Green Sharon H, Wang Charlotte, Ballakrishnen Swethaa S, Brueckner Hannah, Bearman Peter
Dept of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States.
INCITE, Columbia University, 3078 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, United States.
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jan 31;9:100370. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100370. eCollection 2019 Dec.
The consequences for women "left behind" by virtue of temporary male migration are mixed. On the one hand, concomitant changes in fertility, participation in the labor force, and social norms are often associated with increased independence for women. On the other hand, women left behind can be vulnerable to increased dependency on members of their husbands' family or face limited access to social institutions. These shifts in women's capacity for decision making can have important implications for their health and well-being. Focusing on the state of Kerala in southern India, we examine the conditions under which the remittances that migrants send home have an impact on the health of women left behind. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the timing of remittance sending can support women's autonomy and improve their ability to make autonomous healthcare decisions. We use evidence from migrant households in Kerala, a region deeply engrained in the world labor migration system for more than five decades. Analysis is conducted with data from the 2016 wave of the Kerala Migration Survey (KMS), a representative household survey, and paired with in-depth qualitative interviews with women in Kerala whose husbands and other family members have migrated to the Gulf. We show that the positive effect of remittances on women's autonomy manifests primarily through the timing of remittance receipt, not the amount of money remitted. Regular remittances are associated with higher levels of autonomy than remittances received at irregular intervals, net of amount remitted. This finding challenges the usual emphasis on remittance volume as the driving factor of social and behavioral change in sending communities. Analytical efforts should be refocused on the social-interactional component of remittance sending and how these interactions can impact women's health and autonomy.
因男性临时移民而“被留下”的女性所面临的后果好坏参半。一方面,生育、劳动力参与率和社会规范的相应变化往往与女性独立性的增强相关。另一方面,被留下的女性可能更容易依赖丈夫的家庭成员,或者面临获得社会机构服务的机会有限的问题。女性决策能力的这些变化会对她们的健康和福祉产生重要影响。以印度南部的喀拉拉邦为例,我们研究了移民寄回家的汇款在何种情况下会对被留下的女性的健康产生影响。具体而言,我们评估汇款时间能在多大程度上支持女性的自主权,并提高她们自主做出医疗保健决策的能力。我们使用了喀拉拉邦移民家庭的证据,该地区五十多年来一直深深融入世界劳动力移民体系。分析采用了2016年喀拉拉邦移民调查(KMS)的数据,这是一项具有代表性的家庭调查,并结合了对喀拉拉邦丈夫和其他家庭成员移民到海湾地区的女性进行的深入定性访谈。我们表明,汇款对女性自主权的积极影响主要通过汇款接收时间体现,而非汇款金额。扣除汇款金额后,定期汇款比不定期收到的汇款与更高水平的自主权相关。这一发现挑战了通常将汇款金额视为汇款社区社会和行为变化驱动因素的观点。分析工作应重新聚焦于汇款发送的社会互动因素以及这些互动如何影响女性的健康和自主权。