Division of General and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):780-787. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05296-1.
Decreasing the time from patient arrival to definitive surgical care in injured patients requiring an operation improves outcomes. We sought to study the effect of intubation location (emergency department versus operating suite) on time to definitive surgical care. We hypothesized that patients requiring emergency surgical interventions intubated in the emergency department would have shorter times to definitive care when compared to patients intubated in the operating suite.
All injured patients with a preoperative emergency department dwell time of less than 30 min and undergoing emergency operative procedures with the trauma surgery service at an urban Level I center (2010-2017) were analyzed. Demographics, clinical variables, and outcomes were assessed in relation to emergency department intubation versus operating suite intubation. The primary study endpoint was time to initiation of definitive surgical care, defined as the total elapsed time from emergency department arrival until operating room incision time. To investigate the relationship between clinical variables and time, multivariable regression was performed.
In total, 241 patients were included. In total, 138 patients were intubated in the emergency department and 103 patients were intubated in the operative suite. There was no difference between patients intubated in the emergency department and those intubated in the operating room with respect to age, gender, injury mechanism, initial heart rate or systolic blood pressure. Emergency department patients were more likely to sustain post-intubation, traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest (8.0 vs. 0.9%; p = 0.014). No statistical difference in total elapsed time from arrival to definitive surgical care was appreciated between study groups (41 vs. 43 min; p = 0.064). After controlling for clinical variables, emergency department intubation was not associated with time to definitive care (p = 0.386) in the multiple variable regression analysis.
When emergency department and operative suite intubation patients were compared, emergency department intubation did not decrease total elapsed time until definitive surgery but was associated with post-intubation, traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest.
减少需要手术的受伤患者从到达至确定性外科治疗的时间可改善预后。我们研究了在急诊科(ED)和手术室(OR)进行插管对确定性外科治疗时间的影响。我们假设,与在 OR 进行插管的患者相比,在 ED 进行插管的需要紧急外科干预的患者接受确定性治疗的时间更短。
分析了 2010 年至 2017 年期间在城市一级创伤中心接受创伤外科服务的所有术前 ED 滞留时间少于 30 分钟且接受紧急手术的受伤患者。评估了与 ED 插管与 OR 插管相关的人口统计学、临床变量和结果。主要研究终点是开始确定性外科治疗的时间,定义为从 ED 到达至手术室切口时间的总时间。为了研究临床变量与时间之间的关系,进行了多变量回归分析。
共纳入 241 例患者。共有 138 例患者在 ED 进行插管,103 例患者在 OR 进行插管。在 ED 插管的患者与在 OR 插管的患者在年龄、性别、损伤机制、初始心率或收缩压方面无差异。ED 患者更易发生插管后创伤性心肺骤停(8.0% vs. 0.9%;p=0.014)。在到达确定性外科治疗的总时间方面,两组之间无统计学差异(41 分钟 vs. 43 分钟;p=0.064)。在多变量回归分析中,控制了临床变量后,ED 插管与确定性护理时间无关(p=0.386)。
与 ED 和 OR 插管患者相比,ED 插管并未缩短确定性手术的总等待时间,但与插管后创伤性心肺骤停有关。