• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会不平等与抑郁症状患病率:2014年对墨西哥边境城市女性的横断面研究

Social inequalities and prevalence of depressive symptoms: a cross-sectional study of women in a Mexican border city, 2014.

作者信息

Calderon-Villarreal Alheli, Mujica Oscar J, Bojorquez Ietza

机构信息

El Colegio de la Frontera Norte El Colegio de la Frontera Norte Tijuana Mexico El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, Tijuana, Mexico.

Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization Washington, DC United States of America Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States of America.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020 Feb 5;44:e9. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2020.9. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2020.9
PMID:32038725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7001124/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between intersectional disadvantage and clinically significant depressive symptoms (CSDS), describing the magnitude of social inequalities in the prevalence of symptoms among adult women in Tijuana, Mexico.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. CSDS were assessed using the Centers for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among a probability sample of 2 345 women from 18 - 65 years of age in 2014. CSDS prevalence was calculated according to categories of three social stratifiers: socioeconomic status (SES), educational attainment, and fertility (number of children). Social inequality was measured with the slope index of inequality (SII) and the concentration index (CIx). Intersectionality among stratifiers was explored descriptively and with multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

CSDS prevalence was 17.7% (95%CI: 15.1% - 21.0%). The SII and CIx showed inequity in all social stratifiers. The absolute difference in CSDS prevalence between the lowest and highest ends of the SES gradient was 21.9% (95%CI: 21.5% - 22.4%). Among the most disadvantaged women, i.e., those at the intersection of lowest SES, lowest educational attainment, and highest fertility, the CSDS prevalence was 39.5% (95% CI: 26.0% - 52.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Disadvantage along multiple axes was associated with CSDS. Efforts to improve the mental health of women should include equity-oriented policies that address its social determinants.

摘要

目的

评估交叉性劣势与具有临床意义的抑郁症状(CSDS)之间的关联,描述墨西哥蒂华纳成年女性中症状患病率方面的社会不平等程度。

方法

这是一项横断面研究。2014年,在2345名年龄在18至65岁的女性概率样本中,使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表评估CSDS。根据社会经济地位(SES)、教育程度和生育情况(子女数量)这三个社会分层因素的类别计算CSDS患病率。用不平等斜率指数(SII)和集中指数(CIx)衡量社会不平等。对分层因素之间的交叉性进行描述性探索,并进行多变量回归分析。

结果

CSDS患病率为17.7%(95%置信区间:15.1% - 21.0%)。SII和CIx在所有社会分层因素中均显示出不平等。SES梯度最低端和最高端之间CSDS患病率的绝对差异为21.9%(95%置信区间:21.5% - 22.4%)。在最弱势的女性中,即处于最低SES、最低教育程度和最高生育情况交叉点的女性,CSDS患病率为39.5%(95%置信区间:26.0% - 52.9%)。

结论

多方面的劣势与CSDS相关。改善女性心理健康的努力应包括针对其社会决定因素的公平导向政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b4/7001124/7c26cf4d50ec/rpsp-44-e9_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b4/7001124/f58b18bb7f5d/rpsp-44-e9_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b4/7001124/7c26cf4d50ec/rpsp-44-e9_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b4/7001124/f58b18bb7f5d/rpsp-44-e9_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b4/7001124/7c26cf4d50ec/rpsp-44-e9_Figure2.jpg

