• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字患者报告结局工具在糖尿病门诊常规护理中的可行性与可接受性:混合方法形成性预试验研究

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Tool in Routine Outpatient Diabetes Care: Mixed Methods Formative Pilot Study.

作者信息

Skovlund Soren E, Troelsen Lise Havbæk, Noergaard Lise Mellergaard, Pietraszek Anna, Jakobsen Poul Erik, Ejskjaer Niels

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 3;5(11):e28329. doi: 10.2196/28329.

DOI:10.2196/28329
PMID:34730545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8600435/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improvements in the digital capabilities of health systems provide new opportunities for the integration of patient-reported outcome (PRO) solutions in routine care, which can facilitate the delivery of person-centered diabetes care. We undertook this study as part of our development of a new digital PRO diabetes questionnaire and clinical dialog support tool for use by people with diabetes and their health care professionals (HCPs) to improve person-centered diabetes care quality and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived benefits and impacts of using a digital PRO diabetes tool, DiaProfil, in routine outpatient diabetes care.

METHODS

Overall, 12 people with diabetes scheduled for routine medical diabetes visits at the outpatient clinic were recruited. Purposive sampling was used to optimize heterogeneity regarding age, gender, duration, type of diabetes, treatment modality, and disease severity. Participants filled out a PRO diabetes questionnaire 2 to 5 days before their visit. During the visit, HCPs used a digital PRO tool to review PRO data with the person with diabetes for collaborative care planning. Participants completed evaluation forms before and after the visit and were interviewed for 30 to 45 minutes after the visit. HCPs completed the evaluation questionnaires after each visit. All visits were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Data were analyzed using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods analyses.

RESULTS

People with diabetes found the PRO diabetes questionnaire to be relevant, acceptable, and feasible to complete from home. People with diabetes and HCPs found the digital PRO tool to be feasible and acceptable for use during the diabetes visit and would like to continue using it. HCPs were able to use the tool in a person-centered manner, as intended. For several people with diabetes, completion of the questionnaire facilitated positive reflection and better preparation for the visit. The use of the PRO tool primarily improved the quality of the dialog by improving the identification and focus on the issues most important to the person with diabetes. People with diabetes did not report any negative aspects of the PRO tool, whereas HCPs highlighted that it was demanding when the person with diabetes had many PRO issues that required attention within the predefined time allocated for a visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The Danish PRO diabetes questionnaire and the digital tool, DiaProfil, are feasible and acceptable solutions for routine diabetes visits, and this tool may generate important benefits related to advancement of person-centered care. Further research is now required to corroborate and expand these formative insights on a larger scale and in diverse health care settings. The results of this study are therefore being used to define research hypotheses and finalize real-world PRO evaluation tools for a forthcoming large-scale multisector implementation study in Denmark.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65e/8600435/563f3b5a18de/formative_v5i11e28329_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65e/8600435/c912016667d4/formative_v5i11e28329_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65e/8600435/18f5d368ac84/formative_v5i11e28329_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65e/8600435/563f3b5a18de/formative_v5i11e28329_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65e/8600435/c912016667d4/formative_v5i11e28329_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65e/8600435/18f5d368ac84/formative_v5i11e28329_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65e/8600435/563f3b5a18de/formative_v5i11e28329_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

卫生系统数字能力的提升为将患者报告结局(PRO)解决方案整合到常规护理中提供了新机遇,这有助于提供以患者为中心的糖尿病护理。我们开展这项研究,作为开发一种新的数字PRO糖尿病问卷和临床对话支持工具的一部分,供糖尿病患者及其医护人员(HCP)使用,以提高以患者为中心的糖尿病护理质量和结局。

目的

本研究评估在常规门诊糖尿病护理中使用数字PRO糖尿病工具DiaProfil的可行性、可接受性以及感知到的益处和影响。

方法

总共招募了12名计划在门诊进行常规糖尿病医疗就诊的糖尿病患者。采用目的抽样法,以优化在年龄、性别、病程、糖尿病类型、治疗方式和疾病严重程度方面的异质性。参与者在就诊前2至5天填写一份PRO糖尿病问卷。就诊期间,医护人员使用数字PRO工具与糖尿病患者一起查看PRO数据,以进行协作护理规划。参与者在就诊前后完成评估表,并在就诊后接受30至45分钟的访谈。医护人员在每次就诊后完成评估问卷。所有就诊均进行录音并转录以供分析。使用定量、定性和混合方法分析数据。

