Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.
Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Department of Nutrition, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2021 Jun;91(3-4):242-250. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000623. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
The aim of present study was to compare, and determine, the effects of a modified alternate-day fasting diet vs. calorie restriction on inflammatory indices and coagulation factors. This was a randomized clinical trial consisting of 80 metabolic syndrome patients, who were enrolled and randomly dichotomized into a modified alternate-day fasting diet or calorie restriction group for 4 months. We measured weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumstance (WC), waist-hip-ratio (WHR) and fat mass as primary outcomes and assessed high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and coagulation factors levels as secondary outcomes before and after intervention. Compared to the calorie restriction diet, following a modified alternate-day fasting diet led to a greater reduction in body weight (kg) (-6.43 ± 4.34 vs -4.11 ± 4.27; P = 0.02), BMI (kg/m) (-3.19 ± 2.90 vs -1.43 ± 2.72; P = 0.01), fat mass (kg) (-4.88 ± 2.09 vs -3.72 ± 2.43; P = 0.03), WC (cm) (-5.57 ± 5.64 vs -2.32 ± 5.95; P = 0.01) and WHR (-0.05 ± 0.06 vs -0.02 ± 0.07; P = 0.04). Furthermore, a greater change was found in hs-CRP levels (mg/L) (-2.06 ± 1.18 vs -0.97 ± 0.82; P = 0.03), prothrombin time (s) (1.41 ± 2.34 vs -0.41 ± 2.17; P < 0.001), activated partial thromboplastin time (s) (0.26 ± 3.70 vs -1.78 ± 3.56; P = 0.04) in modified alternate-day fasting diet when compared to calorie restriction diet. However, there was no difference in TNF-α or IL-6 and fibrinogen between groups (P > 0.05). These findings suggest that a modified alternate-day fasting diet can be a beneficial alternative for the management of body weight, fat mass and WC as well as hs-CRP and coagulation factors levels among metabolic syndrome patients.
本研究旨在比较隔日禁食饮食与热量限制对炎症指标和凝血因子的影响,并确定其影响。这是一项随机临床试验,共纳入 80 例代谢综合征患者,将其随机分为隔日禁食饮食组或热量限制组,进行 4 个月的干预。我们测量了体重、体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)、腰臀比(WHR)和脂肪量作为主要结局,并评估了高敏 C 反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素 6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和凝血因子水平作为次要结局,分别在干预前后进行评估。与热量限制饮食相比,隔日禁食饮食可使体重(kg)(-6.43±4.34 比-4.11±4.27;P=0.02)、BMI(kg/m)(-3.19±2.90 比-1.43±2.72;P=0.01)、脂肪量(kg)(-4.88±2.09 比-3.72±2.43;P=0.03)、WC(cm)(-5.57±5.64 比-2.32±5.95;P=0.01)和 WHR(-0.05±0.06 比-0.02±0.07;P=0.04)显著降低。此外,hs-CRP 水平(mg/L)(-2.06±1.18 比-0.97±0.82;P=0.03)、凝血酶原时间(s)(1.41±2.34 比-0.41±2.17;P<0.001)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(s)(0.26±3.70 比-1.78±3.56;P=0.04)的变化在隔日禁食饮食组中也明显大于热量限制饮食组。然而,两组间 TNF-α或 IL-6 和纤维蛋白原无差异(P>0.05)。这些发现表明,隔日禁食饮食可以作为代谢综合征患者体重、脂肪量和 WC 以及 hs-CRP 和凝血因子水平管理的有益替代方法。