• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活动水平在抑郁现实主义效应中的中介作用。

Mediating role of activity level in the depressive realism effect.

机构信息

Departamento de Fundamentos y Métodos de la Psicología, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046203. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0046203
PMID:23029435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3459889/
Abstract

Several classic studies have concluded that the accuracy of identifying uncontrollable situations depends heavily on depressive mood. Nondepressed participants tend to exhibit an optimistic illusion of control, whereas depressed participants tend to better detect a lack of control. Recently, we suggested that the different activity levels (measured as the probability of responding during a contingency learning task) exhibited by depressed and nondepressed individuals is partly responsible for this effect. The two studies presented in this paper provide further support for this mediational hypothesis, in which mood is the distal cause of the illusion of control operating through activity level, the proximal cause. In Study 1, the probability of responding, P(R), was found to be a mediator variable between the depressive symptoms and the judgments of control. In Study 2, we intervened directly on the mediator variable: The P(R) for both depressed and nondepressed participants was manipulated through instructions. Our results confirm that P(R) manipulation produced differences in the participants' perceptions of uncontrollability. Importantly, the intervention on the mediator variable cancelled the effect of the distal cause; the participants' judgments of control were no longer mood dependent when the P(R) was manipulated. This result supports the hypothesis that the so-called depressive realism effect is actually mediated by the probability of responding.

摘要

几项经典研究得出结论,识别不可控情况的准确性在很大程度上取决于抑郁情绪。非抑郁参与者往往表现出乐观的控制错觉,而抑郁参与者往往更能发现缺乏控制。最近,我们提出,抑郁和非抑郁个体表现出的不同活动水平(以在应急学习任务中的反应概率来衡量)部分解释了这种效应。本文介绍的两项研究进一步支持了这种中介假设,即情绪是通过活动水平(近端原因)影响控制错觉的远程原因。在研究 1 中,反应概率 P(R) 被发现是抑郁症状和控制判断之间的中介变量。在研究 2 中,我们直接干预了中介变量:通过指令操纵抑郁和非抑郁参与者的 P(R)。我们的结果证实,P(R)操纵会导致参与者对不可控性的感知产生差异。重要的是,当 P(R)被操纵时,中介变量的干预消除了远程原因的影响;当 P(R)被操纵时,参与者对控制的判断不再取决于情绪。这一结果支持了这样一种假设,即所谓的抑郁现实主义效应实际上是由反应概率介导的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569a/3459889/1aba020bd0fa/pone.0046203.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569a/3459889/8e1f9688f165/pone.0046203.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569a/3459889/19c2b9fda27a/pone.0046203.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569a/3459889/c9c43d1864ed/pone.0046203.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569a/3459889/1aba020bd0fa/pone.0046203.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569a/3459889/8e1f9688f165/pone.0046203.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569a/3459889/19c2b9fda27a/pone.0046203.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569a/3459889/c9c43d1864ed/pone.0046203.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569a/3459889/1aba020bd0fa/pone.0046203.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Mediating role of activity level in the depressive realism effect.活动水平在抑郁现实主义效应中的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046203. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
2
Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive, and negative contingencies.抑郁现实主义以及试验间隔对零、正性和负性偶然性判断的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Mar;60(3):461-81. doi: 10.1080/17470210601002595.
3
Metacognition and depressive realism: evidence for the level-of-depression account.元认知与抑郁现实主义:抑郁程度解释的证据
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2011 Sep;16(5):461-72. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2011.557921. Epub 2011 May 24.
4
Confidence judgment in depression and dysphoria: the depressive realism vs. negativity hypotheses.抑郁和苦闷中的自信判断:抑郁现实主义与消极性假说。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;43(2):699-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
5
The sad truth about depressive realism.关于抑郁现实主义的可悲真相。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Mar;60(3):482-95. doi: 10.1080/17470210601002686.
6
Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?抑郁和非抑郁学生的偶然性判断:越悲伤越明智?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1979 Dec;108(4):441-85. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441.
7
Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: the role of action in the illusion of control.让不可控之事看似可控:行动在控制错觉中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jul;64(7):1290-304. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.552727.
8
Depressive realism and clinical depression.抑郁现实主义与临床抑郁症。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Apr;48(4):257-65. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
9
Depressive realism: a meta-analytic review.抑郁现实主义:元分析综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):496-509. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Depressive cognition: a test of depressive realism versus negativity using general knowledge questions.
J Psychol. 2001 Nov;135(6):583-602. doi: 10.1080/00223980109603722.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of educational approaches to reduce cognitive biases among students.减少学生认知偏差的教育方法的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02253-y.
2
Reducing the causal illusion: a question of motivation or of information?减少因果错觉:是动机问题还是信息问题?
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jun 18;12(6):250082. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250082. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Behavior and illusions: a model to study superstition in a participant replacement experiment.行为与错觉:一种在参与者替换实验中研究迷信的模型。

