• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习在急诊科初步分诊中预测感染性休克。

Machine learning for prediction of septic shock at initial triage in emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si 463-707, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, 59, Yatap-ro, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Seongnam-si 463-712, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2020 Feb;55:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.024
PMID:31734491
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized utilizing machine learning (ML) algorithms for screening septic shock in ED would provide better accuracy than qSOFA or MEWS.

METHODS

The study population was adult (≥20 years) patients visiting ED for suspected infection. Target event was septic shock within 24 h after arrival. Demographics, vital signs, level of consciousness, chief complaints (CC) and initial blood test results were used as predictors. CC were embedded into 16-dimensional vector space using singular value decomposition. Six base learners including support vector machine, gradient-boosting machine, random forest, multivariate adaptive regression splines and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and ridge regression and their ensembles were tested. We also trained and tested MLP networks with various setting.

RESULTS

A total of 49,560 patients were included and 4817 (9.7%) had septic shock within 24 h. All ML classifiers significantly outperformed qSOFA score, MEWS and their age-sex adjusted versions with their AUROC ranging from 0.883 to 0.929. The ensembles of the base classifiers showed the best performance and addition of CC embedding was associated with statistically significant increases in performance.

CONCLUSIONS

ML classifiers significantly outperforms clinical scores in screening septic shock at ED triage.

摘要

背景

我们假设利用机器学习(ML)算法对 ED 中的脓毒症休克进行筛选,其准确性将优于 qSOFA 或 MEWS。

方法

研究人群为因疑似感染而就诊 ED 的成年(≥20 岁)患者。目标事件为到达后 24 小时内发生的脓毒症休克。使用人口统计学、生命体征、意识水平、主要症状(CC)和初始血液检查结果作为预测因素。CC 使用奇异值分解嵌入到 16 维向量空间中。测试了包括支持向量机、梯度提升机、随机森林、多变量自适应回归样条和最小绝对值收缩和选择算子以及岭回归及其集成在内的 6 个基本学习器。我们还使用不同的设置训练和测试了 MLP 网络。

结果

共纳入 49560 例患者,其中 4817 例(9.7%)在 24 小时内发生脓毒症休克。所有 ML 分类器均显著优于 qSOFA 评分、MEWS 及其年龄性别调整版本,其 AUC 范围为 0.883 至 0.929。基本分类器的集成表现最佳,并且 CC 嵌入的添加与性能的统计学显著提高相关。

结论

ML 分类器在 ED 分诊中筛查脓毒症休克的表现明显优于临床评分。

相似文献

1
Machine learning for prediction of septic shock at initial triage in emergency department.机器学习在急诊科初步分诊中预测感染性休克。
J Crit Care. 2020 Feb;55:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
2
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
3
Enhancement in Performance of Septic Shock Prediction Using National Early Warning Score, Initial Triage Information, and Machine Learning Analysis.利用国家早期预警评分、初步分诊信息和机器学习分析提高脓毒性休克预测性能。
J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;61(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.01.038. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Heart rate variability based machine learning models for risk prediction of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department.基于心率变异性的机器学习模型用于急诊科疑似脓毒症患者的风险预测
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14197. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014197.
5
Machine learning algorithms for early sepsis detection in the emergency department: A retrospective study.机器学习算法在急诊科早期脓毒症检测中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104689. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104689. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
7
A Gradient Boosting Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Mortality in the Emergency Department Triage: Devising a Nine-Point Triage Score.一种用于预测急诊科分诊早期死亡率的梯度提升机器学习模型:设计九点分诊评分。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):220-227. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05512-7. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
A novel heart rate variability based risk prediction model for septic patients presenting to the emergency department.一种针对急诊科脓毒症患者的基于心率变异性的新型风险预测模型。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(23):e10866. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010866.
9
Clinical Scores and Formal Triage for Screening of Sepsis and Adverse Outcomes on Arrival in an Emergency Department All-Comer Cohort.急诊科全人群队列中用于筛查脓毒症及入院时不良结局的临床评分与正式分诊
J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):453-460.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Data-Driven Early Warning Systems for Sepsis Recognition and Intervention in Emergency Care: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Outcomes.数据驱动的脓毒症识别与急诊护理干预早期预警系统的进展:诊断性能与临床结局的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Aug 12;17(8):e89882. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89882. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Early Prediction of Septic Shock in Emergency Department Using Serum Metabolites.利用血清代谢物在急诊科对感染性休克进行早期预测。
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2025 Jun 4;36(6):1264-1276. doi: 10.1021/jasms.5c00009. Epub 2025 May 9.
3
The role of artificial intelligence in sepsis in the Emergency Department: a narrative review.
人工智能在急诊科脓毒症中的作用:一项叙述性综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2025 Feb 28;13(1):4. doi: 10.21037/atm-24-150. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Development of continuous warning system for timely prediction of septic shock.用于及时预测脓毒性休克的连续预警系统的开发。
Front Physiol. 2024 Nov 20;15:1389693. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1389693. eCollection 2024.
5
Prediction of sepsis within 24 hours at the triage stage in emergency departments using machine learning.利用机器学习在急诊科分诊阶段预测24小时内的脓毒症。
World J Emerg Med. 2024;15(5):379-385. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.074.
6
Diagnostic performance of machine-learning algorithms for sepsis prediction: An updated meta-analysis.机器学习算法在脓毒症预测中的诊断性能:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(6):4291-4307. doi: 10.3233/THC-240087.
7
Machine learning based prediction models for analyzing risk factors in patients with acute abdominal pain: a retrospective study.基于机器学习的急性腹痛患者危险因素分析预测模型:一项回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 5;11:1354925. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1354925. eCollection 2024.
8
Comparison between XGboost model and logistic regression model for predicting sepsis after extremely severe burns.用于预测特重度烧伤后脓毒症的XGBoost模型与逻辑回归模型的比较。
J Int Med Res. 2024 May;52(5):3000605241247696. doi: 10.1177/03000605241247696.
9
Real-time machine learning-assisted sepsis alert enhances the timeliness of antibiotic administration and diagnostic accuracy in emergency department patients with sepsis: a cluster-randomized trial.实时机器学习辅助脓毒症预警可提高急诊科脓毒症患者抗生素使用的及时性和诊断准确性:一项集群随机试验。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;19(5):1415-1424. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03535-5. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
10
Development and validation of a machine learning model integrated with the clinical workflow for early detection of sepsis.一种与临床工作流程相结合用于早期检测脓毒症的机器学习模型的开发与验证。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 23;10:1284081. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1284081. eCollection 2023.