Cancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.
School of Medicine, University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.
Epigenetics. 2020 Jun-Jul;15(6-7):715-727. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2020.1712876. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Liquid biopsies offer significant potential for informing on cancer progression and therapeutic resistance via minimally invasive serial monitoring of genetic alterations. Although the cancer epigenome is a central driving force in most neoplasia, the accuracy of monitoring the tumor methylome using liquid biopsies remains relatively unknown.
to investigate how well two types of liquid biopsy (urine and blood) capture the prostate cancer methylome, and may thus serve as a non-invasive surrogate for studying the tumor epigenome.
A cohort of four metastatic treatment naïve prostate cancer (PCa) patients was selected. Matched biopsy cores (tumor and histologically matched-normal), post-DRE, pre-biopsy urine, and peripheral blood plasma were available for each subject. DNA methylation was profiled utilizing the Infinium® MethylationEPIC BeadChip (Illumina) and analysed using the RnBeads software. Significantly (FDR adjusted < 0.05) differentially methylated probes (DMPs) between tumor and MN were identified and examined in the liquids (done at a grouped and individual subject level).
DNA methylation analysis of urine and blood in men with metastatic PCa showed highly correlated patterns between the different liquid types (ρ = 0.93, < 0.0001), with large contributions from non-tumor sources. DNA methylation profiles of liquids were more similar between subjects, than intra-individual liquid-tumor correlations. Overall, both urine and plasma are viable surrogates for tumor tissue biopsies, capturing up to 39.40% and 64.14% of tumor-specific methylation alterations, respectively.
We conclude that both urine and blood plasma are easily accessible and sensitive biofluids for the study of PCa epigenomic alterations.
液体活检通过对遗传改变进行微创的连续监测,为了解癌症进展和治疗耐药性提供了巨大的潜力。尽管癌症表观基因组是大多数肿瘤的主要驱动因素,但通过液体活检监测肿瘤甲基组的准确性尚不清楚。
研究两种类型的液体活检(尿液和血液)对前列腺癌甲基组的捕获能力,以及是否可以作为研究肿瘤表观基因组的非侵入性替代方法。
选择了 4 名转移性治疗初治前列腺癌(PCa)患者的队列。每个患者都有匹配的活检标本(肿瘤和组织学匹配的正常组织)、DRE 后、活检前尿液和外周血血浆。利用 Infinium® MethylationEPIC BeadChip(Illumina)进行 DNA 甲基化谱分析,并使用 RnBeads 软件进行分析。在液体中(在分组和个体水平上进行)鉴定出肿瘤和 MN 之间具有显著差异(FDR 调整<0.05)的甲基化探针(DMPs)并进行了检查。
在患有转移性 PCa 的男性的尿液和血液 DNA 甲基化分析中,不同液体类型之间的模式高度相关(ρ=0.93,<0.0001),并且来自非肿瘤来源的贡献很大。液体之间的 DNA 甲基化谱在个体之间更为相似,而个体内液体与肿瘤的相关性则不然。总体而言,尿液和血浆都是可行的肿瘤组织活检替代品,分别可捕获多达 39.40%和 64.14%的肿瘤特异性甲基化改变。
我们得出结论,尿液和血浆都是易于获取且敏感的生物液体,可用于研究 PCa 表观基因组改变。