• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单颗种植体支持式冠修复中基台螺丝松动的相关因素:一项横断面研究。

Factors associated with abutment screw loosening in single implant supported crowns: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Londhe S M, Gowda E Mahesh, Mandlik V B, Shashidhar M P

机构信息

Commandant and Command Dental Adviser (Southern Command), Pune 411040, India.

Consultant (Prosthodontics), Command Military Dental Centre (Southern Command), Pune 411040, India.

出版信息

Med J Armed Forces India. 2020 Jan;76(1):37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.06.011
PMID:32020966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6994738/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implant restorations are considered an ideal treatment option for replacement of missing teeth in partially edentulous patients. Abutment screw loosening is one of the frequently observed technical complications of implant-supported prosthesis. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with the abutment screw loosening in cement-retained single-implant crowns.

METHODS

Enrolment criteria included partially edentulous patients who have been rehabilitated with one or more cement-retained single-implant crowns with minimum postcementation period of 1 year. They were recalled and evaluated for the presence or absence of screw loosening both clinically and radiographically. They were further evaluated for the presence or absence of factors associated with screw loosening such as parafunctional habits, wider occlusal table, steep cuspal inclines, non-axial loading and cantilevering of the pontic.

RESULTS

Twenty-six cement-retained single-implant crowns out of 280 showed screw loosening, making the overall prevalence rate of 10.77%. Among the factors evaluated, parafunctional habits were associated with three cases, wider occlusal table in four, steep cuspal inclines in three, non-axial loading in nine and cantilevering of the pontic in three cases. Exact reasons could not be ascertained in four cases.

CONCLUSION

Abutment screw loosening seems to be a significant prosthetic complication of cement-retained single-implant crowns. Factors evaluated significantly affect the functional durability of the prosthesis. These factors should be considered while restoring to enhance the longevity of such restorations.

摘要

背景

种植体修复被认为是部分牙列缺损患者缺失牙替代的理想治疗选择。基台螺丝松动是种植体支持修复体常见的技术并发症之一。本研究旨在确定粘结固位单颗种植体牙冠基台螺丝松动的患病率及相关因素。

方法

纳入标准包括部分牙列缺损患者,这些患者已通过一颗或多颗粘结固位单颗种植体牙冠进行修复,且粘结后最短观察期为1年。对他们进行复诊,通过临床和影像学评估螺丝是否松动。进一步评估与螺丝松动相关的因素,如副功能习惯、较宽的咬合面、陡峭的牙尖斜面、非轴向负荷和桥体悬臂。

结果

280颗粘结固位单颗种植体牙冠中有26颗出现螺丝松动,总体患病率为10.77%。在评估的因素中,副功能习惯与3例相关,较宽的咬合面与4例相关,陡峭的牙尖斜面与3例相关,非轴向负荷与9例相关,桥体悬臂与3例相关。4例无法确定确切原因。

