Health Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar;68(3):569-575. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16255. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
We sought to investigate older patients' ability to correctly and efficiently dose multidrug regimens over nearly a decade and to explore factors predicting declines in medication self-management.
Longitudinal cohort study funded by the National Institute on Aging.
One academic internal medicine clinic and six community health centers.
Beginning in 2008, 900 English-speaking adults, aged 55 to 74 years, were enrolled in the study, completing a baseline (T1) assessment. To date, 303 participants have completed the same assessment 9 years postbaseline (T4).
At T1, subjects were given a standardized, seven-drug regimen and asked to demonstrate how they would take medicine over 24 hours. The number of dosing errors made and times per day that a participant would take medicine were recorded. Health literacy was measured via the Newest Vital Sign, and cognitive decline was measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination.
Participants on average made 2.9 dosing errors (SD = 2.5 dosing errors; range = 0-21 dosing errors) of 21 potential errors at T1 and 5.0 errors (SD = 2.1 errors; range = 1-18 errors; P < .001) at T4. In a multivariate model, limited literacy (β = .69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .18-1.20; P = .01), meaningful cognitive decline (β = 1.72; 95% CI = .70-2.74; P = .01), number of chronic conditions (β = .21; 95% CI = .07-.34; P = .01), and number of baseline dosing errors (β = -.76; 95% CI = -.85 to -.67; P < .001) were significant, independent predictors of changes in dosing errors. Most patients overcomplicated their daily medication schedule; no sociodemographic characteristics were predictive of poor regimen organization in multivariate models. In a multivariate model, there were no significant predictors of changes in regimen consolidation over time, except regimen consolidation at T1.
Older patients frequently overcomplicated drug regimens and increasingly made more dosing errors over 9 years of follow-up. Patients with limited literacy, cognitive decline, and multimorbidity were at greatest risk for errors. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:569-575, 2020.
我们旨在探究年长患者在近十年内正确且高效地服用多药物方案的能力,并探讨预测药物自我管理能力下降的因素。
由美国国家老龄化研究所资助的纵向队列研究。
一家学术性内科诊所和六家社区健康中心。
自 2008 年起,900 名年龄在 55 至 74 岁之间、讲英语的成年人参与了这项研究,并完成了基线(T1)评估。迄今为止,已有 303 名参与者在基线后 9 年(T4)完成了相同的评估。
在 T1 时,参与者被给予一种标准化的、七种药物的方案,并要求他们展示如何在 24 小时内服药。记录了受试者犯的用药剂量错误次数和每天服药次数。通过最新生命体征测量文化程度,通过简易精神状态检查测量认知能力下降。
参与者在 T1 时平均犯 2.9 次(SD=2.5 次;范围=0-21 次)、21 次潜在错误,在 T4 时犯 5.0 次(SD=2.1 次;范围=1-18 次;P<0.001)。在多变量模型中,有限的文化程度(β=0.69;95%置信区间[CI]:0.18-1.20;P=0.01)、有意义的认知能力下降(β=1.72;95%CI:0.70-2.74;P=0.01)、慢性疾病数量(β=0.21;95%CI:0.07-0.34;P=0.01)和基线用药剂量错误数量(β=-0.76;95%CI:-0.85 至-0.67;P<0.001)是用药错误变化的显著独立预测因素。大多数患者使他们的日常用药方案过于复杂;在多变量模型中,没有社会人口学特征可以预测方案组织不佳。在多变量模型中,除了 T1 时的方案整合外,没有显著的时间相关预测因素可以预测方案整合的变化。
年长患者经常使药物方案过于复杂,并且在 9 年的随访中用药剂量错误逐渐增多。文化程度有限、认知能力下降和多种合并症的患者发生错误的风险最高。美国老年学会杂志 68:569-575,2020。