Walker Jerilyn A, Jordan Vallmer E, Storer Jessica M, Steely Cody J, Gonzalez-Quiroga Paulina, Beckstrom Thomas O, Rewerts Lydia C, St Romain Corey P, Rockwell Catherine E, Rogers Jeffrey, Jolly Clifford J, Konkel Miriam K, Batzer Mark A
1Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, 202 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803 USA.
2Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Mob DNA. 2019 Nov 26;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13100-019-0187-y. eCollection 2019.
Baboons (genus ) and geladas () are now generally recognized as close phylogenetic relatives, though morphologically quite distinct and generally classified in separate genera. Primate specific retrotransposons are well-established genomic markers for the study of phylogenetic and population genetic relationships. We previously reported a computational reconstruction of phylogeny using large-scale whole genome sequence (WGS) analysis of insertion polymorphisms. Recently, high coverage WGS was generated for The objective of this study was to apply the high-throughput "poly-Detect" method to computationally determine the number of insertion polymorphisms shared by and , and vice versa, by each individual species and . Secondly, we performed locus-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays on a diverse DNA panel to complement the computational data.
We identified 27,700 insertions from WGS that were also present among six species, with nearly half (12,956) remaining unfixed among 12 individuals. Similarly, each of the six species had species-indicative insertions that were also present in . In general, shared more insertion polymorphisms with than did any of the other five species. PCR-based genotype data provided additional support for the computational findings.
Our discovery that several thousand insertion polymorphisms are shared by and baboons suggests a much more permeable reproductive barrier between the two genera then previously suspected. Their intertwined evolution likely involves a long history of admixture, gene flow and incomplete lineage sorting.
狒狒属( )和狮尾狒属( )现在普遍被认为是亲缘关系很近的系统发育亲属,尽管它们在形态上有很大差异,并且通常被归类于不同的属。灵长类特异性逆转录转座子是研究系统发育和群体遗传关系的成熟基因组标记。我们之前报道了利用对插入多态性的大规模全基因组序列(WGS)分析对 系统发育进行的计算重建。最近,已生成了 属的高覆盖度WGS。本研究的目的是应用高通量“多检测”方法,通过计算确定 属和 属共有的插入多态性数量,反之亦然,以及每个 属物种和每个 属物种各自的插入多态性数量。其次,我们对不同的DNA样本进行了位点特异性聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,以补充计算数据。
我们从 属的WGS中鉴定出27,700个插入,这些插入在六个 属物种中也存在,其中近一半(12,956个)在12个 属个体中仍未固定。同样,六个 属物种中的每一个都有在 属中也存在的物种指示性插入。一般来说, 属与 属共享的插入多态性比与其他五个 属物种中的任何一个都多。基于PCR的基因型数据为计算结果提供了额外支持。
我们发现 属和狒狒属共享数千个插入多态性,这表明这两个属之间的生殖屏障比之前怀疑的要更具渗透性。它们相互交织的进化可能涉及长期的混合、基因流动和不完全的谱系分选历史。