International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.
Nature-based Solutions Initiative, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 16;375(1794):20190127. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0127. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
As the severity of the triple challenges of global inequality, climate change and biodiversity loss becomes clearer, governments and international development institutions must find effective policy instruments to respond. We examine the potential of social assistance policies in this context. Social assistance refers to transfers to poor, vulnerable and marginalized groups to reduce their vulnerability and livelihood risks, and to enhance their rights and status. Substantial public funds support social assistance programmes globally. Collectively, lower- and middle-income countries spend approximately 1.5% of their GDP on social assistance annually. We focus on the potential of paid employment schemes to promote effective ecosystem stewardship. Available evidence suggests such programmes can offer multiple benefits in terms of improvements in local ecosystems and natural capital, carbon sequestration and local biodiversity conservation. We review evidence from three key case studies: in India (the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme), Ethiopia (the Productive Safety Nets Programme) and Mexico (the Temporary Employment Programme). We conclude that, to realize the potential of employment-based social assistance for ecosystem benefits it will be necessary to address two challenges: first, the weak design and maintenance of local public works outputs in many schemes, and second, the concern that social protection schemes may become less effective if they are overburdened with additional objectives. Overcoming these challenges requires an evolution of institutional systems for delivering social assistance to enable a more effective combination of social and environmental objectives. This article is part of the theme issue 'Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions'.
随着全球不平等、气候变化和生物多样性丧失这三重挑战的严重性变得更加明显,政府和国际发展机构必须找到有效的政策手段来应对。我们在此背景下探讨了社会援助政策的潜力。社会援助是指向贫困、脆弱和边缘化群体转移资金,以降低其脆弱性和生计风险,并增强其权利和地位。大量公共资金支持全球的社会援助计划。总体而言,中低收入国家每年将其国内生产总值的 1.5%左右用于社会援助。我们专注于有偿就业计划在促进有效的生态系统管理方面的潜力。现有证据表明,此类计划在改善当地生态系统和自然资本、碳固存和当地生物多样性保护方面可以带来多种好处。我们审查了来自三个关键案例研究的证据:印度(圣雄甘地全国农村就业保障计划)、埃塞俄比亚(生产性安全网计划)和墨西哥(临时就业计划)。我们的结论是,为了实现就业型社会援助在生态系统效益方面的潜力,需要应对两个挑战:首先,许多计划中本地公共工程产出的设计和维护薄弱;其次,人们担心如果社会保护计划承担过多的额外目标,它们的有效性可能会降低。克服这些挑战需要对提供社会援助的制度系统进行演变,以实现社会和环境目标的更有效结合。本文是“气候变化与生态系统:威胁、机遇与解决方案”主题专辑的一部分。