychosocial work environment hazards. Limited evidence suggests a correlation between business practices-algorithmic management and rating systems-and poor mental health. Knowledge gaps include the health impact of web-based platforms, especially medical consultation ones and location-based domestic and care services platforms, and less-explored outcomes like musculoskeletal pain and occupational injuries. Methodological limitations, such as low sample size and lack of control groups, were noted.
This review identifies methodological improvements and knowledge gaps, guiding future research to comprehend the impact of digital platform work on health. As legislation evolves to enhance platform workers' job conditions, researching their health is crucial for offering practical recommendations and shaping evidence-based policies.
数字劳动平台正在改变工作组织形式,带来了新机遇,但也引发了人们对不稳定工作条件和健康风险的担忧。尽管对平台工作的关注日益增加,但对其对工人身心健康和社会福祉的直接影响的研究仍然有限。
本范围综述的目的是审视当前调查通过数字劳动平台工作对健康影响的实证研究,旨在(i)总结现有证据,(ii)找出知识空白,以及(iii)确定方法改进的领域。
我们检索了截至2024年12月发表在《科学引文索引》和《医学期刊数据库》上的同行评议研究,以及灰色文献。纳入标准涵盖有原始数据的论文,采用定性、定量或混合方法,最终纳入40项研究。一个预先建立的理论框架指导结果报告,强调影响工人健康的三个特征:(i)商业行为,(ii)就业条件,以及(iii)工作环境危害。
总之,文献表明数字平台工作与健康状况不佳之间存在联系。目前的证据主要集中在心理健康和基于位置的平台工人,突出了导致身心健康不佳的因素,包括低质量的就业条件和心理社会工作环境危害。有限的证据表明商业行为——算法管理和评级系统——与心理健康不佳之间存在关联。知识空白包括基于网络的平台,特别是医疗咨询平台以及基于位置的家政和护理服务平台对健康的影响,以及较少探讨的结果,如肌肉骨骼疼痛和职业伤害。注意到方法学上的局限性,如样本量小和缺乏对照组。
本综述确定了方法学改进和知识空白,指导未来研究理解数字平台工作对健康的影响。随着立法的发展以改善平台工人的工作条件,研究他们的健康对于提供实际建议和制定基于证据的政策至关重要。