相似文献

1
Social inequalities and prevalence of depressive symptoms: a cross-sectional study of women in a Mexican border city, 2014.社会不平等与抑郁症状患病率:2014年对墨西哥边境城市女性的横断面研究
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020 Feb 5;44:e9. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2020.9. eCollection 2020.
2
Use of oral health care services in the United States: unequal, inequitable-a cross-sectional study.美国口腔保健服务的使用情况:不平等、不公平——一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01708-8.
3
Delivery channels and socioeconomic inequalities in coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: analysis of 36 cross-sectional surveys in low-income and middle-income countries.生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的提供渠道和社会经济不平等:对低收入和中等收入国家的 36 项横断面调查的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1101-e1109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00204-7. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
Alcohol control policies and socioeconomic inequalities in hazardous alcohol consumption: a 22-year cross-sectional study in a Swiss urban population.酒精控制政策与危险饮酒的社会经济不平等:瑞士城市人口 22 年的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e028971. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028971.
5
Subjective social status and inequalities in depressive symptoms: a gender-specific decomposition analysis for South Africa.主观社会地位与抑郁症状的不平等:南非的性别特定分解分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 13;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0996-0.
6
Educational inequalities in hypertension: complex patterns in intersections with gender and race in Brazil.高血压方面的教育不平等:巴西在与性别和种族交叉方面的复杂模式。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 17;15(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0441-6.
7
Socioeconomic inequality in mental health disorders: A cross-sectional study from the Tehran University of Medical Sciences employees' cohort study.心理健康障碍中的社会经济不平等:来自德黑兰医科大学员工队列研究的横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;15(1):17796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02192-8.
8
Inequality and Inequity in the Use of Oral Health Services in Australian Adults.澳大利亚成年人口腔健康服务使用中的不平等与不公平现象。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2022 Oct;7(4):389-397. doi: 10.1177/23800844211027489. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
9
Intersectional inequalities in mental health by education, income, gender, and age before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a longitudinal study.荷兰在 COVID-19 大流行前后,按教育、收入、性别和年龄划分的心理健康交叉不平等:一项纵向研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Nov 25;23(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02338-6.
10
Educational and wealth inequalities in tobacco use among men and women in 54 low-income and middle-income countries.54 个低收入和中等收入国家中男女在烟草使用方面的教育和财富不平等。
Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):26-34. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053266. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 and the Nordic Paradox: a call to measure the inequality reducing benefits of welfare systems in the wake of the pandemic.COVID-19 和北欧悖论:呼吁在大流行之后衡量福利制度减少不平等的好处。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114455. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114455. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
2
Intersectional structural vulnerability to abusive policing among people who inject drugs: A mixed methods assessment in California's central valley.注射吸毒者在遭受滥用警务方面的交叉结构脆弱性:加利福尼亚中央山谷的一项混合方法评估。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jan;87:102981. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102981. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Uncovering the Genetic Architecture of Major Depression.揭示重度抑郁症的遗传结构。
Neuron. 2019 Apr 3;102(1):91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.022.
2
Neural correlates of depression in women across the reproductive lifespan - An fMRI review.女性生殖生命周期中抑郁的神经相关性——一项 fMRI 综述。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:556-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.133. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
3
Reproductive history and risk of depressive symptoms in postmenopausal women: A cross-sectional study in eastern China.绝经后妇女的生殖史与抑郁症状风险:一项中国东部的横断面研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.031. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
Uncovering the hidden impacts of inequality on mental health: a global study.揭示不平等对心理健康的隐性影响:一项全球性研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2018 May 18;8(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0148-0.
5
Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms.全国代表性样本中抑郁症的性别差异:诊断与症状的荟萃分析
Psychol Bull. 2017 Aug;143(8):783-822. doi: 10.1037/bul0000102. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
6
Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries.社会支持与抑郁预防:西方国家现有研究结果的系统综述。
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;209(4):284-293. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.169094. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
7
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.消除一代人之间的差距:通过针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动实现健康公平。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.
8
[Socioeconomic inequality and mental health: a Latin American literature review].[社会经济不平等与心理健康:拉丁美洲文献综述]
Cad Saude Publica. 2007 Jun;23(6):1255-72. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007000600002.
9
Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis.抑郁症中的社会经济不平等:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jan 15;157(2):98-112. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf182.
10
Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale).健康老年人抑郁症筛查:流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)简版评估
Am J Prev Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;10(2):77-84.