Xie Yanjun, Orabi Norman A, Zwolan Terry A, Basura Gregory J
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan.
School of Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Nov 22;4(6):693-702. doi: 10.1002/lio2.331. eCollection 2019 Dec.
(a) Determine the demographic and medical risk factors for patients who presented with unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL); (b) identify treatments that patients underwent; (c) evaluate the adequacy of follow-up and compliance with long-term hearing rehabilitation.
Retrospective review of patients who presented with unilateral ISSNHL between January 1998 and December 2017 at a tertiary care academic medical center.
Two hundred-four patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 129 (63.2%) did not undergo treatment at an outside hospital prior to our evaluation. In this subgroup, the average pretreatment pure tone average (PTA) was 61.9 ± 2.5 dB (dB). The most common treatment was oral steroids and was recommended in 76 patients (59.9%). Patients also underwent intratympanic (IT) steroid injections (7.2%) or oral steroids followed by salvage IT injections (19.4%). Mean follow-up duration was 17.9 (±29.2) months, and posttreatment PTA (45.6 ± 2.6 dB) was significantly better than baseline ( < .001). In this cohort, hearing amplification was infrequently recommended. Less than 20% of patients reported active hearing amplification use at their most recent visit. At follow-up, 90 patients (69.8%) reported subjective improvement in hearing after treatment. Only 55 patients (42.6%) showed improvement in PTA compared to their pretreatment audiograms.
Many patients with ISSNHL experienced audiometric improvement after treatments, but most had persistent hearing loss. The duration of follow-up was short. Most patients did not use long-term hearing amplification. Future studies are needed to identify factors that contribute to reduced follow-up and low compliance with hearing amplification use in ISSNHL.
2c.
(a) 确定单侧特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失(ISSNHL)患者的人口统计学和医学风险因素;(b) 确定患者接受的治疗方法;(c) 评估随访的充分性以及长期听力康复的依从性。
回顾性分析1998年1月至2017年12月在一家三级医疗学术中心就诊的单侧ISSNHL患者。
204例患者符合纳入标准。其中,129例(63.2%)在我们评估前未在外部医院接受治疗。在这个亚组中,治疗前平均纯音平均听阈(PTA)为61.9±2.5dB(分贝)。最常见的治疗方法是口服类固醇,76例患者(59.9%)接受了该治疗。患者还接受了鼓室内(IT)类固醇注射(7.2%)或口服类固醇后进行挽救性IT注射(19.4%)。平均随访时间为17.9(±29.2)个月,治疗后PTA(45.6±2.6dB)明显优于基线(<.001)。在这个队列中,很少推荐使用听力放大装置。不到20%的患者在最近一次就诊时报告积极使用听力放大装置。随访时,90例患者(69.8%)报告治疗后听力有主观改善。与治疗前听力图相比,只有55例患者(42.6%)的PTA有所改善。
许多ISSNHL患者治疗后听力有改善,但大多数仍有持续性听力损失。随访时间较短。大多数患者未使用长期听力放大装置。未来需要开展研究,以确定导致ISSNHL患者随访减少和听力放大装置使用依从性低的因素。
2c。