结果

糖尿病患者认为PRO糖尿病问卷相关、可接受且可以在家中完成。糖尿病患者和医护人员发现数字PRO工具在糖尿病就诊期间使用是可行且可接受的,并希望继续使用。医护人员能够按预期以患者为中心的方式使用该工具。对一些糖尿病患者来说,完成问卷有助于进行积极反思并为就诊做好更好的准备。PRO工具的使用主要通过改善对糖尿病患者最重要问题的识别和关注,提高了对话质量。糖尿病患者未报告PRO工具的任何负面方面,而医护人员强调,当糖尿病患者有许多PRO问题需要在为就诊分配的预定义时间内关注时,该工具要求较高。

结论

丹麦的PRO糖尿病问卷和数字工具DiaProfil是常规糖尿病就诊的可行且可接受的解决方案,该工具可能会为以患者为中心的护理进步带来重要益处。现在需要进一步研究,以在更大规模和不同的医疗环境中证实并扩展这些形成性见解。因此,本研究的结果正用于确定研究假设,并为丹麦即将开展的大规模多部门实施研究确定实际的PRO评估工具。

相似文献

1
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Tool in Routine Outpatient Diabetes Care: Mixed Methods Formative Pilot Study.数字患者报告结局工具在糖尿病门诊常规护理中的可行性与可接受性:混合方法形成性预试验研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 3;5(11):e28329. doi: 10.2196/28329.
2
Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study.用于常规糖尿病护理的数字患者报告结局工具的感知益处、障碍和促进因素:一项全国性、多中心、混合方法实施研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 3;10(9):e28391. doi: 10.2196/28391.
3
Implementing the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire as a Clinical Tool in Routine Diabetes Care: Focus Group Discussions With Patients and Health Care Professionals.将数字糖尿病问卷作为常规糖尿病护理的临床工具加以应用:与患者及医疗保健专业人员的焦点小组讨论
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 May 25;7(2):e34561. doi: 10.2196/34561.
4
Can the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Improve the Delivery of Person-Centered Diabetes Care? A Review of Recent Developments and a Case Study.患者报告结局测量的常规使用能否改善以患者为中心的糖尿病护理的提供?近期进展回顾和案例研究。
Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Aug 16;19(9):84. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1190-x.
5
Feasibility of a Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Health Care, InvolveMe: Pilot Study.一项支持慢性医疗保健中共同决策的数字患者-医疗服务提供者沟通干预措施(InvolveMe)的可行性:试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 7;6(4):e34738. doi: 10.2196/34738.
6
Six-Month Pilot Testing of a Digital Health Tool to Support Effective Self-Care in People With Heart Failure: Mixed Methods Study.一项支持心力衰竭患者有效自我护理的数字健康工具的六个月试点测试:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 1;8:e52442. doi: 10.2196/52442.
7
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
8
Digital Monitoring and Management of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Cancer Immunotherapy and Its Impact on Quality of Clinical Care: Interview and Survey Study Among Health Care Professionals and Patients.采用癌症免疫疗法治疗的晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的数字监测和管理及其对临床护理质量的影响:医疗保健专业人员和患者的访谈和调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 21;22(12):e18655. doi: 10.2196/18655.
9
Empowerment, motivation, and medical adherence (EMMA): the feasibility of a program for patient-centered consultations to support medication adherence and blood glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes.赋权、动机与医疗依从性(EMMA):一项以患者为中心的咨询项目在支持2型糖尿病成人患者药物依从性和血糖控制方面的可行性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Sep 1;9:1243-53. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S85528. eCollection 2015.
10
The participatory development of a national core set of person-centred diabetes outcome constructs for use in routine diabetes care across healthcare sectors.为跨医疗保健部门的常规糖尿病护理制定一套以患者为中心的糖尿病结局指标的国家核心集的参与式开发。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 10;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00309-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Clinicians' and Patients' Acceptance and Utilization of a Digital Solution to Support Individualized Care in Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Qualitative Study.探索临床医生和患者对支持糖尿病专科门诊个性化护理的数字解决方案(DigiDiaS)的接受度和使用率:定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 8;12:e70301. doi: 10.2196/70301.
2
Empowering Capabilities of People With Chronic Conditions Supported by Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.数字健康技术支持下慢性病患者的能力赋能:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 27;27:e68458. doi: 10.2196/68458.
3
Community-Based Intelligent Blood Glucose Management for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Based on the Health Belief Model: Randomized Controlled Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
The participatory development of a national core set of person-centred diabetes outcome constructs for use in routine diabetes care across healthcare sectors.为跨医疗保健部门的常规糖尿病护理制定一套以患者为中心的糖尿病结局指标的国家核心集的参与式开发。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 10;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00309-7.
2
Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study.用于常规糖尿病护理的数字患者报告结局工具的感知益处、障碍和促进因素:一项全国性、多中心、混合方法实施研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 3;10(9):e28391. doi: 10.2196/28391.
3
基于健康信念模型的社区老年人2型糖尿病智能血糖管理:随机对照试验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jun 19;13:e60227. doi: 10.2196/60227.
4
