Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Centre for Clinical Research, Sörmland County Council, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Jun;19(5):421-432. doi: 10.1177/1474515120902317. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
Patients' self-care behaviour is still suboptimal in many heart failure (HF) patients and underlying mechanisms on how to improve self-care need to be studied.
(1) To describe the trajectory of patients' self-care behaviour over 1 year, (2) to clarify the relationship between the trajectory of self-care and clinical outcomes, and (3) to identify factors related to changes in self-care behaviour.
In this secondary analysis of the COACH-2 study, 167 HF patients (mean age 73 years) were included. Self-care behaviour was assessed at baseline and after 12 months using the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale. The threshold score of ⩾70 was used to define good self-care behaviour.
Of all patients, 21% had persistent poor self-care behaviour, and 27% decreased from good to poor. Self-care improved from poor to good in 10%; 41% had a good self-care during both measurements. Patients who improved self-care had significantly higher perceived control than those with persistently good self-care at baseline. Patients who decreased their self-care had more all-cause hospitalisations (35%) and cardiovascular hospitalisations (26%) than patients with persistently good self-care (2.9%, < 0.05). The prevalence of depression increased at 12 months in both patients having persistent poor self-care (0% to 21%) and decreasing self-care (4.4% to 22%, both < 0.05).
Perceived control is a positive factor to improve self-care, and a decrease in self-care is related to worse outcomes. Interventions to reduce psychological distress combined with self-care support could have a beneficial impact on patients decreasing or persistently poor self-care behaviour.
许多心力衰竭(HF)患者的自我护理行为仍然不理想,需要研究如何改善自我护理的潜在机制。
(1)描述患者自我护理行为在 1 年内的变化轨迹,(2)阐明自我护理轨迹与临床结局之间的关系,以及(3)确定与自我护理行为变化相关的因素。
在 COACH-2 研究的二次分析中,纳入了 167 名 HF 患者(平均年龄 73 岁)。使用欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表在基线和 12 个月时评估自我护理行为。使用 ⩾70 分的阈值分数来定义良好的自我护理行为。
所有患者中,21%的患者持续存在较差的自我护理行为,27%的患者自我护理行为从良好下降到较差。10%的患者自我护理行为从较差改善为良好;41%的患者在两次测量中都有良好的自我护理行为。自我护理行为改善的患者在基线时比持续良好自我护理的患者有更高的感知控制。自我护理行为下降的患者因全因住院(35%)和心血管住院(26%)的次数明显高于持续良好自我护理的患者(2.9%,<0.05)。在持续较差自我护理的患者(从 0%增加到 21%)和自我护理下降的患者(从 4.4%增加到 22%,均<0.05)中,12 个月时抑郁的患病率均增加。
感知控制是改善自我护理的积极因素,自我护理的下降与较差的结局有关。减少心理困扰的干预措施与自我护理支持相结合,可能对自我护理行为下降或持续较差的患者产生有益影响。