Division of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Division of Urology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Endourol. 2020 May;34(5):550-557. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0718. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Stone burden has been reported as an independent predictor of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL); however no consensus exists on a standardized method for measuring stone burden. Recently, stone volume has been advocated as the most accurate means of measuring stone burden. We aimed to compare different measuring methods of stone burden and to identify the predictive value of each for outcomes after PCNL. We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent PCNL between 2006 and 2013. A preoperative CT and postoperative imaging at discharge were necessary for eligibility. Stone burden was assessed through four different ways on CT images: (1) cumulative stone diameter; (2) estimated SA (surface area) calculated as longest × orthogonal diameter × π/4; (3) manual outline of stone and computer SA calculation; and (4) automated 3D volume calculation using specific software. Primary outcome was stone-free status (SFS) at discharge. Secondary outcomes included operative time and the need for an ancillary procedure. Regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to evaluate the predictive value of each method. Of 313 included patients, 69.6% were stone free at discharge. All measures of stone burden were independent predictors of SFS [OR and 95% CI of 1.027 (1.014, 1.040), 1.481 (1.180, 1.858), 1.736 (1.266, 2.380), and 1.311 (1.127, 1.526), respectively] and demonstrated similar predictive accuracy (area under the curve = 0.630, 0.630, 0.627, and 0.638, respectively). Stone burden by any measure was an independent predictor of operative time and secondary procedure. We demonstrated that measuring stone burden by manual outline or automated 3D volume on reformatted CT images had no added value compared with orthogonal measurement for predicting outcomes after PCNL.
结石负荷被报道为经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)后无石率的独立预测因子;然而,目前对于测量结石负荷的标准化方法尚无共识。最近,结石体积已被认为是测量结石负荷最准确的方法。我们旨在比较结石负荷的不同测量方法,并确定每种方法对 PCNL 后结果的预测价值。
我们对 2006 年至 2013 年间接受 PCNL 的患者的前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性研究。入选标准为术前 CT 检查和术后出院时的影像学检查。通过 CT 图像对结石负荷进行了四种不同的评估:(1)累积结石直径;(2)估计的 SA(表面积),计算方法为最长直径×正交直径×π/4;(3)手动勾画结石并使用计算机计算 SA;(4)使用特定软件进行自动 3D 体积计算。主要结局是出院时的无石状态(SFS)。次要结局包括手术时间和辅助治疗的需要。回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线分析用于评估每种方法的预测价值。
在 313 例纳入的患者中,69.6%的患者在出院时无结石。所有结石负荷测量均为 SFS 的独立预测因子[比值比和 95%可信区间分别为 1.027(1.014,1.040)、1.481(1.180,1.858)、1.736(1.266,2.380)和 1.311(1.127,1.526)],并具有相似的预测准确性(曲线下面积分别为 0.630、0.630、0.627 和 0.638)。任何一种测量方法的结石负荷都是手术时间和辅助治疗的独立预测因子。
我们证明,与正交测量相比,在 CT 图像的矢状位或自动 3D 体积测量结石负荷在预测 PCNL 后结果方面没有额外的价值。