Suppr超能文献

从中年到晚年的胰岛素抵抗与晚年主动脉僵硬的关联:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究。

Association of insulin resistance, from mid-life to late-life, with aortic stiffness in late-life: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, USA.

, 1620 Tremont Street, OBC 3-34, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Jan 28;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-0986-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance may contribute to aortic stiffening that leads to end-organ damage. We examined the cross-sectional association and prospective association of insulin resistance and aortic stiffness in older adults without diabetes.

METHODS

We analyzed 2571 men and women at Visit 5 (in 2011-2013), and 2350 men and women at repeat examinations from baseline at Visit 1 (in 1987-1989) to Visit 5 (in 2011-2013). Linear regression was used to estimate the difference in aortic stiffness per standard unit of HOMA-IR, TG/HDL-C, and TyG at Visit 5. Linear mixed effects were used to assess if high, as opposed to non-high, aortic stiffness (> 75th percentile) was preceded by a faster annual rate of change in log-HOMA-IR, log-TG/HDL-C, and log-TyG from Visit 1 to Visit 5.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 75 years, 37% (n = 957) were men, and 17% (n = 433) were African American. At Visit 5, higher HOMA-IR, higher TG/HDL-C, and higher TyG were associated with higher aortic stiffness (16 cm/s per SD (95% CI 6, 27), 29 cm/s per SD (95% CI 18, 40), and 32 cm/s per SD (95% CI 22, 42), respectively). From Visit 1 to Visit 5, high aortic stiffness, compared to non-high aortic stiffness, was not preceded by a faster annual rate of change in log-HOMA-IR from baseline to 9 years (0.030 (95% CI 0.024, 0.035) vs. 0.025 (95% CI 0.021, 0.028); p = 0.15) or 9 years onward (0.011 (95% CI 0.007, 0.015) vs. 0.011 (95% CI 0.009, 0.013); p = 0.31); in log-TG/HDL-C from baseline to 9 years (0.019 (95% CI 0.015, 0.024) vs. 0.024 (95% CI 0.022, 0.026); p = 0.06) or 9 years onward (- 0.007 (95% CI - 0.010, - 0.005) vs. - 0.009 (95% CI - 0.010, - 0.007); p = 0.08); or in log-TyG from baseline to 9 years (0.002 (95% CI 0.002, 0.003) vs. 0.003 (95% CI 0.003, 0.003); p = 0.03) or 9 years onward (0 (95% CI 0, 0) vs. 0 (95% CI 0, 0); p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults without diabetes, insulin resistance was associated with aortic stiffness, but the putative role of insulin resistance in aortic stiffness over the life course requires further study.

摘要

背景

胰岛素抵抗可能导致主动脉僵硬,进而导致靶器官损伤。我们研究了无糖尿病的老年人中胰岛素抵抗与主动脉僵硬的横断面关联和前瞻性关联。

方法

我们分析了 2571 名男性和女性在第 5 次就诊(2011-2013 年)时的数据,以及 2350 名男性和女性在基线第 1 次就诊(1987-1989 年)到第 5 次就诊(2011-2013 年)的重复就诊时的数据。线性回归用于估计第 5 次就诊时 HOMA-IR、TG/HDL-C 和 TyG 的每标准单位的主动脉僵硬差异。线性混合效应用于评估高 HOMA-IR、高 TG/HDL-C 和高 TyG 是否比非高 HOMA-IR、非高 TG/HDL-C 和非高 TyG 具有更快的年度变化率,从第 1 次就诊到第 5 次就诊时的 log-HOMA-IR、log-TG/HDL-C 和 log-TyG。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为 75 岁,37%(n=957)为男性,17%(n=433)为非裔美国人。在第 5 次就诊时,较高的 HOMA-IR、较高的 TG/HDL-C 和较高的 TyG 与较高的主动脉僵硬相关(16cm/s/SD(95%CI 6,27)、29cm/s/SD(95%CI 18,40)和 32cm/s/SD(95%CI 22,42),分别)。从第 1 次就诊到第 5 次就诊,与非高主动脉僵硬相比,高主动脉僵硬并没有导致从基线到 9 年的 log-HOMA-IR 年度变化率更快(0.030(95%CI 0.024,0.035)比 0.025(95%CI 0.021,0.028);p=0.15)或 9 年以后更快(0.011(95%CI 0.007,0.015)比 0.011(95%CI 0.009,0.013);p=0.31);从基线到 9 年的 log-TG/HDL-C 年度变化率更快(0.019(95%CI 0.015,0.024)比 0.024(95%CI 0.022,0.026);p=0.06)或 9 年以后更快(-0.007(95%CI -0.010,-0.005)比-0.009(95%CI -0.010,-0.007);p=0.08);或从基线到 9 年的 log-TyG 年度变化率更快(0.002(95%CI 0.002,0.003)比 0.003(95%CI 0.003,0.003);p=0.03)或 9 年以后更快(0(95%CI 0,0)比 0(95%CI 0,0);p=0.08)。

结论

在无糖尿病的老年人中,胰岛素抵抗与主动脉僵硬相关,但胰岛素抵抗在主动脉僵硬的整个生命过程中的作用尚需进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa49/6986071/93e3219bae33/12933_2020_986_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验