本文引用的文献

1
Depressive realism: a meta-analytic review.抑郁现实主义:元分析综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):496-509. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 22.
2
Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: the role of action in the illusion of control.让不可控之事看似可控:行动在控制错觉中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jul;64(7):1290-304. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.552727.
3
Just tell me what to do: bringing back experimenter control in active contingency tasks with the command-performance procedure and finding cue density effects along the way.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018 Jul 3;31(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41155-018-0097-9.
4
Causal Illusions in the Service of Political Attitudes in Spain and the United Kingdom.西班牙和英国政治态度中的因果错觉
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 28;9:1033. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01033. eCollection 2018.
5
Understanding psychiatric disorder by capturing ecologically relevant features of learning and decision-making.通过捕捉学习和决策中与生态相关的特征来理解精神障碍。
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Dec 14;355:56-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.09.050. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
6
Causal illusions in children when the outcome is frequent.当结果频繁出现时儿童的因果错觉。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 12;12(9):e0184707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184707. eCollection 2017.
7
Three Ways That Non-associative Knowledge May Affect Associative Learning Processes.非联想性知识可能影响联想学习过程的三种方式。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 27;7:2024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02024. eCollection 2016.
8
Causal Learning in Gambling Disorder: Beyond the Illusion of Control.赌博障碍中的因果学习:超越控制错觉
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Jun;33(2):705-717. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9634-6.
9
The relationship between mood state and perceived control in contingency learning: effects of individualist and collectivist values.权变学习中情绪状态与感知控制之间的关系:个人主义和集体主义价值观的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 29;6:1430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01430. eCollection 2015.
10
Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced.因果关系错觉:它们如何影响我们的日常思维以及如何减少这些错觉
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 2;6:888. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888. eCollection 2015.
告诉我该怎么做:通过指令执行程序在主动应急任务中恢复实验者控制,并在此过程中发现线索密度效应。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Mar;63(1):59-73. doi: 10.1037/a0013403.
4
Illusion of control in Internet users and college students.互联网用户和大学生的控制错觉
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Apr;10(2):176-81. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9971.
5
The sad truth about depressive realism.关于抑郁现实主义的可悲真相。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Mar;60(3):482-95. doi: 10.1080/17470210601002686.
6
Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive, and negative contingencies.抑郁现实主义以及试验间隔对零、正性和负性偶然性判断的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Mar;60(3):461-81. doi: 10.1080/17470210601002595.
7
Depressive realism and outcome density bias in contingency judgments: the effect of the context and intertrial interval.意外事件判断中的抑郁现实主义与结果密度偏差:情境与试验间隔的影响
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Feb;134(1):10-22. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.10.
8
Human research and data collection via the internet.通过互联网进行的人体研究和数据收集。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:803-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601.
9
An inventory for measuring depression.一份用于测量抑郁的量表。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004.
10
The effect of non-contingent negative and positive reinforcement operations on the acquisition of superstitious behaviors.非偶然的负性和正性强化操作对迷信行为习得的影响。
Behav Processes. 2003 Feb 28;61(1-2):37-45. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00158-4.