• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Driver safety in patients with primary brain tumors.原发性脑肿瘤患者的驾驶安全
Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Dec;6(6):490-498. doi: 10.1093/nop/npz014. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
Validity of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory in predicting driving outcome.
Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jul-Aug;60(4):420-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.4.420.
3
Impact of partial administration of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory on concurrent validity for people with brain injury.认知行为驾驶员量表部分施测对脑损伤患者同时效度的影响。
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;64(2):279-87. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.279.
4
Use of the CBDI to detect malingering when malingerers do their "homework".当诈病者做了“功课”时,使用CBDI来检测诈病情况。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Jan;18(1):57-69.
5
Identifying at-risk older adult community-dwelling drivers through neuropsychological evaluation.通过神经心理学评估识别有风险的社区居住老年驾驶员。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2009 Oct;16(4):281-7. doi: 10.1080/09084280903297826.
6
Driving skills in elderly persons with stroke: comparison of two new assessment options.中风老年患者的驾驶技能:两种新评估方法的比较
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jun;81(6):701-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90096-0.
7
Ability of the Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory to distinguish malingerers from brain-damaged subjects.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1997;12(5):491-503.
8
Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk-taking preference, and common bile duct injuries.风险承受能力与胆管损伤:外科医生特征、冒险偏好及胆总管损伤
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jul;209(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.063. Epub 2009 May 1.
9
Relationship between neuropsychological tests and driver's license renewal tests in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病中神经心理学测试与驾照更新测试之间的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 17;19(2):125-132. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1360491. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
10
On-road driving test performance in veterans: Effects of age, clinical diagnosis and cognitive measures.退役军人的路考表现:年龄、临床诊断和认知测量的影响。
J Safety Res. 2021 Jun;77:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain tumors and fitness to drive: A review and multi-disciplinary approach.脑肿瘤与驾驶适宜性:综述与多学科方法
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Dec 6;12(2):183-196. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae119. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
A systematic review of the impact of brain tumours on risk of motor vehicle crashes.脑肿瘤对机动车事故风险影响的系统评价。
J Neurooncol. 2024 Feb;166(3):395-405. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04586-6. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3
Telehealth group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in primary brain tumor: Primary outcomes from a single-arm phase II feasibility and proof-of-concept trial.远程医疗组对原发性脑肿瘤的认知行为疗法(CBT-I):一项单臂 II 期可行性和概念验证试验的主要结果。
Neuro Oncol. 2024 Mar 4;26(3):516-527. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noad193.

本文引用的文献

1
Tumor-related neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with diffuse glioma: a systematic review of neurocognitive functioning prior to anti-tumor treatment.弥漫性胶质瘤患者的肿瘤相关神经认知功能障碍:抗肿瘤治疗前神经认知功能的系统评价
J Neurooncol. 2017 Aug;134(1):9-18. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2503-z. Epub 2017 May 31.
2
Neuropsychological Assessment of Driving Capacity.驾驶能力的神经心理学评估。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;31(6):517-29. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw050. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
3
Driving assessment and rehabilitation using a driving simulator in individuals with traumatic brain injury: A scoping review.使用驾驶模拟器对创伤性脑损伤患者进行驾驶评估与康复:一项范围综述。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 30;39(2):239-51. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161354.
4
Cognitive Tests and Determining Fitness to Drive in Dementia: A Systematic Review.认知测试与痴呆患者驾驶适宜性的判定:一项系统综述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Sep;64(9):1904-17. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14180. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
5
Neurocognitive Changes Associated With Surgical Resection of Left and Right Temporal Lobe Glioma.与左、右颞叶胶质瘤手术切除相关的神经认知变化
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):777-85. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000987.
6
Monitoring and optimising cognitive function in cancer patients: Present knowledge and future directions.癌症患者认知功能的监测与优化:当前认知与未来方向
EJC Suppl. 2014 Jun;12(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 May 29.
7
Cognitive functioning differentially predicts different dimensions of older drivers' on-road safety.认知功能对老年驾驶员道路安全的不同维度具有不同的预测作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:236-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
8
Driving after traumatic brain injury: evaluation and rehabilitation interventions.创伤性脑损伤后的驾驶能力:评估与康复干预
Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2014 Sep;2(3):176-183. doi: 10.1007/s40141-014-0055-0.
9
Relationships between tumor grade and neurocognitive functioning in patients with glioma of the left temporal lobe prior to surgical resection.左颞叶胶质瘤患者手术切除前肿瘤分级与神经认知功能的关系。
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Apr;17(4):580-7. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou233. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
10
Epilepsy and driving: potential impact of transient impaired consciousness.癫痫与驾驶:短暂意识障碍的潜在影响。
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Jan;30:50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.09.024.

