Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Department of Neurology and Mesulam Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern University, Evanston/Chicago, IL.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Nov 22;62(11):3947-3972. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0219.
Purpose Reorganization of language networks in aphasia takes advantage of the facts that (a) the brain is an organ of plasticity, with neuronal changes occurring throughout the life span, including following brain damage; (b) plasticity is highly experience dependent; and (c) as with any learning system, language reorganization involves a synergistic interplay between organism-intrinsic (i.e., cognitive and brain) and organism-extrinsic (i.e., environmental) variables. A major goal for clinical treatment of aphasia is to be able to prescribe treatment and predict its outcome based on the neurocognitive deficit profiles of individual patients. This review article summarizes the results of research examining the neurocognitive effects of psycholinguistically based treatment (i.e., Treatment of Underlying Forms; Thompson & Shapiro, 2005) for sentence processing impairments in individuals with chronic agrammatic aphasia resulting from stroke and primary progressive aphasia and addresses both behavioral and brain variables related to successful treatment outcomes. The influences of lesion volume and location, perfusion (blood flow), and resting-state neural activity on language recovery are also discussed as related to recovery of agrammatism and other language impairments. Based on these and other data, principles for promoting neuroplasticity of language networks are presented. Conclusions Sentence processing treatment results in improved comprehension and production of complex syntactic structures in chronic agrammatism and generalization to less complex, linguistically related structures in chronic agrammatism. Patients also show treatment-induced shifts toward normal-like online sentence processing routines (based on eye movement data) and changes in neural recruitment patterns (based on functional neuroimaging), with posttreatment activation of regions overlapping with those within sentence processing and dorsal attention networks engaged by neurotypical adults performing the same task. These findings provide compelling evidence that treatment focused on principles of neuroplasticity promotes neurocognitive recovery in chronic agrammatic aphasia. Presentation Videohttps://doi.org/10.23641/asha.10257587.
利用以下事实,重新组织失语症患者的语言网络:(a)大脑是一个具有可塑性的器官,其神经元变化贯穿整个生命过程,包括脑损伤后;(b)可塑性高度依赖于经验;(c)就像任何学习系统一样,语言重组涉及生物体内在(即认知和大脑)和生物体外在(即环境)变量的协同相互作用。失语症临床治疗的主要目标是能够根据个体患者的神经认知缺陷来规定治疗方法并预测其结果。本文综述了研究结果,这些研究检验了基于心理语言学的治疗(即治疗基础形式;Thompson & Shapiro,2005)对因中风和原发性进行性失语症而导致慢性语法障碍的个体的句子处理障碍的神经认知影响,并探讨了与成功治疗结果相关的行为和大脑变量。还讨论了病变体积和位置、灌注(血流)和静息状态神经活动对语言恢复的影响,以及与语法障碍和其他语言障碍恢复相关的影响。基于这些和其他数据,提出了促进语言网络神经可塑性的原则。结论:句子处理治疗可改善慢性语法障碍患者复杂句法结构的理解和产生能力,并推广到更简单、语言相关的结构。患者还表现出治疗诱导的在线句子处理常规向正常化转变(基于眼动数据),以及神经募集模式的变化(基于功能神经影像学),治疗后激活的区域与句子处理和背侧注意网络中的区域重叠,而神经典型成年人执行相同任务时则会激活这些网络。这些发现提供了令人信服的证据,表明以神经可塑性原则为重点的治疗可促进慢性语法障碍患者的神经认知恢复。演讲视频:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.10257587.