Gasparro Roberta, Sammartino Gilberto, Mariniello Mauro, di Lauro Alessandro Espedito, Spagnuolo Gianrico, Marenzi Gaetano
Quintessence Int. 2020;51(3):204-211. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a43947.
Presence of clinical attachment loss on the distal aspect to the second molar may be associated with malposition of the third molar. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reduction of clinical attachment loss at the distal aspect of the second molar after third molar extraction and application of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF).
Eighteen subjects with a clinical attachment loss on the distal site to the second molar associated with impacted third molar in both sides of the jaw were recruited for the study. For each subject the teeth were randomly allocated in test and control groups. After surgical removal of the impacted third molar, the L-PRF was inserted in the fresh alveolar socket of test sites; in the control sites no graft was inserted after extraction. Full-mouth plaque score, full-mouth bleeding score, clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth, and gingival recession were assessed at baseline and 6 months later.
After 6 months, mean CAL change was 1.99 ± 1.18 mm in the test group and 1.15 ± 1.01 mm in the control group; probing depth change was 1.33 ± 0.87 mm in the test group and 0.50 ± 0.63 mm in the control group. Statistically significant differences (P < .05) were observed between groups in terms of CAL and probing depth changes. No differences were found in gingival recession changes.
Within the limits of the present study, the sites treated by means of application of L-PRF after impacted third molar extraction showed better results in terms of CAL gain and probing depth reduction when compared with control sites.
第二磨牙远中临床附着丧失的存在可能与第三磨牙的错位有关。本研究的目的是评估拔除第三磨牙并应用富白细胞和血小板纤维蛋白(L-PRF)后,第二磨牙远中临床附着丧失的减少情况。
招募了18名双侧下颌第二磨牙远中部位存在与阻生第三磨牙相关的临床附着丧失的受试者进行研究。对于每个受试者,牙齿被随机分配到试验组和对照组。在手术拔除阻生第三磨牙后,将L-PRF插入试验部位的新鲜牙槽窝;对照组拔牙后不植入移植物。在基线和6个月后评估全口菌斑评分、全口出血评分、临床附着水平(CAL)、探诊深度和牙龈退缩情况。
6个月后,试验组平均CAL变化为1.99±1.18mm,对照组为1.15±1.01mm;试验组探诊深度变化为1.33±0.87mm,对照组为0.50±0.63mm。在CAL和探诊深度变化方面,两组间观察到统计学显著差异(P<.05)。牙龈退缩变化未发现差异。
在本研究的范围内,与对照组相比,阻生第三磨牙拔除后应用L-PRF治疗的部位在CAL增加和探诊深度减少方面显示出更好的结果。