Defining patient-reported outcomes in diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease for clinical practice guidelines - perspectives of the taskforce of the Guideline Workshop.为临床实践指南界定糖尿病、肥胖症、心血管疾病及慢性肾脏病患者报告的结局——指南研讨会特别工作组的观点
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Feb 7;24(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02550-2.
5
Integrating general practitioners' and patients' perspectives in the development of a digital tool supporting primary care for older patients with multimorbidity: a focus group study.在开发支持患有多种疾病的老年患者初级保健的数字工具过程中整合全科医生和患者的观点:一项焦点小组研究
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jan 21;7:1499333. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1499333. eCollection 2025.
6
Mixed methods study on the feasibility of implementing periodic continuous glucose monitoring among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting.在初级保健机构中,对2型糖尿病患者实施定期连续血糖监测可行性的混合方法研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(8):e29498. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29498. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
7
Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review.糖尿病门诊护理中的患者报告结局测量:范围综述。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Nov;11(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628.
8
Implementation of Psychosocial Screening into Diabetes Clinics: Experience from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Network.将心理社会筛查纳入糖尿病诊所的实施:来自 1 型糖尿病交换质量改进网络的经验。
Curr Diab Rep. 2023 Feb;23(2):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01497-6. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
Adapting a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Digital Outpatient Specialist Health Care Services for Type 1 Diabetes: User Involvement Study.将患者报告的结局测量方法应用于1型糖尿病数字门诊专科医疗服务:用户参与研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Nov 15;9(4):e38678. doi: 10.2196/38678.
10
Patient, provider, and nurse preferences of patient reported outcomes (PRO) and side effect management during cancer treatment of underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups, rural and economically disadvantaged patients: a mixed methods study.代表性不足的少数族裔和少数民族群体、农村和经济贫困患者在癌症治疗过程中患者报告结局(PRO)和副作用管理方面的患者、提供者和护士偏好:一项混合方法研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Sep;33(9):1193-1205. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01605-7. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
Nurses' and physicians' experiences with diabetes consultations and the use of dialogue tools in the DiaPROM pilot trial: A qualitative study.
护士和医生在 DiaPROM 试点试验中进行糖尿病咨询的经验以及对话工具的使用:一项定性研究。
Diabet Med. 2021 Jun;38(6):e14419. doi: 10.1111/dme.14419. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
The development of PROmunication: a training-tool for clinicians using patient-reported outcomes to promote patient-centred communication in clinical cancer settings.PROmunication的开发:一种供临床医生使用患者报告结果以促进临床癌症环境中以患者为中心沟通的培训工具。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Feb 11;4(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-0174-6.
5
An Effective Model of Diabetes Care and Education: Revising the AADE7 Self-Care Behaviors.一种有效的糖尿病护理和教育模式:修订 AADE7 自我护理行为。
Diabetes Educ. 2020 Apr;46(2):139-160. doi: 10.1177/0145721719894903. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
6
Patient-reported outcome measures in the interaction between patient and clinician - a multi-perspective qualitative study.患者与临床医生互动中的患者报告结局测量——一项多视角定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jan 9;4(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0170-x.
7
Evaluation of provider documentation patterns as a tool to deliver ongoing patient-centred diabetes education and support.评估提供者文件记录模式,作为提供持续以患者为中心的糖尿病教育和支持的工具。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Mar;74(3):e13451. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13451. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
8
Implementing person-centered communication in diabetes care: a new tool for diabetes care professionals.在糖尿病护理中实施以患者为中心的沟通:糖尿病护理专业人员的新工具。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Aug 26;13:1443-1450. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S214092. eCollection 2019.
9
Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: an international multistakeholder initiative.共同制定药物研发患者参与质量指南:一项国际多利益相关方倡议。
BMJ Innov. 2019 Jan;5(1):43-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000317. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
10
Empowerment of patients with type 2 diabetes: current perspectives.2型糖尿病患者的赋权:当前观点
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019 Aug 6;12:1311-1321. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S174910. eCollection 2019.