原发性脑肿瘤患者的驾驶安全

Driver safety in patients with primary brain tumors.

作者信息

Estevis Eduardo, Noll Kyle R, Bradshaw Mariana E, Wefel Jeffrey S

机构信息

Neuroscience Institute, DHR Health, Edinburg, Texas.

Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

出版信息

Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Dec;6(6):490-498. doi: 10.1093/nop/npz014. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1093/nop/npz014
PMID:31832220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6899044/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Operating a motor vehicle involves multiple cognitive and sensorimotor faculties. Neurological conditions pose driving risk, but this has not been examined in patients with primary brain tumors.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with primary brain tumors (32 left hemisphere; 69% glioblastoma) completed the Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory (CBDI). A subset also completed broader cognitive testing. Patient characteristics, CBDI measures, and broader neuropsychological test scores were compared between Passing and Nonpassing groups. Follow-up logistic regression analyses identified patient characteristics and CBDI measures predictive of Pass/Nonpass outcome. Point-biserial correlations determined associations between neuropsychological tests and CBDI outcome.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine percent of patients were classified as passing the CBDI. Nonpassing patients were older and more likely to have WHO grade IV and temporal lobe tumors. Age was the most salient predictor of CBDI performance. CBDI measures of speeded visual search and set-shifting, speeded response inhibition, vigilance and freedom from distractibility, and basic visual scanning speed were predictive of Pass/Nonpass outcome. Neuropsychological tests of memory in particular, but also speeded visual scanning and discrimination, executive function, basic visual attention, visuoconstruction, and manual dexterity (dominant hand), were associated with CBDI outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A sizeable proportion of patients with primary brain tumors appear at risk of driving difficulty, particularly those with higher-grade tumors and of older age. Memory, visual attention, and executive difficulties appear to contribute most to driving safety risk as determined by the CBDI. These results highlight the importance of driving safety screening in this population.

摘要

背景

驾驶机动车涉及多种认知和感觉运动能力。神经系统疾病会带来驾驶风险,但原发性脑肿瘤患者的这一情况尚未得到研究。

方法

64例原发性脑肿瘤患者(32例左半球;69%为胶质母细胞瘤)完成了认知行为驾驶能力量表(CBDI)测试。其中一部分患者还完成了更广泛的认知测试。比较了通过组和未通过组患者的特征、CBDI测量结果以及更广泛的神经心理学测试分数。后续的逻辑回归分析确定了预测通过/未通过结果的患者特征和CBDI测量指标。点二列相关分析确定了神经心理学测试与CBDI结果之间的关联。

结果

69%的患者被归类为通过CBDI测试。未通过测试的患者年龄更大,更有可能患有世界卫生组织IV级肿瘤和颞叶肿瘤。年龄是CBDI表现的最显著预测因素。CBDI中快速视觉搜索和任务转换、快速反应抑制、警觉性和抗分心能力以及基本视觉扫描速度的测量指标可预测通过/未通过结果。特别是记忆方面的神经心理学测试,以及快速视觉扫描和辨别、执行功能、基本视觉注意力、视觉构建和手部灵活性(优势手)与CBDI结果相关。

结论

相当一部分原发性脑肿瘤患者似乎存在驾驶困难的风险,尤其是那些肿瘤分级较高和年龄较大的患者。记忆、视觉注意力和执行功能方面的困难似乎是导致CBDI确定的驾驶安全风险的主要因素。这些结果凸显了对这一人群进行驾驶安全筛查的重要性。