Functional Proteomics Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Department of Agro-Food Science and Technology, University of Bologna, 40126 Cesena, Italy.
Biomolecules. 2020 Jan 18;10(1):157. doi: 10.3390/biom10010157.
The manufacturing processes of commercial probiotic strains may be affected in different ways in the attempt to optimize yield, costs, functionality, or stability, influencing gene expression, protein patterns, or metabolic output. Aim of this work is to compare different samples of a high concentration (450 billion bacteria) multispecies (8 strains) formulation produced at two different manufacturing sites, United States of America (US) and Italy (IT), by applying a combination of functional proteomics, metabolomics, and in vivo analyses. Several protein-profile differences were detected between IT- and US-made products, with , , and Bifidobacteria being the main affected probiotics/microorganisms. Performing proton nuclear magnetic spectroscopy (H-NMR), some discrepancies in amino acid, lactate, betaine and sucrose concentrations were also reported between the two products. Finally, we investigated the health-promoting and antiaging effects of both products in the model organism . The integration of omics platforms with in vivo analysis has emerged as a powerful tool to assess manufacturing procedures.
商业益生菌菌株的制造工艺可能会受到不同的影响,以优化产量、成本、功能或稳定性,从而影响基因表达、蛋白质模式或代谢产物。本工作的目的是通过应用功能蛋白质组学、代谢组学和体内分析相结合的方法,比较在美国(US)和意大利(IT)两个不同制造地点生产的高浓度(4500 亿个细菌)多菌种(8 株)配方的不同样品。在 IT 和美国制造的产品之间检测到了几种蛋白质图谱差异,双歧杆菌属、乳杆菌属和链球菌属是主要受影响的益生菌/微生物。通过质子核磁共振光谱(H-NMR)分析,还报告了两种产品之间氨基酸、乳酸盐、甜菜碱和蔗糖浓度的一些差异。最后,我们在模式生物中研究了两种产品的促进健康和抗衰老作用。将组学平台与体内分析相结合已成为评估制造工艺的有力工具。