结论

基台螺丝松动似乎是粘结固位单颗种植体牙冠的一种重要修复并发症。评估的因素显著影响修复体的功能耐久性。在修复时应考虑这些因素,以提高此类修复体的使用寿命。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with abutment screw loosening in single implant supported crowns: A cross-sectional study.单颗种植体支持式冠修复中基台螺丝松动的相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2020 Jan;76(1):37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
2
Loosening of the fixing screw in single implant crowns: predisposing factors, prevention and treatment options.单颗种植体冠修复体固定螺丝松动:诱发因素、预防及处理方案。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Jul 8;29(4):233-246. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12303. Epub 2017 May 27.
3
A technique for repairing a loosening abutment screw for a cement-retained implant prosthesis.一种用于修复固位水泥型种植体修复体松动基台螺丝的技术。
J Prosthodont. 2011 Dec;20(8):652-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00748.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
4
A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.私人诊所种植治疗及并发症的5年回顾性分析:单颗及短跨度种植支持固定义齿的修复并发症
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):435-44. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4794.
5
The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations.种植体直径、修复体设计和咬合面变化对后牙单颗种植体修复体螺钉松动的影响。
J Oral Implantol. 2001;27(2):63-72. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0063:TEOIDR>2.3.CO;2.
6
A technique for locating implant abutment screws of posterior cement-retained metal-ceramic restorations with ceramic occlusal surfaces.一种用于定位后牙粘结式金属烤瓷修复体种植基台螺钉的技术,该修复体具有陶瓷咬合面。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Feb;95(2):165-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.010.
7
Evaluation of Prosthodontic Complications in Screw-Retained and Cement-Retained Crowns in Dental Implants: An Original Research.牙种植体中螺丝固位和粘结固位冠修复后口腔修复并发症的评估:一项原创研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S609-S612. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_890_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
Clinical evaluation of the incidence of prosthetic complications in implant crowns constructed with UCLA castable abutments. A cohort follow-up study.采用 UCLA 可铸造基台制作种植体冠的修复体并发症发生率的临床评估。一项队列随访研究。
J Dent. 2012 Dec;40(12):1081-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
9
Clinical study on screw loosening in dental implant prostheses: a 6-year retrospective study.牙种植修复体中螺钉松动的临床研究:一项6年回顾性研究。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Apr 30;46(2):133-142. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.2.133.
10
A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.螺丝固位和粘结固位的种植体支持金属烤瓷冠的瓷抗折性比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Jun;91(6):532-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Screw Coating as a Solution to Solve Screw Loosening Complications: An In Vitro Study.螺旋涂层作为解决螺钉松动并发症的一种方法:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;18(12):2921. doi: 10.3390/ma18122921.
2
Effect of different agents on preload force of dental implants with bio high-performance poly-ether-ether-ketone abutments.不同制剂对采用生物高性能聚醚醚酮基台的牙种植体预载力的影响
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Nov-Dec;14(6):756-760. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.10.004. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
3
Monolithic Hybrid Abutment Crowns (Screw-Retained) Versus Monolithic Hybrid Abutments With Monolithic Crowns (Adhesively Cemented): Three-Year Data of a Prospective Clinical Split-Mouth Study.整体式混合基台冠(螺丝固位)与带整体式冠的整体式混合基台(粘结固定):一项前瞻性临床双侧对照研究的三年数据
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jan;37(1):126-141. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13335. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
4
Dimensions of Posterior Implant Restorations Related to Intra-Coronal Cantilever and Occlusal Forces: An In Vitro Study.与冠内悬臂和咬合力相关的后牙种植修复体尺寸:一项体外研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Oct 19;37(2):577-85. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13343.
5
Influence of Framework Material and Abutment Configuration on Fatigue Performance in Dental Implant Systems: A Finite Element Analysis.基台形态和连接体设计对牙种植系统疲劳性能的影响:有限元分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 6;60(9):1463. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091463.
6
The mechanical complications and behavior of angulated dental implant abutment systems versus conventional abutments, a narrative review.角度式牙种植体基台系统与传统基台的机械并发症及性能:一篇叙述性综述
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Aug;36(8):1072-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
7
Evaluation of Different Subperiosteal Implant Thicknesses on Mechanical Strength and Stress on Bone by Finite Element Analysis.基于有限元分析的不同骨膜下植入物厚度对机械强度和骨应力的评估。
Int J Med Sci. 2024 Jun 17;21(9):1672-1680. doi: 10.7150/ijms.91620. eCollection 2024.
8
The effect of different implant-abutment types and heights on screw loosening in cases with increased crown height space.不同种植体-基台类型和高度对增加冠高度空间病例中螺钉松动的影响。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Jun;10(3):e894. doi: 10.1002/cre2.894.
9
effect of anodization of titanium abutments on their tensile bond strength to implant-supported lithium disilicate all-ceramic crowns.钛基台阳极氧化对其与种植体支持的二硅酸锂全瓷冠的拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Sep 27;20:99. eCollection 2023.
10
To determine the effect of plasma nitriding treatment 56 on screw loosening and surface topography of different 78 implant-abutment screw systems with and without thermocycling: An study.研究目的:确定等离子体渗氮处理 56 对不同种植体-基台螺钉系统在有无冷热循环情况下的螺钉松动和表面形貌的影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):285-293. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_147_23.

本文引用的文献

1
Stability of external and internal implant connections after a fatigue test.疲劳试验后外部和内部种植体连接的稳定性
Eur J Dent. 2013 Jul;7(3):267-271. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.115407.
2
Effect of dental implant diameter on fatigue performance. Part I: mechanical behavior.牙种植体直径对疲劳性能的影响。第一部分:力学行为。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Apr;16(2):172-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00477.x. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
3
Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.保留粘结剂的种植体支持固定修复体的修复效果:系统评价。
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Sep;38(9):697-711. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02209.x. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
4
Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).牙支持式固定义齿(FDPs)、种植体支持式FDPs及单冠(SCs)的生存率和并发症发生率比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:97-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x.
5
Screw loosening for standard and wide diameter implants in partially edentulous cases: 3- to 7-year longitudinal data.部分牙列缺损病例中标准直径和大直径种植体的螺钉松动:3至7年的纵向数据
Implant Dent. 2004 Sep;13(3):245-50. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000140459.87333.f8.
6
Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses.植入物及植入式假体的临床并发症。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Aug;90(2):121-32. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9.
7
Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants.骨整合种植体的临床并发症
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 May;81(5):537-52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70208-8.
8
Wide diameter implants: indications, considerations and preliminary results over a two-year period.大直径种植体:适应症、注意事项及两年期初步结果
Aust Prosthodont J. 1994;8:31-7.
9
Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study.单颗骨内种植体修复上颌和下颌磨牙的回顾性研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Jul;74(1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80229-x.
10
Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.牙种植体基台螺钉的伸长和预紧应力。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 Sep-Oct;10(5):529-36.