Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):3015-3022. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06460-w. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
To differentiate supratentorial single brain metastasis (MET) from glioblastoma (GBM) by using radiomic features derived from the peri-enhancing oedema region and multiple classifiers.
One hundred and twenty single brain METs and GBMs were retrospectively reviewed and then randomly divided into a training data set (70%) and validation data set (30%). Quantitative radiomic features of each case were extracted from the peri-enhancing oedema region of conventional MR images. After feature selection, five classifiers were built. Additionally, the combined use of the classifiers was studied. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the classification performance.
A total of 321 features were extracted, and 3 features were selected for each case. The 5 classifiers showed an accuracy of 0.70 to 0.76, sensitivity of 0.57 to 0.98, and specificity of 0.43 to 0.93 for the training data set, with an accuracy of 0.56 to 0.64, sensitivity of 0.39 to 0.78, and specificity of 0.50 to 0.89 for the validation data set. When combining the classifiers, the classification performance differed according to the combined mode and the agreement pattern of classifiers, and the greatest benefit was obtained when all the classifiers reached agreement using the same weight and simple majority vote method.
Three features derived from the peri-enhancing oedema region had moderate value in differentiating supratentorial single brain MET from GBM with five single classifiers. Combined use of classifiers, like multi-disciplinary team (MDT) consultation, could confer extra benefits, especially for those cases when all classifiers reach agreement.
• Radiomics provides a way to differentiate single brain MET between GBM by using conventional MR images. • The results of classifiers or algorithms themselves are also data, the transformation of the primary data. • Like MDT consultation, the combined use of multiple classifiers may confer extra benefits.
利用源于增强水肿区的放射组学特征和多个分类器,区分幕上单发脑转移瘤(MET)和胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)。
回顾性分析 120 例单发脑 MET 和 GBM,随机分为训练数据集(70%)和验证数据集(30%)。从常规磁共振成像的增强水肿区提取每个病例的定量放射组学特征。经过特征选择,构建了 5 个分类器。此外,还研究了分类器的联合使用。使用准确性、敏感性和特异性来评估分类性能。
共提取 321 个特征,每个病例选择 3 个特征。5 个分类器在训练数据集中的准确性为 0.70 至 0.76,敏感性为 0.57 至 0.98,特异性为 0.43 至 0.93,在验证数据集中的准确性为 0.56 至 0.64,敏感性为 0.39 至 0.78,特异性为 0.50 至 0.89。当联合使用分类器时,分类性能取决于联合模式和分类器的一致性模式,当所有分类器使用相同权重和简单多数投票方法达成一致时,可获得最大收益。
源于增强水肿区的 3 个特征与 5 个单一分类器结合,对区分幕上单发脑 MET 与 GBM 具有中等价值。分类器的联合使用,类似于多学科团队(MDT)咨询,可能会带来额外的益处,特别是当所有分类器达成一致时。
放射组学通过使用常规磁共振成像区分胶质母细胞瘤的单发脑转移瘤。
分类器或算法本身的结果也是数据,是原始数据的转换。
类似于 MDT 咨询,多个分类器的联合使用可能会带来额外的益处。