Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Internal Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan-Feb;26(1):32-38. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_165_19.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and Helicobacter pylori screening are routine parts of the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing bariatric surgery at many centers around the world. The reason for this step is to identify abnormalities that may change the surgical approach. In this study, we aim to evaluate the extent to which endoscopic findings and H. pylori testing affect the plan of care in bariatric patients.
We retrospectively reviewed the investigational processes of 356 patients planned for bariatric surgery (2014-2016) at our center. Patients were categorized into two main groups (4 subgroups) from endoscopic findings. One group included patients with normal EGD and patients who had abnormal findings that did not change the surgical approach, whereas the other included patients who had findings that changed or canceled the surgical plan. A logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate how strongly can factors such as patient demographics, BMI, comorbidities, symptomatology, and H. pylori status predict the risk of having plan-changing endoscopic abnormalities.
The ages ranged between 15 and 66 years with a mean ± SD of 37 ± 11 years, and 56% were females. The majority of patients (75%; 95% CI: 73 - 82%) had either no findings (41%) or had abnormalities that did not change the surgical approach (34%). Only 25% (95% CI: 21-29%) were found to have pathologies that altered the surgical approach, and 0.6% of them had findings that were considered contraindications for surgery. In spite the relatively high prevalence of H. pylori in our cohort (41%; 95% CI 36-46%), the proportion of patients who had plan-changing abnormalities did not differ markedly from other studies. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and obstructive sleep apnea symptoms were the only significant predictors of EGD findings (P = 0.009).
GERD and sleep apnea symptoms can be strong predictors of EGD abnormalities. However, this evidence is still not enough to safely recommend changing the current practice. Therefore, until a sensitive clinical prediction score is derived and validated according to the symptoms, we suggest that EGD should continue as the standard of care in all patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
背景/目的:在世界上许多中心,食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)和幽门螺杆菌筛查是肥胖症手术患者术前评估的常规部分。这样做的原因是为了确定可能改变手术方式的异常情况。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估内镜检查结果和幽门螺杆菌检测对肥胖症患者治疗计划的影响程度。
我们回顾性分析了我们中心 356 例计划接受减肥手术(2014-2016 年)患者的检查过程。根据内镜检查结果,患者分为两组(4 个亚组)。一组包括 EGD 正常的患者和异常但不改变手术方式的患者,另一组包括内镜检查结果改变或取消手术计划的患者。使用逻辑回归分析评估患者人口统计学特征、BMI、合并症、症状和幽门螺杆菌状态等因素对出现改变治疗计划的内镜异常的风险的影响程度。
患者年龄为 15-66 岁,平均年龄±标准差为 37±11 岁,56%为女性。大多数患者(75%;95%CI:73-82%)无异常发现(41%)或异常但不改变手术方式(34%)。只有 25%(95%CI:21-29%)的患者发现有改变手术方式的病理改变,其中 0.6%的患者发现有手术禁忌证。尽管我们的队列中幽门螺杆菌的患病率较高(41%;95%CI:36-46%),但有改变治疗计划的异常发现的患者比例与其他研究没有明显差异。胃食管反流病(GERD)和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停症状是 EGD 发现的唯一显著预测因素(P=0.009)。
GERD 和睡眠呼吸暂停症状可能是 EGD 异常的强预测因素。然而,这一证据还不足以安全地推荐改变当前的做法。因此,在根据症状得出并验证敏感的临床预测评分之前,我们建议在所有接受减肥手术的患者中继续将 EGD 作为标准治疗。