• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定国际通用的房颤患者结局测评标准集:国际卫生结局测量合作组织(ICHOM)房颤工作组报告。

Development of an international standard set of outcome measures for patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) atrial fibrillation working group.

机构信息

International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, Hamilton House, London WC1H 9BB, UK.

Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2020 Mar 7;41(10):1132-1140. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz871.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz871
PMID:31995195
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7060456/
Abstract

AIMS

As health systems around the world increasingly look to measure and improve the value of care that they provide to patients, being able to measure the outcomes that matter most to patients is vital. To support the shift towards value-based health care in atrial fibrillation (AF), the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled an international Working Group (WG) of 30 volunteers, including health professionals and patient representatives to develop a standardized minimum set of outcomes for benchmarking care delivery in clinical settings.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using an online-modified Delphi process, outcomes important to patients and health professionals were selected and categorized into (i) long-term consequences of disease outcomes, (ii) complications of treatment outcomes, and (iii) patient-reported outcomes. The WG identified demographic and clinical variables for use as case-mix risk adjusters. These included baseline demographics, comorbidities, cognitive function, date of diagnosis, disease duration, medications prescribed and AF procedures, as well as smoking, body mass index (BMI), alcohol intake, and physical activity. Where appropriate, and for ease of implementation, standardization of outcomes and case-mix variables was achieved using ICD codes. The standard set underwent an open review process in which over 80% of patients surveyed agreed with the outcomes captured by the standard set.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of these consensus recommendations could help institutions to monitor, compare and improve the quality and delivery of chronic AF care. Their consistent definition and collection, using ICD codes where applicable, could also broaden the implementation of more patient-centric clinical outcomes research in AF.

摘要

目的

随着全球各地的医疗系统越来越关注衡量和提高为患者提供的医疗服务价值,衡量对患者最重要的结果至关重要。为了支持在心房颤动(AF)中向基于价值的医疗保健转变,国际健康结果测量联合会(ICHOM)组织了一个由 30 名志愿者组成的国际工作组(WG),其中包括卫生专业人员和患者代表,以制定用于基准化临床环境中护理提供的标准化最小结果集。

方法和结果

使用在线修改后的 Delphi 流程,选择对患者和卫生专业人员重要的结果,并将其分为(i)疾病结果的长期后果,(ii)治疗结果的并发症,以及(iii)患者报告的结果。WG 确定了用于作为病例组合风险调整器的人口统计学和临床变量。这些变量包括基线人口统计学、合并症、认知功能、诊断日期、疾病持续时间、开处方的药物和 AF 程序,以及吸烟、体重指数(BMI)、酒精摄入量和身体活动。在适当的情况下,为了便于实施,使用 ICD 代码实现了结果和病例组合变量的标准化。该标准集经过公开审查过程,超过 80%的调查患者同意标准集中捕获的结果。

