Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Burden of Disease Epidemiology, Equity and Cost-Effectiveness Programme (BODE3), Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Environ Health Perspect. 2020 Jan;128(1):17007. doi: 10.1289/EHP5996. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
The global food system is driving both the climate crisis and the growing burden of noncommunicable disease. International research has highlighted the climate and health co-benefit opportunity inherent in widespread uptake of plant-based diets. Nevertheless, uncertainty remains as to what constitutes healthy and climate-friendly eating patterns in specific world regions.
Using New Zealand as a case study, this research investigates the extent to which potential contextual differences may affect the local applicability of international trends. It further examines the potential for demand-end avenues to support a transition toward a healthier, more climate-friendly food system in New Zealand.
A New Zealand-specific life-cycle assessment (LCA) database was developed by modifying cradle to point-of-sale reference emissions estimates according to the New Zealand context. This food emissions database, together with a New Zealand-specific multistate life-table model, was then used to estimate climate, health, and health system cost impacts associated with shifting current consumption to align with dietary scenarios that conform to the New Zealand dietary guidelines (NZDGs).
Whole plant foods, including vegetables, fruits, legumes, and whole grains were substantially less climate-polluting () than animal-based foods, particularly red and processed meats (). Shifting population-level consumption to align with the NZDGs would confer diet-related emissions savings of 4-42%, depending on the degree of dietary change and food waste minimization pursued. NZDG-abiding dietary scenarios, when modeled out over the lifetime of the current New Zealand population, would also confer large health gains (1.0-1.5 million quality-adjusted life-years) and health care system cost savings ().
Guideline-abiding dietary scenarios, particularly those that prioritize plant-based foods, have the potential to confer substantial climate and health gains. This research shows that major contextual differences specific to New Zealand's food system do not appear to cause notable deviation from global trends, reinforcing recent international research. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5996.
全球食品体系既推动了气候危机,也加重了非传染性疾病的负担。国际研究强调,广泛采用植物性饮食具有气候和健康的协同效益。然而,在特定世界区域,何种饮食模式既健康又有利于气候仍存在不确定性。
本文以新西兰为例,研究潜在的情境差异在多大程度上可能影响国际趋势在当地的适用性。本文还探讨了需求端途径在多大程度上支持新西兰向更健康、更有利于气候的食品体系转型的可能性。
根据新西兰的具体情况,对摇篮到销售点的参考排放估计进行了调整,从而开发了一个新西兰特有的生命周期评估(LCA)数据库。然后,使用这个食品排放数据库和一个新西兰特有的多状态生命表模型,来估计与将当前消费转向符合新西兰饮食指南(NZDGs)的饮食情景相关的气候、健康和卫生系统成本影响。
与动物源性食品相比,全植物食品(包括蔬菜、水果、豆类和全谷物)的温室气体排放要低得多(),特别是红肉和加工肉类()。根据饮食变化和食物浪费最小化的程度,将人口级别的消费转向符合 NZDGs 将带来 4-42%的饮食相关排放节约。在当前新西兰人口的生命周期内,符合 NZDG 的饮食情景还将带来巨大的健康收益(1.0-1.5 百万个质量调整生命年)和卫生保健系统成本节约()。
符合指南的饮食情景,特别是那些优先考虑植物性食品的情景,有可能带来巨大的气候和健康效益。本研究表明,新西兰食品体系特有的主要情境差异似乎不会导致与全球趋势明显偏离,这与最近的国际研究结果一致。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5996。