Suppr超能文献

从医疗保健投诉中学习:对学术文献、政策证据和一线观点的现实主义综述。

Learning from complaints in healthcare: a realist review of academic literature, policy evidence and front-line insights.

机构信息

Centre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK

Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Aug;29(8):684-695. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009704. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A global rise in patient complaints has been accompanied by growing research to effectively analyse complaints for safer, more patient-centric care. Most patients and families complain to improve the quality of healthcare, yet progress has been complicated by a system primarily designed for case-by-case complaint handling.

AIM

To understand how to effectively integrate patient-centric complaint handling with quality monitoring and improvement.

METHOD

Literature screening and patient codesign shaped the review's aim in the first stage of this three-stage review. Ten sources were searched including academic databases and policy archives. In the second stage, 13 front-line experts were interviewed to develop initial practice-based programme theory. In the third stage, evidence identified in the first stage was appraised based on rigour and relevance, and selected to refine programme theory focusing on what works, why and under what circumstances.

RESULTS

A total of 74 academic and 10 policy sources were included. The review identified 12 mechanisms to achieve: patient-centric complaint handling and system-wide quality improvement. The complaint handling pathway includes (1) access of information; (2) collaboration with support and advocacy services; (3) staff attitude and signposting; (4) bespoke responding; and (5) public accountability. The improvement pathway includes (6) a reliable coding taxonomy; (7) standardised training and guidelines; (8) a centralised informatics system; (9) appropriate data sampling; (10) mixed-methods spotlight analysis; (11) board priorities and leadership; and (12) just culture.

DISCUSSION

If healthcare settings are better supported to report, analyse and use complaints data in a standardised manner, complaints could impact on care quality in important ways. This review has established a range of evidence-based, short-term recommendations to achieve this.

摘要

简介

患者投诉的全球增长伴随着越来越多的研究,以有效地分析投诉,为更安全、更以患者为中心的护理提供依据。大多数患者和家属投诉是为了提高医疗保健质量,但由于系统主要是为了逐个处理投诉而设计的,因此进展一直很复杂。

目的

了解如何有效地将以患者为中心的投诉处理与质量监测和改进相结合。

方法

文献筛选和患者共同设计塑造了本三阶段审查第一阶段的审查目标。共搜索了包括学术数据库和政策档案在内的 10 个来源。在第二阶段,采访了 13 名一线专家,以制定初步的基于实践的计划理论。在第三阶段,根据严谨性和相关性评估第一阶段确定的证据,并选择证据来完善以患者为中心的投诉处理和全系统质量改进的计划理论。

结果

共纳入 74 篇学术文献和 10 篇政策文献。该审查确定了 12 种实现机制:以患者为中心的投诉处理和全系统质量改进。投诉处理途径包括(1)获取信息;(2)与支持和宣传服务合作;(3)员工态度和指示;(4)定制响应;(5)公开问责制。改进途径包括(6)可靠的编码分类法;(7)标准化培训和指南;(8)集中的信息系统;(9)适当的数据抽样;(10)混合方法重点分析;(11)董事会优先事项和领导力;(12)公正文化。

讨论

如果医疗保健环境得到更好的支持,以标准化的方式报告、分析和使用投诉数据,投诉可以以重要的方式影响护理质量。本审查确定了一系列基于证据的短期建议来实现这一目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验