Karp K, Teien D, Eriksson P
Department of Clinical Physiology, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Acta Med Scand. 1988;224(4):337-42. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1988.tb19592.x.
Non-invasive estimation of the mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was accomplished by simultaneous electrocardiographic, phonocardiographic and continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic recordings. The interval from the onset of the QRS complex to the Doppler determined mitral valve closure (Q-MC) and the interval from the phonocardiographic aortic component of the second heart sound to the Doppler determined mitral valve opening (A2-MO) were measured. The non-invasive registrations were carried out simultaneously with direct measurements of the wedge pressure. In an initial group of 22 patients, a significant correlation was observed between the intervals alone and the wedge pressure, r = 0.60, SEE = +/- 6.9 mmHg, p less than 0.01, for the Q-MC interval and r = -0.70, SEE = 6.2 mmHg, p less than 0.001 for the A2-MO interval. A closer correlation was observed between the ratio Q-MC/A2-MO and the measured wedge pressure, r = 0.93, SEE = +/- 3.1 mmHg, p less than 0.001. The linear regression equation, PCW = 19.5 (Q-MC/A2-MO) + 3.0 (mmHg), was applied prospectively to a second group of 23 patients. Again the relationship between estimated and measured wedge pressure was highly significant, r = 0.90, SEE = +/- 3.1 mmHg, p less than 0.001. Twenty-two patients were also studied during an exercise test, and acceptable non-invasive recordings were obtained in 19 of them. The change in estimated wedge pressure during activity related closely to the change in actual wedge pressure, r = 0.80, SEE = +/- 5.7 mmHg, p less than 0.001. A simplified equation suitable for routine clinical practice, PCW = 24 (Q-MC/A2-MO) (mmHg), yielded almost equally accurate estimates of the wedge pressure over a wide range of pressures. The simplicity and reasonable accuracy of Doppler-assisted estimation of the wedge pressure makes it useful in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with suspected cardiac disorders. The method may assist in evaluating the effects of diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, since it is sufficiently sensitive to detect acute directional changes in wedge pressure.
通过同步心电图、心音图和连续波多普勒超声心动图记录实现了平均肺毛细血管楔压的无创估计。测量了从QRS波群起始到多普勒确定的二尖瓣关闭(Q-MC)的间期,以及从心音图第二心音主动脉成分到多普勒确定的二尖瓣开放(A2-MO)的间期。无创记录与楔压的直接测量同时进行。在最初的22例患者中,单独的间期与楔压之间观察到显著相关性,Q-MC间期r = 0.60,标准误(SEE)=±6.9 mmHg,p<0.01;A2-MO间期r = -0.70,SEE = 6.2 mmHg,p<0.001。观察到Q-MC/A2-MO比值与测量的楔压之间有更密切的相关性,r = 0.93,SEE =±3.1 mmHg,p<0.001。线性回归方程PCW = 19.5(Q-MC/A2-MO)+ 3.0(mmHg)被前瞻性地应用于第二组23例患者。估计的楔压与测量的楔压之间的关系再次高度显著,r = 0.90,SEE =±3.1 mmHg,p<0.001。22例患者还在运动试验期间进行了研究,其中19例获得了可接受的无创记录。活动期间估计楔压的变化与实际楔压的变化密切相关,r = 0.80,SEE =±5.7 mmHg,p<0.001。一个适用于常规临床实践的简化方程PCW = 24(Q-MC/A2-MO)(mmHg),在很宽的压力范围内对楔压的估计几乎同样准确。多普勒辅助估计楔压的简单性和合理准确性使其在疑似心脏疾病患者的评估和随访中很有用。该方法可能有助于评估诊断或治疗程序的效果,因为它足够敏感以检测楔压的急性方向变化。