Suppr超能文献

烹饪燃料与中国城市全因和心肺疾病死亡率的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Cooking fuels and risk of all-cause and cardiopulmonary mortality in urban China: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health (Incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Mar;8(3):e430-e439. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30525-X. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cooking practice has transitioned from use of solid fuels to use of clean fuels, with addition of better ventilation facilities. However, the change in mortality risk associated with such a transition remains unclear.

METHODS

The China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) Study enrolled participants (aged 30-79 years) from ten areas across China; we chose to study participants from five urban areas where transition from use of solid fuels to clean fuels for cooking was prevalent. Participants who reported regular cooking (weekly or more frequently) at baseline were categorised as persistent clean fuel users, previous solid fuel users, or persistent solid fuel users, according to self-reported fuel use histories. All-cause and cardiopulmonary mortality were identified through linkage to China's Disease Surveillance Point system and local mortality records.

FINDINGS

Between June 24, 2004, and July 15, 2008, 226 186 participants living in five urban areas of China were enrolled in the CKB Study. Among 171 677 participants who reported cooking regularly (weekly or more frequently), 75 785 (44%) were persistent clean fuel users, 80 511 (47%) were previous solid fuel users, and 15 381 (9%) were persistent solid fuel users. During a mean of 9·8 (SD 1·7) years of follow-up, 10 831 deaths were documented, including 3819 cardiovascular deaths and 761 respiratory deaths. Compared with persistent clean fuel users, persistent solid fuel users had significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1·19, 95% CI 1·10-1·28), cardiovascular mortality (1·24, 1·10-1·39), and respiratory mortality (1·43, 1·10-1·85). The excess risk of all-cause and cardiopulmonary mortality fell by more than 60% in 5 years after cessation of solid fuel use and continued to decrease afterwards. Use of ventilation was associated with lower all-cause mortality risk, even among persistent clean fuel users (HR 0·78, 0·69-0·89).

INTERPRETATION

Solid fuel use for cooking is associated with a higher risk of mortality, and cessation of solid fuel use cuts excess mortality risks swiftly and substantially within 5 years. Ventilation use also lowers the risk of mortality, even among people who persistently use clean fuels. It is of prime importance for both policy makers and the public to accelerate the transition from solid fuels to clean fuels and promote efficient ventilation to minimise further adverse health effects.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Wellcome Trust, and Kadoorie Charitable Foundation.

摘要

背景

烹饪实践已经从使用固体燃料转变为使用清洁燃料,并增加了更好的通风设施。然而,这种转变与死亡率风险之间的关联仍不清楚。

方法

中国慢性病前瞻性研究(CKB)从中国十个地区招募参与者(年龄 30-79 岁);我们选择研究来自五个城市地区的参与者,这些地区普遍从使用固体燃料向清洁燃料过渡。根据自我报告的燃料使用历史,基线时报告定期(每周或更频繁)烹饪的参与者被归类为持续使用清洁燃料者、以前使用固体燃料者或持续使用固体燃料者。全因和心肺死亡率通过与中国疾病监测点系统和当地死亡率记录的关联来确定。

发现

2004 年 6 月 24 日至 2008 年 7 月 15 日,在中国五个城市地区居住的 226186 名参与者参加了 CKB 研究。在 171677 名报告定期(每周或更频繁)烹饪的 171677 名参与者中,75785 名(44%)为持续使用清洁燃料者,80511 名(47%)为以前使用固体燃料者,15381 名(9%)为持续使用固体燃料者。在平均 9.8(SD 1.7)年的随访期间,记录了 10831 例死亡,包括 3819 例心血管死亡和 761 例呼吸死亡。与持续使用清洁燃料者相比,持续使用固体燃料者的全因死亡率(风险比[HR]1.19,95%CI 1.10-1.28)、心血管死亡率(1.24,1.10-1.39)和呼吸死亡率(1.43,1.10-1.85)均显著升高。停止使用固体燃料后 5 年内,全因和心肺死亡的超额风险降低了 60%以上,此后继续下降。即使在持续使用清洁燃料的人群中,使用通风也与较低的全因死亡率风险相关(HR 0.78,0.69-0.89)。

解释

烹饪用固体燃料与死亡率风险升高相关,停止使用固体燃料可在 5 年内迅速大幅降低超额死亡率风险。通风的使用也降低了死亡率风险,即使在持续使用清洁燃料的人群中也是如此。对于政策制定者和公众来说,最重要的是加快从固体燃料向清洁燃料的过渡,并促进有效的通风,以尽量减少进一步的不良健康影响。

资助

国家自然科学基金委员会、惠康信托基金会和凯度慈善基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c4f/7031698/f7bcb55b32a8/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验