Huang Ben, Miao Shuxian, Xu Yan, Qiu Si-Jie, Yang Rui-Xia, Xu Hua-Guo
Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2025 Jun;39(12):e70052. doi: 10.1002/jcla.70052. Epub 2025 May 10.
In clinical practice, acute-phase reactive proteins (APRPs) are frequently measured at random times. However, it is unclear whether the use of fasting or nonfasting samples affects results. This study aims to investigate the variations of APRPs between fasting and nonfasting conditions.
This study was conducted based on the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) experiment due to standard energy intake and strict time flow. Fifty subjects were enrolled and underwent a 12-h fasting period before the experiment. Blood samples were collected the following day at baseline (fasting, T0) and 30 (T1), 60 (T2), 120 (T3), 180 (T4) minutes postglucose intake. A total of 250 blood samples were obtained. To quantify clinical fluctuations, percentage bias was calculated, and Bland-Altman plots were employed.
Our observational study demonstrated significant postprandial variations for APRPs. For CRP, 17 (34%) of 50 subjects at T1, 21 (42%) at T2, 23 (46%) at T3, and 16 (32%) at T4 exhibited levels exceeding the maximum allowable error in medical laboratory testing, indicating clinically unacceptable bias. For IL-6, thirty subjects (60%) at T1, 27 (54%) at T2, 28 (56%) at T3, and 32 (64%) at T4 displayed clinically unacceptable fluctuations. Among other APRPs, the maximum number of subjects exceeding acceptable bias thresholds was 28% (14/50) for procalcitonin, 38% (19/50) for transferrin, 34% (17/50) for prealbumin, and 24% (12/50) for ceruloplasmin.
Clinical fluctuations were observed in the levels of APRPs between fasting and nonfasting states. Clinicians should pay attention to the effects of dietary factors on test results.
在临床实践中,急性期反应蛋白(APRPs)通常在随机时间测量。然而,使用空腹或非空腹样本是否会影响结果尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查空腹和非空腹条件下APRPs的变化。
本研究基于口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)实验进行,因为能量摄入标准且时间流程严格。招募了50名受试者,在实验前进行12小时禁食。次日在基线(空腹,T0)以及葡萄糖摄入后30(T1)、60(T2)、120(T3)、180(T4)分钟采集血样。共获得250份血样。为了量化临床波动情况,计算了百分比偏差,并采用了布兰德-奥特曼图。
我们的观察性研究表明,APRPs存在显著的餐后变化。对于CRP,50名受试者中,T1时17名(34%)、T2时21名(42%)、T3时23名(46%)、T4时16名(32%)的水平超过了医学实验室检测的最大允许误差,表明存在临床上不可接受的偏差。对于IL-6,T1时30名受试者(60%)、T2时27名(54%)、T3时28名(56%)、T4时32名(64%)表现出临床上不可接受的波动。在其他APRPs中,超过可接受偏差阈值的受试者最大比例分别为:降钙素原28%(14/50)、转铁蛋白38%(19/50)、前白蛋白34%(17/50)、铜蓝蛋白24%(12/50)。
观察到空腹和非空腹状态下APRPs水平存在临床波动。临床医生应注意饮食因素对检测结果的影响。