结论

实施这些共识建议可以帮助机构监测、比较和改进慢性 AF 护理的质量和提供。使用适用的 ICD 代码对其进行一致的定义和收集,也可以扩大更以患者为中心的 AF 临床结果研究的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105b/7060456/98f434ff4c1d/ehz871f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105b/7060456/98f434ff4c1d/ehz871f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105b/7060456/98f434ff4c1d/ehz871f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of an international standard set of outcome measures for patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) atrial fibrillation working group.制定国际通用的房颤患者结局测评标准集:国际卫生结局测量合作组织(ICHOM)房颤工作组报告。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Mar 7;41(10):1132-1140. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz871.
2
Which outcomes are most important to measure in patients with COVID-19 and how and when should these be measured? Development of an international standard set of outcomes measures for clinical use in patients with COVID-19: a report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) COVID-19 Working Group.对于 COVID-19 患者,哪些结果最重要,应该如何以及何时测量这些结果?制定用于 COVID-19 患者临床使用的国际标准结局测量集:国际卫生结局测量合作组织(ICHOM)COVID-19 工作组的报告。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 15;11(11):e051065. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051065.
3
Development of an International Standard Set of Value-Based Outcome Measures for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) CKD Working Group.开发一套基于价值的国际慢性肾脏病患者结局测量标准集:国际健康结局测量联盟(ICHOM)慢性肾脏病工作组的报告。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Mar;73(3):372-384. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
4
International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Set of Outcomes That Matter to People Living With Inflammatory Arthritis: Consensus From an International Working Group.国际健康结局测量联合会炎症性关节炎患者关心的结局指标集:国际工作组的共识。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Dec;71(12):1556-1565. doi: 10.1002/acr.23799.
5
Development of an international standard set of clinical and patient-reported outcomes for children and adults with congenital heart disease: a report from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Congenital Heart Disease Working Group.先天性心脏病儿童和成人临床及患者报告结局国际标准集的制定:国际健康结局测量联盟先天性心脏病工作组报告
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Jul 21;7(4):354-365. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab009.
6
A Standard Set for Outcome Measurement in Patients With Hand and Wrist Conditions: Consensus by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hand and Wrist Working Group.手部和腕部疾病患者结局测量的标准集:国际健康结局测量联合会手部和腕部工作组的共识。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Oct;46(10):841-855.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
7
A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative.基于价值的乳腺癌患者为中心的结局标准集:国际健康结果测量联合会(ICHOM)倡议。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):677-685. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851.
8
Standard set of patient-reported outcomes for personality disorder.人格障碍患者报告结局的标准成套量表。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Dec;30(12):3485-3500. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02870-w. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
9
An International Collaborative Standardizing Patient-Centered Outcome Measures in Pediatric Facial Palsy.国际协作标准化小儿面神经麻痹患者中心结局测量。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Sep 1;21(5):351-358. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0224.
10
An International Collaborative Standardizing a Comprehensive Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Colorectal Cancer.国际协作标准化全面以患者为中心的结直肠癌结局测量集。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):686-694. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0417.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a core patient-centred outcome set for adults living with obesity: a modified delphi-based international consensus.肥胖成人核心以患者为中心的结局集的制定:基于改良德尔菲法的国际共识
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 20;87:103422. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103422. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Neurocognitive and Psychosocial Interactions in Atrial Fibrillation: Toward a Holistic Model of Care.心房颤动中的神经认知与心理社会相互作用:迈向整体护理模式
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;13(15):1863. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151863.
3
Digital monitoring and electronic patient-reported outcomes collection following atrial fibrillation ablation.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical characteristics of heart failure patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation today in Europe. Data from the atrial fibrillation registries of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Heart Rhythm Association.当今欧洲接受心房颤动消融术的心力衰竭患者的临床特征。来自欧洲心脏病学会和欧洲心律协会心房颤动注册研究的数据。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 May;21(5):690-693. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1458. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Medical Therapy on Quality of Life Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial.导管消融与药物治疗对心房颤动患者生活质量的影响:CABANA 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1275-1285. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0692.
3
心房颤动消融术后的数字监测与电子患者报告结局收集
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Apr 21;6(7):969-977. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.04.004. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Effect of Frailty on Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.衰弱对心血管临床试验的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun 23;4(7):101889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101889.
5
A landscape review to identify what matters to patients with thrombotic cardiovascular diseases and patient-reported outcome instruments which can be used to capture the patient experience.一项全景综述,旨在确定对血栓性心血管疾病患者重要的事项以及可用于获取患者体验的患者报告结局工具。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03790-1. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
6
Definitions of clinical study outcome measures for cardiovascular diseases: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials (EuroHeart).心血管疾病临床研究结局指标的定义:欧洲心脏护理评估与随机试验统一注册系统(EuroHeart)
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jan 7;46(2):190-214. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae724.
7
Cardiac prehabilitation, rehabilitation and education in first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation (CREED AF): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.首次心房颤动 (AF) 消融时的心脏康复、康复和教育 (CREED AF):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0310951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310951. eCollection 2024.
8
Association between personality type and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with atrial fibrillation.人格类型与心房颤动患者报告结局(PRO)的相关性。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Aug 22;24(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04098-1.
9
Challenging the status quo: a scoping review of value-based care models in cardiology and electrophysiology.挑战现状:心脏学和电生理学中基于价值的护理模式的范围综述。
Europace. 2024 Aug 30;26(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae210.
10
Measurement properties of utility-based health-related quality of life measures in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs: a systematic review.基于效用的健康相关生活质量测量在心脏康复和二级预防计划中的测量特性:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Sep;33(9):2299-2320. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03657-5. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会与胸外科医师协会合作报告
Circulation. 2019 Jul 9;140(2):e125-e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
Harmonized outcome measures for use in atrial fibrillation patient registries and clinical practice: Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society Board of Trustees.心房颤动患者登记处和临床实践中使用的协调结局指标:得到心律学会理事会的认可。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Jan;16(1):e3-e16. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
5
Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、地区和国家残疾调整生命年(DALYs)359 种疾病和伤害以及 195 个国家和地区 1990-2017 年的健康期望寿命(HALE):2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1859-1922. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3.
6
2018 Focused Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.2018 年加拿大心血管学会心房颤动管理指南重点更新。
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;34(11):1371-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.08.026.
7
Modifiable Risk Factors and Atrial Fibrillation.可改变的风险因素与心房颤动。
Circulation. 2017 Aug 8;136(6):583-596. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023163.
8
Integrated care in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心房颤动的综合治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Heart. 2017 Dec;103(24):1947-1953. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310952. Epub 2017 May 10.
9
An International Collaborative Standardizing a Comprehensive Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Colorectal Cancer.国际协作标准化全面以患者为中心的结直肠癌结局测量集。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):686-694. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0417.
10
A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative.基于价值的乳腺癌患者为中心的结局标准集:国际健康结果测量联合会(ICHOM)倡议。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):677-685. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851.