Institute of Clinical Medicine - Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
NMR Metabolomics Laboratory, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;74(1):277-286. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191226.
Accurate differentiation between neurodegenerative diseases is developing quickly and has reached an effective level in disease recognition. However, there has been less focus on effectively distinguishing the prodromal state from later dementia stages due to a lack of suitable biomarkers. We utilized the Disease State Index (DSI) machine learning classifier to see how well quantified metabolomics data compares to clinically used cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The metabolic profiles were quantified for 498 serum and CSF samples using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The patient cohorts in this study were dementia (with a clinical AD diagnosis) (N = 359), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (N = 96), and control patients with subjective memory complaints (N = 43). DSI classification was conducted for MCI (N = 51) and dementia (N = 214) patients with low CSF amyloid-β levels indicating AD pathology and controls without such amyloid pathology (N = 36). We saw that the conventional CSF markers of AD were better at classifying controls from both dementia and MCI patients. However, quantified metabolic subclasses were more effective in classifying MCI from dementia. Our results show the consistent effectiveness of traditional CSF biomarkers in AD diagnostics. However, these markers are relatively ineffective in differentiating between MCI and the dementia stage, where the quantified metabolomics data provided significant benefit.
神经退行性疾病的准确鉴别正在迅速发展,并在疾病识别方面达到了有效的水平。然而,由于缺乏合适的生物标志物,人们对如何有效地将前驱期与后期痴呆阶段区分开来的关注较少。我们利用疾病状态指数(DSI)机器学习分类器,研究量化代谢组学数据与阿尔茨海默病(AD)临床常用脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物的吻合程度。使用质子磁共振波谱对 498 份血清和 CSF 样本进行了代谢谱的定量分析。本研究的患者队列包括痴呆症(有临床 AD 诊断)(N=359)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)(N=96)和有主观记忆主诉的对照患者(N=43)。对 MCI(N=51)和痴呆症(N=214)患者进行了 DSI 分类,这些患者的 CSF 淀粉样蛋白-β水平较低,表明存在 AD 病理,而无此类淀粉样蛋白病理的对照患者(N=36)。我们发现,AD 的传统 CSF 标志物在区分痴呆症和 MCI 患者与对照方面更有效。然而,定量代谢亚类在区分 MCI 和痴呆症方面更有效。我们的结果表明传统 CSF 生物标志物在 AD 诊断中的一致性有效性。然而,这些标志物在区分 MCI 和痴呆症阶段方面相对无效,而量化代谢组学数据提供了显著的益处。