• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国按含糖量划分的含糖饮料销售量分布:对分级征税和税收收入的影响。

Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 2020 Jun;41(2):125-138. doi: 10.1057/s41271-019-00217-x.

DOI:10.1057/s41271-019-00217-x
PMID:31969656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7228983/
Abstract

This study draws on data on sales volume, brand-level market shares, and sugar content to calculate the distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) sales volume by sugar content, propose sugar content thresholds for a tiered tax structure, and estimate tax revenue. The most common SSBs sold had 26 g of sugar/8-oz serving; 70.8% had ≥ 25 g of sugar/8-oz serving, 16.9% were in the 10-15 g range, and 8.7% were in the 16-20 g range. A tiered tax with cut points at < 20 g and < 5 g of sugar/8-oz serving is proposed. A tax of 1¢/oz for SSBs in the second tier and 2¢/oz in third tier is projected to raise $18.2 billion in tax revenue similar to the 1.5¢/oz flat tax projection ($18.0 billion) but would yield 9% lower SSB volume. Understanding the distribution of SSB sales volume by sugar content informs policymakers on tiered tax structures, which may discourage consumption of SSBs with high levels of sugar and incentivize reformulation.

摘要

本研究利用销售量、品牌市场份额和含糖量数据,计算了含糖量的含糖饮料(SSB)销售量分布,提出了分层税收结构的含糖量阈值,并估计了税收收入。销售的最常见 SSB 每 8 盎司含有 26 克糖;70.8%的 SSB 每 8 盎司含糖量≥25 克,16.9%的 SSB 含糖量在 10-15 克之间,8.7%的 SSB 含糖量在 16-20 克之间。建议采用分层税,起征点为<20 克和<5 克糖/8 盎司。预计对含糖量为 2 美分/盎司的 SSB 征收 1 美分/盎司的税,对含糖量为 3 美分/盎司的 SSB 征收 2 美分/盎司的税,可带来 182 亿美元的税收收入,与 1.5 美分/盎司的平税预测(180 亿美元)相似,但 SSB 销量将降低 9%。了解 SSB 销售量的含糖量分布可为政策制定者提供分层税收结构的信息,这可能会抑制高糖 SSB 的消费,并鼓励配方改革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae0/7228983/ef4baa9ea15a/41271_2019_217_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae0/7228983/57d69153c4e8/41271_2019_217_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae0/7228983/ef4baa9ea15a/41271_2019_217_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae0/7228983/57d69153c4e8/41271_2019_217_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae0/7228983/ef4baa9ea15a/41271_2019_217_Fig2a_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue.美国按含糖量划分的含糖饮料销售量分布:对分级征税和税收收入的影响。
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Jun;41(2):125-138. doi: 10.1057/s41271-019-00217-x.
2
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
3
Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.甜味饮料税与费城独立商店饮料和高糖食品购买量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113527. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13527.
4
Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Volume, Tiered, and Absolute Sugar Content Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policies in the United States: A Microsimulation Study.美国基于容积、分级和绝对含糖量的含糖饮料税收政策对健康的影响和成本效益:一项微观模拟研究。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):523-534. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042956. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
5
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
6
Projected health and economic impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Germany: A cross-validation modelling study.德国含糖饮料征税对健康和经济的预估影响:交叉验证模型研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Nov 21;20(11):e1004311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004311. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Projected impact of the Portuguese sugar-sweetened beverage tax on obesity incidence across different age groups: A modelling study.葡萄牙含糖饮料税对不同年龄组肥胖发病率的预计影响:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 12;17(3):e1003036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003036. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
The impact of Seattle's Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices and volume sold.西雅图含糖饮料税对饮料价格和销售量的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100856. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
9
Evaluation of Changes in Grams of Sugar Sold After the Implementation of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax.评估西雅图含糖饮料税实施后糖销售量的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32271.
10
Oakland's sugar-sweetened beverage tax: Impacts on prices, purchases and consumption by adults and children.奥克兰市的含糖饮料税:对成年人及儿童的价格、购买量和消费量的影响
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100865. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100865. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of the Sweetened Beverages Tax on Their Reformulation in Poland-The Analysis of the Composition of Commercially Available Beverages before and after the Introduction of the Tax (2020 vs. 2021).甜味饮料税对波兰饮料配方改革的影响——税收实施前后(2020 年与 2021 年)市售饮料成分分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;19(21):14464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114464.
2
Life's Essential 8: Updating and Enhancing the American Heart Association's Construct of Cardiovascular Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association.《生命的基础 8:更新和强化美国心脏协会心血管健康构建:美国心脏协会主席特别咨询报告》。
Circulation. 2022 Aug 2;146(5):e18-e43. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001078. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
2
The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children.费城饮料税对成年人和儿童购买和消费的影响。
J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;67:102225. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102225. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
3
Sugar-based beverage taxes and beverage prices: Evidence from South Africa's Health Promotion Levy.
Evaluation of Changes in Grams of Sugar Sold After the Implementation of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax.评估西雅图含糖饮料税实施后糖销售量的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32271.
4
Using nutritional survey data to inform the design of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in low-resource contexts: a cross-sectional analysis based on data from an adult Caribbean population.利用营养调查数据为资源匮乏环境下含糖饮料征税提供信息:基于加勒比成年人数据的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e035981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035981.
5
Simple Is Better for Local Beverage Tax Policy Diffusion.简单化更有利于地方饮料税政策的传播。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):535-537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048336. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
含糖饮料税和饮料价格:来自南非健康促进税的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112465. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112465. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
The Economics of Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Review of the Effects on Prices, Sales, Cross-Border Shopping, and Consumption.含糖饮料征税的经济学分析:对价格、销售、跨境购物和消费影响的综述。
Annu Rev Nutr. 2019 Aug 21;39:317-338. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-082018-124603. Epub 2019 May 22.
5
Assessing the impact of the Barbados sugar-sweetened beverage tax on beverage sales: an observational study.评估巴巴多斯含糖饮料税对饮料销售的影响:一项观察性研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 30;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0776-7.
6
Evaluating the 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Chile: An observational study in urban areas.评估智利 2014 年含糖饮料税:城市地区的观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002596. eCollection 2018 Jul.
7
Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.智利 2014 年含糖饮料税与含糖饮料价格和购买量的变化:城市环境下的观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002597. eCollection 2018 Jul.
8
The Short-Term Impacts of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Consumption.费城饮料税对饮料消费的短期影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
9
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
10
In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.在墨西哥,实施含糖饮料税后两年消费者持续反应的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):564-571. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231. Epub 2017 Feb 22.