社交媒体在心力衰竭中的应用：一项混合方法系统评价。

Social Media in Heart Failure: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(2):161-170. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666191210143657.

DOI:10.2174/1573403X15666191210143657

PMID:31820703

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8226208/

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among social media (SoMe) platforms, Twitter and YouTube have gained popularity, facilitating communication between cardiovascular professionals and patients.

OBJECTIVE

This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to assess the source profile and content of Twitter and YouTube posts about heart failure (HF).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Medline using the terms "cardiology," "social media," and "heart failure". We included full-text manuscripts published between January 1, 1999, and April 14, 2019. We searched Twitter and YouTube for posts using the hashtags "#heartfailure", "#HF", or "#CHF" on May 15, 2019 and July 6, 2019. We performed a descriptive analysis of the data.

RESULTS

Three publications met inclusion criteria, providing 677 tweets for source profile analysis; institutions (54.8%), health professionals (26.6%), and patients (19.4%) were the most common source profiles. The publications provided 1,194 tweets for content analysis: 83.3% were on education for professionals; 33.7% were on patient empowerment; and 22.3% were on research promotion. Our search on Twitter and YouTube generated 2,252 tweets and > 400 videos, of which we analyzed 260 tweets and 260 videos. Sources included institutions (53.5% Twitter, 64.2% You- Tube), health professionals (42.3%, 28.5%), and patients (4.2%, 7.3%). Content included education for professionals (39.2% Twitter, 62.3% YouTube), patient empowerment (20.4%, 21.9%), research promotion (28.8%, 13.1%), professional advocacy (5.8%, 2.7%), and research collaboration (5.8%, 0%).

CONCLUSION

Twitter and YouTube are platforms for knowledge translation in HF, with contributions from institutions, health professionals, and less commonly, from patients. Both focus largely on education for professionals and less commonly on patient empowerment. Twitter includes more research promotion, research collaboration, and professional advocacy than YouTube.

摘要

背景

在社交媒体（SoMe）平台中，Twitter 和 YouTube 越来越受欢迎，为心血管专业人员与患者之间的交流提供了便利。

目的

本混合方法系统评价旨在评估关于心力衰竭（HF）的 Twitter 和 YouTube 帖子的来源和内容。

方法

我们使用“心脏病学”、“社交媒体”和“心力衰竭”等术语在 PubMed、Embase 和 Medline 中进行搜索。我们纳入了 1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 14 日期间发表的全文文献。我们于 2019 年 5 月 15 日和 7 月 6 日在 Twitter 和 YouTube 上使用“#heartfailure”、“#HF”或“#CHF”标签搜索帖子。我们对数据进行了描述性分析。

结果

有 3 篇出版物符合纳入标准，为来源分析提供了 677 条推文；机构（54.8%）、卫生专业人员（26.6%）和患者（19.4%）是最常见的来源。这些出版物为内容分析提供了 1194 条推文：83.3%是针对专业人员的教育；33.7%是关于患者赋权；22.3%是关于研究推广。我们在 Twitter 和 YouTube 上的搜索生成了 2252 条推文和 >400 个视频，我们分析了其中的 260 条推文和 260 个视频。来源包括机构（Twitter 为 53.5%，YouTube 为 64.2%）、卫生专业人员（Twitter 为 42.3%，YouTube 为 28.5%）和患者（Twitter 为 4.2%，YouTube 为 7.3%）。内容包括专业人员教育（Twitter 为 39.2%，YouTube 为 62.3%）、患者赋权（Twitter 为 20.4%，YouTube 为 21.9%）、研究推广（Twitter 为 28.8%，YouTube 为 13.1%）、专业倡导（Twitter 为 5.8%，YouTube 为 2.7%）和研究合作（Twitter 为 5.8%，YouTube 为 0%）。