• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康纳-戴维森韧性量表(CD-RISC)在西班牙普通人群中跨性别和年龄的测量不变性。

Measurement invariance across gender and age in the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Spanish general population.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Universidad de Jaén, Campus las Lagunillas S/N, 23071, Jaén, Spain.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2020 May;29(5):1373-1384. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02389-1. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-019-02389-1
PMID:31845166
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examines the adjustment of different equivalent measurement models for the factorial structures of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), which have shown a good fit to data from the general population. Furthermore, we examine measurement invariance (MI) based on gender and age.

METHOD

A total of 1011 Spanish individuals (52.40% female) completed the CD-RISC.

RESULTS

The results indicated that the 10-item single-factor model was the only model that fit the data. Significant latent mean differences showed that the levels of resilience among women were significantly lower than those among men. Regarding age, uniform MI was confirmed, showing the homogeneity of the population.

CONCLUSIONS

Our exhaustive review of the extant published studies that address factor analyses and gender and age differences demonstrates that the results vary greatly. Furthermore, our model test comparison finds that the 10-item model is the best in the Spanish population. Moreover, men show higher resilience than women, while age is not a decisive variable, most likely showing that life events are more important than these demographic variables.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了康纳-戴维森韧性量表(CD-RISC)的不同等效测量模型对其因子结构的调整,这些模型在一般人群的数据中表现出良好的拟合度。此外,我们还基于性别和年龄检验了测量不变性(MI)。

方法

共有 1011 名西班牙个体(52.40%为女性)完成了 CD-RISC。

结果

结果表明,10 项单因素模型是唯一拟合数据的模型。显著的潜在均值差异表明,女性的韧性水平明显低于男性。关于年龄,确认了统一的 MI,表明人群具有同质性。

结论

我们对现有发表的关于因子分析以及性别和年龄差异的研究进行了详尽的回顾,结果表明差异非常大。此外,我们的模型测试比较发现,10 项模型在西班牙人群中是最佳的。此外,男性比女性表现出更高的韧性,而年龄不是一个决定性的变量,这很可能表明生活事件比这些人口统计学变量更为重要。

相似文献

1
Measurement invariance across gender and age in the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Spanish general population.康纳-戴维森韧性量表(CD-RISC)在西班牙普通人群中跨性别和年龄的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2020 May;29(5):1373-1384. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02389-1. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in Spanish Adolescents.《Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(CD-RISC)在西班牙青少年中的心理测量特性》
Span J Psychol. 2024 Feb 5;27:e3. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2024.3.
3
Psychometric properties of two abbreviated Connor-Davidson Resilience scales in Chinese infertile couples.中文版康纳-戴维森韧性量表在不孕夫妇中应用的心理测量学特性。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2405-2414. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02820-6. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
4
Psychometric properties of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) in Chinese undergraduates and depressive patients.中文版康耐尔-戴维森韧性量表(CD-RISC-10)在大学生和抑郁患者中的心理测量特性。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 15;261:211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.018. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
5
Validity and Longitudinal Invariance of the 10-Item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) in Chinese Left-Behind and Non-Left-Behind Children.留守与非留守儿童 10 项 Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(CD-RISC-10)的有效性和纵向不变性。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Aug;125(4):2274-2291. doi: 10.1177/00332941211013531. Epub 2021 May 26.
6
Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (10-item CD-RISC) in young adults.10 项 Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(10 项 CD-RISC)西班牙语版在年轻成年人中的信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Aug 5;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-63.
7
Psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a non-clinical population in Sweden.康纳-戴维森韧性量表(CD-RISC)在瑞典非临床人群中的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 12;18(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01383-3.
8
An in-depth psychometric analysis of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: calibration with Rasch-Andrich model.康纳-戴维森韧性量表的深入心理测量分析:基于拉施-安德里奇模型的校准
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Sep 23;13:154. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0345-y.
9
[Validity of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (10 items) in a population of elderly].康纳-戴维森心理韧性量表(10项)在老年人群中的效度
Enferm Clin. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2012.11.006. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
10
Normative data and psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the abbreviated version (CD-RISC2) among the general population in Hong Kong.香港普通人群中康纳-戴维森韧性量表(CD-RISC)及其简版(CD-RISC2)的常模数据和心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jan;25(1):111-6. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1072-x. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Trajectories of Child and Caregiver Positive Coping Following a Brief Emotion-Focused Family Therapy (EFFT) Intervention.简短的以情绪为中心的家庭治疗(EFFT)干预后儿童和照顾者积极应对的轨迹
J Marital Fam Ther. 2025 Jul;51(3):e70029. doi: 10.1111/jmft.70029.
2
Psychological resilience, athletic experience, and competitive level of judokas. A transversal study.柔道运动员的心理韧性、运动经历和竞技水平。一项横断面研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1440412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440412. eCollection 2024.
3
Family Support, Resilience, and Life Goals of Young People in Residential Care.
寄养照料中青少年的家庭支持、心理韧性与生活目标
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;14(7):581. doi: 10.3390/bs14070581.
4
Chain mediation model of consultation empathy, resilience and resignation coping on depression: a cross-sectional study among patients with COVID-19 in China.咨询共情、韧性和屈服应对对抑郁的链式中介模型:中国 COVID-19 患者的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 8;13(11):e079050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079050.
5
Validity and Reliability of Cultural Mix Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations among Healthcare Professionals in Ghana Amidst COVID-19.文化混合应对策略量表在加纳 COVID-19 期间医护人员应对压力情境的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(17):10651. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710651.
6
Relation between resilience and personality traits: The role of hopelessness and age.韧性与人格特质的关系:绝望感和年龄的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2023 Feb;64(1):53-59. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12866. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
7
Social determinants of vulnerability in the population of reproductive age: a systematic review.生殖年龄段人群脆弱性的社会决定因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;22(1):1252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13651-6.
8
Do psychological strengths protect college students confined by COVID-19 to emotional distress? The role of gender.心理优势能否保护因新冠疫情而受困的大学生免受情绪困扰?性别的作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Mar;171:110507. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110507. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Resilience and job satisfaction among out-of-hospital emergency medical service professionals: A cross-sectional multi-centric study.院外急救医疗专业人员的韧性和工作满意度:一项跨中心横断面研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Sep;30(6):2084-2092. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13645. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
10
Psychometric validity and reliability of the 10- and 2-item Connor-Davidson resilience scales among a national sample of Americans responding to the Covid-19 pandemic: an item response theory analysis.在一项针对美国应对新冠疫情的全国性样本中,10 项和 2 项康纳-戴维森韧性量表的心理测量学效度和信度:项目反应理论分析。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Sep;31(9):2819-2836. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03125-y. Epub 2022 Apr 2.