American Institutes for Research, Washington, D.C.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Psychol Sci. 2020 Feb;31(2):193-201. doi: 10.1177/0956797619896270. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
One simple marshmallow test in preschool children predicts an array of important life outcomes, according to multiple studies spanning several decades. However, a recent conceptual replication casts doubt on these famous findings. We conducted an independent, preregistered secondary analysis to test whether previously observed longitudinal associations between preschool delay of gratification and adolescent outcomes would be conceptually replicated. Associations were significant for three of the five outcomes we tested using the analytic approach employed in the original studies of the marshmallow test. Relationships between delay of gratification and problem behavior held in bivariate, multivariate, and multilevel models; in contrast, no significant relationships between delay and problem behavior were found in the other recent replication, even though both studies used the same data set. These relationships were better explained by social support than by self-control, suggesting that the marshmallow test is predictive because it reflects aspects of a child's early environment that are important over the long term. This novel interpretation of the classic findings points to new directions for intervention.
根据多项跨越数十年的研究,一项简单的幼儿园儿童棉花糖测试可以预测一系列重要的生活结果。然而,最近的一项概念复制对这些著名的发现提出了质疑。我们进行了一项独立的、预先注册的二次分析,以测试在幼儿园时期延迟满足与青少年期结果之间是否存在先前观察到的纵向关联。使用棉花糖测试原始研究中采用的分析方法,我们对五个测试结果中的三个进行了测试,结果表明存在关联。在单变量、多变量和多层次模型中,延迟满足与问题行为之间存在关系;相比之下,在最近的另一次复制中,没有发现延迟满足与问题行为之间存在显著关系,尽管这两项研究使用了相同的数据集。社会支持比自我控制更能解释这些关系,这表明棉花糖测试具有预测性,因为它反映了孩子早期环境的一些方面,这些方面在长期内很重要。对经典发现的这种新解释为干预指明了新的方向。