• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为与错觉:一种在参与者替换实验中研究迷信的模型。

Behavior and illusions: a model to study superstition in a participant replacement experiment.

作者信息

Benvenuti Marcelo Frota Lobato, de Toledo Thais Ferro Nogara, Velasco Saulo Missiaggia, Duarte Flavia Meneses

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, São Paulo, Brazil.

Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino, São Carlos, Brazil.

出版信息

Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018 Jul 3;31(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41155-018-0097-9.

DOI:10.1186/s41155-018-0097-9
PMID:32025978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6966743/
Abstract

The notion of superstitious behavior can provide a basic background for understanding such notions as illusions and beliefs. The present study investigated the social mechanism of the transmission of superstitious behavior in an experiment that utilized participant replacement. The sample was composed of a total of 38 participants. Participants performed a task on a computer: they could click a colored rectangle using the mouse. When the rectangle was in a particular color, the participants received points independently of their behavior (variable time schedule). When the color of the rectangle was changed, no points were presented (extinction). Under an Individual Exposure condition, ten participants worked alone on the task. Other participants were exposed to the same experimental task under a Social Exposure condition, in which each participant first learned by observation and then worked on the task in a participant replacement (chain) procedure. The first participant in each chain in the Social Exposure condition was a confederate who worked on the task "superstitiously," clicking the rectangle when points were presented. Superstitious responding was transmitted because of the behavior of the confederate. This also influenced estimates of personal control. These findings suggest that social learning can facilitate the acquisition and maintenance of superstitious behavior and the illusion of control. Our data also suggest that superstitious behavior and the illusion of control may involve similar learning principles.

摘要

迷信行为的概念可以为理解诸如错觉和信念等概念提供一个基本背景。本研究在一项采用参与者替换的实验中,调查了迷信行为传播的社会机制。样本总共由38名参与者组成。参与者在电脑上执行一项任务:他们可以用鼠标点击一个彩色矩形。当矩形为特定颜色时,参与者无论其行为如何都会获得分数(可变时间安排)。当矩形颜色改变时,就不会有分数(消退)。在个体暴露条件下,十名参与者独自完成任务。其他参与者在社会暴露条件下接受相同的实验任务,在该条件下,每个参与者首先通过观察学习,然后在参与者替换(连锁)程序中完成任务。社会暴露条件下每个连锁中的第一名参与者是一名同盟者,他“迷信地”完成任务,在出现分数时点击矩形。由于同盟者的行为,迷信反应得以传播。这也影响了对个人控制的估计。这些发现表明,社会学习可以促进迷信行为的习得和维持以及控制错觉。我们的数据还表明,迷信行为和控制错觉可能涉及相似的学习原则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d6/6966743/8040698dba9c/41155_2018_97_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d6/6966743/1053a06380b0/41155_2018_97_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d6/6966743/b37a0a1e70c4/41155_2018_97_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d6/6966743/b5dd4e227738/41155_2018_97_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d6/6966743/8040698dba9c/41155_2018_97_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d6/6966743/1053a06380b0/41155_2018_97_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d6/6966743/b37a0a1e70c4/41155_2018_97_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d6/6966743/b5dd4e227738/41155_2018_97_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d6/6966743/8040698dba9c/41155_2018_97_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Behavior and illusions: a model to study superstition in a participant replacement experiment.行为与错觉:一种在参与者替换实验中研究迷信的模型。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018 Jul 3;31(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41155-018-0097-9.
2
[Is superstitious behavior more easily acquired by negative reinforcement schedules than positive reinforcement schedules? Examinations of the polarity and the duration of a consequence].迷信行为通过负强化程序比正强化程序更容易习得吗?对结果的极性和持续时间的考察
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2014 Feb;84(6):625-31. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.84.625.
3
Superstition predicts perception of illusory control.迷信预测虚幻控制的感知。
Br J Psychol. 2019 Aug;110(3):499-518. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12344. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
4
Superstitious Perception: Comparing Perceptual Prediction by Humans and Neural Networks.迷信感知:人类与神经网络的感知预测比较
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2019;41:213-243. doi: 10.1007/7854_2018_65.
5
Superstitious behavior in humans.人类的迷信行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):261-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-261.
6
Reliance on luck: identifying which achievement goals elicit superstitious behavior.对运气的依赖:确定哪些成就目标会引发迷信行为。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Mar;41(3):323-35. doi: 10.1177/0146167214565055. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
7
Superstition revisited: Sex, species, and adventitious reinforcement.再谈迷信:性别、物种与偶发强化。
Behav Processes. 2020 Jan;170:103979. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103979. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
8
Effect of delay of reinforcement on superstitious inferences.强化延迟对迷信推断的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Jun;90(3 Pt 1):1047-58. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.3.1047.
9
Reducing the illusion of control when an action is followed by an undesired outcome.当一个行为之后紧接着出现不期望的结果时,减少控制错觉。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug;21(4):1087-93. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0584-7.
10
Superstitious behavior in sport: A literature review.体育中的迷信行为:文献综述
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Aug;57(4):368-82. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12301.

引用本文的文献

1
Research and Training in Culturo-Behavior Science.文化行为科学的研究与培训。
Behav Soc Issues. 2021;30(1):237-275. doi: 10.1007/s42822-021-00076-w. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
Editorial: Emerging Cultural and Behavioral Systems Science.社论:新兴的文化与行为系统科学
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Dec 2;42(4):699-711. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00237-8. eCollection 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal illusions in children when the outcome is frequent.当结果频繁出现时儿童的因果错觉。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 12;12(9):e0184707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184707. eCollection 2017.
2
Positive and negative implications of the causal illusion.因果错觉的积极和消极影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Apr;50:56-68. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
3
Single- and Dual-Process Models of Biased Contingency Detection.偏差性意外事件检测的单过程和双过程模型
Exp Psychol. 2016 Jan;63(1):3-19. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000309.
4
Experimental and theoretical models of human cultural evolution.人类文化进化的实验和理论模型。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014 May;5(3):317-26. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1288. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
5
Exploring the factors that encourage the illusions of control: the case of preventive illusions.探究促使控制错觉产生的因素:以预防性错觉为例。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(2):131-42. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000280.
6
Interactive effects of the probability of the cue and the probability of the outcome on the overestimation of null contingency.线索概率和结果概率对零偶然性高估的交互作用。
Learn Behav. 2013 Dec;41(4):333-40. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0108-8.
7
Mediating role of activity level in the depressive realism effect.活动水平在抑郁现实主义效应中的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046203. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
8
Transmission fidelity is the key to the build-up of cumulative culture.传播保真度是累积文化构建的关键。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2171-80. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0119.
9
Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience.错觉因果关系是伪科学的核心。
Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):392-405. doi: 10.1348/000712610X532210. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
10
Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: the role of action in the illusion of control.让不可控之事看似可控:行动在控制错觉中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jul;64(7):1290-304. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.552727.